- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Opioid-related disorders"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Associations of opioid prescription dose and discontinuation with risk of substance-related morbidity in long-term opioid therapy(Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Quinn, Patrick D.; Chang, Zheng; Bair, Matthew J.; Rickert, Martin E.; Gibbons, Robert D.; Kroenke, Kurt; D’Onofrio, Brian M.; Medicine, School of MedicineEfforts to reduce opioid-related harms have decreased opioid prescription but have provoked concerns about unintended consequences, particularly for long-term opioid therapy (LtOT) recipients. Research is needed to address the knowledge gap regarding how risk of substance-related morbidity changes across LtOT and its discontinuation. This study used nationwide commercial insurance claims data and a within-individual design to examine associations of LtOT dose and discontinuation with substance-related morbidity. We identified 194,839 adolescents and adults who initiated opioid prescription in 2010 to 2018 and subsequently received LtOT. The cohort was followed for a median of 965 days (interquartile range, 525-1550), of which a median of 176 days (119-332) were covered by opioid prescription. During follow-up, there were 17,582 acute substance-related morbidity events, defined as claims for emergency visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and ambulance transportation with substance use disorder or overdose diagnoses. Relative to initial treatment, risk was greater within individual during subsequent periods of >60 to 120 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.49) and >120 (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.24-1.76) daily morphine milligram equivalents. Risk was also greater during days 1 to 30 after discontinuations than during initial treatment (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35). However, it was no greater than during the 30 days before discontinuations, indicating that the risk may not be wholly attributable to discontinuation itself. Results were supported by a negative control pharmacotherapy analysis and additional sensitivity analyses. They suggest that LtOT recipients may experience increased substance-related morbidity risk during treatment subsequent to initial opioid prescription, particularly in periods involving higher doses.Item Expert Panel Consensus on State-Level Policies to Improve Engagement and Retention in Treatment for Opioid Use Disord(American Medical Association, 2022-09-02) Smart, Rosanna; Grant, Sean; Gordon, Adam J.; Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo; Stein, Bradley D.; Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthImportance: In the US, recent legislation and regulations have been considered, proposed, and implemented to improve the quality of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, insufficient empirical evidence exists to identify which policies are feasible to implement and successfully improve patient and population-level outcomes. Objective: To examine expert consensus on the effectiveness and the ability to implement state-level OUD treatment policies. Evidence review: This qualitative study used the ExpertLens online platform to conduct a 3-round modified Delphi process to convene 66 stakeholders (health care clinicians, social service practitioners, addiction researchers, health policy decision-makers, policy advocates, and persons with lived experience). Stakeholders participated in 1 of 2 expert panels on 14 hypothetical state-level policies targeting treatment engagement and linkage, evidence-based and integrated care, treatment flexibility, and monitoring or support services. Participants rated policies in round 1, discussed results in round 2, and provided final ratings in round 3. Participants used 4 criteria associated with either the effectiveness or implementability to rate and discuss each policy. The effectiveness panel (n = 29) considered policy effects on treatment engagement, treatment retention, OUD remission, and opioid overdose mortality. The implementation panel (n = 34) considered the acceptability, feasibility, affordability, and equitability of each policy. We measured consensus using the interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry analysis technique from the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Findings: