Browsing by Subject "Neuromuscular monitoring"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Association Between Intraoperative Objective Neuromuscular Monitoring and Rocuronium Consumption During Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    (Cureus, 2021-11-04) Takahoko, Kenichi; Iwasaki, Hajime; Inaba, Yosuke; Matsuno, Takashi; Matsuno, Risako; Luthe, Sarah K.; Kanda, Hirotsugu; Kawasaki, Yohei; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Background: Rocuronium consumption with or without intraoperative objective neuromuscular monitoring in clinical settings of unrestricted use of sugammadex and neuromuscular monitoring has not been reported earlier. The study aimed to investigate the association between the use of intraoperative objective neuromuscular monitoring and rocuronium consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Methods: Data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records of patients who received laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anesthesia with rocuronium and reversal with sugammadex at a university teaching hospital between May 2017 and April 2018. A multivariate linear regression model was developed to compare the amount of rocuronium consumption (mg) per weight (kg) per hour (mg/kg/h) between the group in which intraoperative objective neuromuscular monitoring was used (NMM+ group) and the group in which intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring was not used (NMM− group). Additionally, we performed an interaction test. Results: A total of 429 patients were evaluated, with 371 patients (86%) included in the NMM+ group and 58 patients (14%) in the NMM− group. Log-transformed rocuronium consumption between the NMM+ group and NMM− group was not significantly different (back-transformed β coefficients [95% CI]: 1.080 [0.951-1.226]; P = 0.23). Male sex and body mass index (BMI) were independent factors associated with 15% (0.853 [0.788-0.924]; P < 0.001) and 3% (for every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI) (0.971 [0.963-0.979]; P < 0.001) decrease in intraoperative rocuronium consumption, respectively. A significant interaction was detected only between the use of neuromuscular monitoring and age ≥65 years (β: 0.803 [0.662-0.974]; P = 0.026). Conclusions: Although the use of intraoperative objective neuromuscular monitoring was not an individual factor influencing intraoperative rocuronium consumption, this retrospective study demonstrated that the use of intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring reduced rocuronium consumption for approximately 20% of elderly patients (age ≥65 years) undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A comparison between the adductor pollicis muscle and the abductor digiti minimi muscle using electromyography AF-201P in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study
    (BMC, 2022-04-23) Iwasaki, Hajime; Sato, Hanae; Takagi, Shunichi; Kitajima, Osamu; Luthe, Sarah Kyuragi; Suzuki, Takahiro; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Background: The AF-201P, a new electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor has been developed recently. The aim of this clinical study was to compare two ulnar nerve innervated muscles: the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block by using EMG AF-201P. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. During total intravenous general anesthesia, train-of-four (TOF) and post-tetanic counts (PTC) responses following 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium administration were concurrently monitored at the AP and the ADM muscles with EMG AF-201P on the opposite arms. At the end of the surgery, sugammadex 2 mg/kg was administered when TOF counts of 2 (TOFC2) was observed at both muscles. The primary outcome of the study was time from administration of rocuronium to first appearance of PTC response (first PTC). The secondary outcomes of the study were time from administration of rocuronium to TOF count of 1 (TOFC1), time from first PTC to TOFC1 (PTC-TOF time), time to TOFC2, and time from administration of sugammadex to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9. Agreement between the two muscles was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Time to first PTC was significantly faster at the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (24.4 ± 11.4 min vs 32.4 ± 13.1 min, p = 0.006). PTC-TOF time was significantly longer with the ADM muscle than the AP muscle (19.4 ± 7.3 min vs 12.4 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in time to TOFC2 and sugammadex-facilitated recovery between the two muscles. Bland-Altman analyses showed acceptable ranges of bias and limits of agreement of the two muscles. Conclusions: The ADM muscle showed a good agreement with the AP muscle during rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block but faster recovery of PTC response when using EMG.