Browsing by Subject "Neuropsychological assessment"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association between Cardiovascular Disease and Cognitive Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Von Ah, Diane; Crouch, Adele; Arthur, Elizabeth; Yang, Yesol; Nolan, Timiya; School of Nursing
    Background: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) may have a greater risk for cardiovascular disease [congestive heart failure (CHF) and hypertension (HTN)], which in turn, can affect cognitive dysfunction, a frequent, bothersome, and potentially debilitating symptom. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of cardiovascular disease on cognitive function in BCS. Methods: Baseline data from a double-blind RCT for cognitive training of BCS were examined. Early stage BCS (Stage I-IIIA) who were ≥21 years of age, completed adjuvant therapy (≥ 6 months), and reported cognitive concerns completed questionnaires and a brief neuropsychological assessment, including tests of memory, attention and working memory, speed of processing, and verbal fluency. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and separate linear regression models for each cognitive domain were conducted. Results: 47 BCS, who were on average 57.3 (SD=8.1) years old, 58% White and had some college education (75%), completed the study. 44.7% of the BCS had cardiovascular disease (CHF or HTN). In linear regression models, cardiovascular disease was significantly related to immediate and delayed memory and attention and working memory (p<0.01–0.05). Conclusions: BCS who have cardiovascular disease may also be at a greater risk for cognitive dysfunction post-treatment. Results from this study inform both clinical practice and future research, specifically by examining the intersect between cancer, cardiovascular disease (cardiotoxicity), and cognition. Implications for Practice: Nurses should be aware that BCS with co-occurring cardiovascular disease are at higher risk for cognitive dysfunction, and work within the multidisciplinary team to optimize BCS health and function.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Re-evaluation of Psychometric Evidence and Update of Normative Data for the Test of Practical Judgment
    (Taylor & Francis, 2022) Guayara-Quinn, Crystal G.; Nester, Caroline O.; Katz, Mindy J.; Turbeville, David M.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Lipton, Richard B.; Rabin, Laura A.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Objective: The Test of Practical Judgment (TOP-J) has shown utility in inpatient and outpatient settings in older adults who present with mild cognitive impairment and various dementia subtypes. The TOP-J has two versions (i.e., 9 items and 15 items), and was initially validated within a small rural non-Hispanic White sample. In the current study, we re-evaluated the psychometric evidence and refined scoring criteria and administration guidelines in older adults with more diverse demographic characteristics than the original validation sample. Method: Participants (N = 348) were recruited from several boroughs of New York City and surrounding areas (mean/median age = 79; mean years education = 15, median = 15.5; 68% female; 30% Black/African-American, 8% Hispanic). Results: Reliability and validity were comparable to original findings. Based on confirmatory factor analysis, one item was replaced on the 9-item version, now called TOP-J Form A. Normative data for cognitively intact participants (n = 261) were updated and stratified by two education groups. Conclusions: The TOP-J is increasingly used in clinical and research settings in the U.S. and abroad, and the current study provides improved normative data and administration and scoring guidelines for use with demographically diverse older individuals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reliable change in neuropsychological assessment of breast cancer survivors
    (Wiley, 2016-01) Andreotti, Charissa; Root, James C.; Schagen, Sanne B.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Atkinson, Thomas M.; Li, Yuelin; Ahles, Tim A.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to enhance the current understanding and interpretation of longitudinal change on tests of neurocognitive function in individuals with cancer. Scores on standard neuropsychological instruments may be impacted by practice effects and other random forms of error. METHODS: The current study assessed the test-retest reliability of several tests and overarching cognitive domains comprising a neurocognitive battery typical of those used for research and clinical evaluation using relevant time frames. Practice effect-adjusted reliable change confidence intervals for test-retest difference scores based on a sample of patient-matched healthy controls are provided. RESULTS: By applying reliable change confidence intervals to scores from two samples of breast cancer patients at post-treatment follow-up assessment, meaningful levels of detectable change in cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors were ascertained and indicate that standardized neuropsychological instruments may be subject to limitations in detection of subtle cognitive dysfunction over clinically relevant intervals, especially in patient samples with average to above average range baseline functioning. CONCLUSIONS: These results are discussed in relation to reported prevalence of cognitive change in breast cancer patients along with recommendations for study designs that enhance detection of treatment effects.