Both panels reached consensus on all items. Experts viewed 2 policies (facilitated access to medications for OUD and automatic Medicaid enrollment for citizens returning from correctional settings) as highly implementable and highly effective in improving patient and population-level outcomes. Participants rated hub-and-spoke-type policies and provision of financial incentives to emergency departments for treatment linkage as effective; however, they also rated these policies as facing implementation barriers associated with feasibility and affordability. Coercive policies and policies levying additional requirements on individuals with OUD receiving treatment (eg, drug toxicology testing, counseling requirements) were viewed as low-value policies (ie, decreasing treatment engagement and retention, increasing overdose mortality, and increasing health inequities). Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this study may provide urgently needed consensus on policies for states to consider either adopting or deimplementing in their efforts to address the opioid overdose crisis.Item Improving Uptake of Emergency Department-initiated Buprenorphine: Barriers and Solutions(Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 2022-07-11) Kelly, Timothy D.; Hawk, Kathryn F.; Samuels, Elizabeth A.; Strayer, Reuben J.; Hoppe, Jason A.; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineEmergency departments (ED) are increasingly providing buprenorphine to persons with opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine programs in the ED have strong support from public health leaders and emergency medicine specialty societies and have proven to be clinically effective, cost effective, and feasible. Even so, few ED buprenorphine programs currently exist. Given this imbalance between evidence-based practice and current practice, proven behavior change approaches can be used to guide local efforts to expand ED buprenorphine capacity. In this paper, we use the theory of planned behavior to identify and address the 1) clinician factors, 2) institutional factors, and 3) external factors surrounding ED buprenorphine implementation. By doing so, we seek to provide actionable and pragmatic recommendations to increase ED buprenorphine availability across different practice settings.Item Incident and long-term opioid therapy among patients with psychiatric conditions and medications: a national study of commercial health care claims(Wolters Kluwer, 2017-01) Quinn, Patrick D.; Hur, Kwan; Chang, Zheng; Krebs, Erin E.; Bair, Matthew J.; Scott, Eric L.; Rickert, Martin E.; Gibbons, Robert D.; Kroenke, Kurt; D’Onofrio, Brian M.; Medicine, School of MedicineThere is growing evidence that opioid prescribing in the United States follows a pattern in which patients who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes from opioids are more likely to receive long-term opioid therapy. These patients include, in particular, those with substance use disorders (SUDs) and other psychiatric conditions. This study examined health insurance claims among 10,311,961 patients who filled prescriptions for opioids. Specifically, we evaluated how opioid receipt differed among patients with and without a wide range of preexisting psychiatric and behavioral conditions (ie, opioid and nonopioid SUDs, suicide attempts or other self-injury, motor vehicle crashes, and depressive, anxiety, and sleep disorders) and psychoactive medications (ie, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and medications used for SUD, tobacco cessation, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). Relative to those without, patients with all assessed psychiatric conditions and medications had modestly greater odds of subsequently filling prescriptions for opioids and, in particular, substantially greater risk of long-term opioid receipt. Increases in risk for long-term opioid receipt in adjusted Cox regressions ranged from approximately 1.5-fold for prior attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication prescriptions (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-1.58) to approximately 3-fold for prior nonopioid SUD diagnoses (HR = 3.15; 95% CI, 3.06-3.24) and nearly 9-fold for prior opioid use disorder diagnoses (HR = 8.70; 95% CI, 8.20-9.24). In sum, we found evidence of greater opioid receipt among commercially insured patients with a breadth of psychiatric conditions. Future studies assessing behavioral outcomes associated with opioid prescribing should consider preexisting psychiatric conditions.Item Medication for Adolescents and Young Adults with Opioid Use Disorder(Elsevier, 2021) Hadland, Scott E.; Aalsma, Matthew C.; Akgül, Sinem; Alinsky, Rachel H.; Bruner, Ann; Chadi, Nicholas; Galagali, Preeti M.; Kreida, Ellen C.; Robinson, Camille A.; Wilson, J. Deanna; Pediatrics, School of MedicineOpioid-related morbidity and mortality have risen in many settings globally. It is critical that practitioners who work with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) provide timely, evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Such treatment should include medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone. Medication treatment is associated with reduced mortality, fewer relapses to opioid use, and enhanced recovery and retention in addiction care, among other positive health outcomes. Unfortunately, the vast majority of AYAs with OUD do not receive medication. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine recommends that AYAs be offered MOUD as a critical component of an integrated treatment approach. Barriers to receipt of medications are widespread; many are common to high-, middle-, and low-income countries alike, whereas others differ. Such barriers should be minimized to ensure equitable access to youth-friendly, affirming, and confidential addiction treatment that includes MOUD. Robust education on OUD and medication treatment should be provided to all practitioners who work with AYAs. Strategies to reduce stigma surrounding medication-and stigma experienced by individuals with substance use disorders more generally-should be widely implemented. A broad research agenda is proposed with the goal of expanding the evidence base for the use and delivery of MOUD for AYAs.Item Multi-trait genome-wide association study of opioid addiction: OPRM1 and beyond(Springer Nature, 2022-10-07) Gaddis, Nathan; Mathur, Ravi; Marks, Jesse; Zhou, Linran; Quach, Bryan; Waldrop, Alex; Levran, Orna; Agrawal, Arpana; Randesi, Matthew; Adelson, Miriam; Jeffries, Paul W.; Martin, Nicholas G.; Degenhardt, Louisa; Montgomery, Grant W.; Wetherill, Leah; Lai, Dongbing; Bucholz, Kathleen; Foroud, Tatiana; Porjesz, Bernice; Runarsdottir, Valgerdur; Tyrfingsson, Thorarinn; Einarsson, Gudmundur; Gudbjartsson, Daniel F.; Webb, Bradley Todd; Crist, Richard C.; Kranzler, Henry R.; Sherva, Richard; Zhou, Hang; Hulse, Gary; Wildenauer, Dieter; Kelty, Erin; Attia, John; Holliday, Elizabeth G.; McEvoy, Mark; Scott, Rodney J.; Schwab, Sibylle G.; Maher, Brion S.; Gruza, Richard; Kreek, Mary Jeanne; Nelson, Elliot C.; Thorgeirsson, Thorgeir; Stefansson, Kari; Berrettini, Wade H.; Gelernter, Joel; Edenberg, Howard J.; Bierut, Laura; Hancock, Dana B.; Johnson, Eric Otto; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineOpioid addiction (OA) is moderately heritable, yet only rs1799971, the A118G variant in OPRM1, has been identified as a genome-wide significant association with OA and independently replicated. We applied genomic structural equation modeling to conduct a GWAS of the new Genetics of Opioid Addiction Consortium (GENOA) data together with published studies (Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Million Veteran Program, and Partners Health), comprising 23,367 cases and effective sample size of 88,114 individuals of European ancestry. Genetic correlations among the various OA phenotypes were uniformly high (rg > 0.9). We observed the strongest evidence to date for OPRM1: lead SNP rs9478500 (p = 2.56 × 10-9). Gene-based analyses identified novel genome-wide significant associations with PPP6C and FURIN. Variants within these loci appear to be pleiotropic for addiction and related traits.Item Opioid dose and risk of suicide(Wolters Kluwer, 2016-05) Ilgen, Mark A.; Bohnert, Amy S.B.; Ganoczy, Dara; Bair, Matthew J.; McCarthy, John F.; Blow, Frederic C.; Medicine, School of MedicineChronic pain is associated with increased risk of suicide, and opioids are commonly used to treat moderate to severe pain. However, the association between opioid dose and suicide mortality has not been examined closely. This retrospective data analysis described the risk of suicide associated with differing prescribed opioid doses. Data were from Veterans Affairs health care system treatment records and the National Death Index. Records analyzed were those of Veterans Affairs patients with chronic pain receiving opioids in fiscal years 2004 to 2005 (N = 123,946). Primary predictors were maximum prescribed morphine-equivalent daily opioid dose and opioid fill type. The main outcome measured was suicide death, by any mechanism, and intentional overdose death during 2004 to 2009. Controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, higher prescribed opioid doses were associated with elevated suicide risk. Compared with those receiving ≤20 milligrams/day (mg/d), hazard ratios were 1.48 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.25-1.75) for 20 to <50 mg/d, 1.69 (95% CI, 1.33-2.14) for 50 to <100 mg/d, and 2.15 (95% CI, 1.64-2.81) for 100+ mg/d. The magnitude of association between opioid dose and suicide by intentional overdose was not substantially different from that observed for the overall measure of suicide mortality. Risk of suicide mortality was greater among individuals receiving higher doses of opioids, and treatment providers may want to view high opioid dose as a marker of elevated risk for suicide. Additional research is needed on opioid use, pain treatment, and suicide.Item Predicting at-risk opioid use three months after ed visit for trauma: Results from the AURORA study(Public Library of Science, 2022-09-23) Punches, Brittany E.; Stolz, Uwe; Freiermuth, Caroline E.; Ancona, Rachel M.; McLean, Samuel A.; House, Stacey L.; Beaudoin, Francesca L.; An, Xinming; Stevens, Jennifer S.; Zeng, Donglin; Neylan, Thomas C.; Clifford, Gari D.; Jovanovic, Tanja; Linnstaedt, Sarah D.; Germine, Laura T.; Bollen, Kenneth A.; Rauch, Scott L.; Haran, John P.; Storrow, Alan B.; Lewandowski, Christopher; Musey, Paul I., Jr.; Hendry, Phyllis L.; Sheikh, Sophia; Jones, Christopher W.; Kurz, Michael C.; Gentile, Nina T.; McGrath, Meghan E.; Hudak, Lauren A.; Pascual, Jose L.; Seamon, Mark J.; Harris, Erica; Chang, Anna M.; Pearson, Claire; Peak, David A.; Merchant, Roland C.; Domeier, Robert M.; Rathlev, Niels K.; O'Neil, Brian J.; Sanchez, Leon D.; Bruce, Steven E.; Pietrzak, Robert H.; Joormann, Jutta; Barch, Deanna M.; Pizzagalli, Diego A.; Smoller, Jordan W.; Luna, Beatriz; Harte, Steven E.; Elliott, James M.; Kessler, Ronald C.; Ressler, Kerry J.; Koenen, Karestan C.; Lyons, Michael S.; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: Whether short-term, low-potency opioid prescriptions for acute pain lead to future at-risk opioid use remains controversial and inadequately characterized. Our objective was to measure the association between emergency department (ED) opioid analgesic exposure after a physical, trauma-related event and subsequent opioid use. We hypothesized ED opioid analgesic exposure is associated with subsequent at-risk opioid use. Methods: Participants were enrolled in AURORA, a prospective cohort study of adult patients in 29 U.S., urban EDs receiving care for a traumatic event. Exclusion criteria were hospital admission, persons reporting any non-medical opioid use (e.g., opioids without prescription or taking more than prescribed for euphoria) in the 30 days before enrollment, and missing or incomplete data regarding opioid exposure or pain. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between ED opioid exposure and at-risk opioid use, defined as any self-reported non-medical opioid use after initial ED encounter or prescription opioid use at 3-months. Results: Of 1441 subjects completing 3-month follow-up, 872 participants were included for analysis. At-risk opioid use occurred within 3 months in 33/620 (5.3%, CI: 3.7,7.4) participants without ED opioid analgesic exposure; 4/16 (25.0%, CI: 8.3, 52.6) with ED opioid prescription only; 17/146 (11.6%, CI: 7.1, 18.3) with ED opioid administration only; 12/90 (13.3%, CI: 7.4, 22.5) with both. Controlling for clinical factors, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for at-risk opioid use after ED opioid exposure were: ED prescription only: 4.9 (95% CI 1.4, 17.4); ED administration for analgesia only: 2.0 (CI 1.0, 3.8); both: 2.8 (CI 1.2, 6.5). Conclusions: ED opioids were associated with subsequent at-risk opioid use within three months in a geographically diverse cohort of adult trauma patients. This supports need for prospective studies focused on the long-term consequences of ED opioid analgesic exposure to estimate individual risk and guide therapeutic decision-making.