Browsing by Subject "Nerve"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Emergency Department Utilization After Administration of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Upper Extremity Surgery
    (Sage, 2022) Loewenstein, Scott N.; Bamba, Ravinder; Adkinson, Joshua M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks on emergency department (ED) utilization after hand and upper extremity surgery. Methods: We reviewed all outpatient upper extremity surgeries performed in a single Midwestern state between January 2009 and June 2019 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care. These encounters were used to develop a database of patient demographics, comorbidities, concurrent procedures, and postoperative ED visit utilization data. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Among 108 451 outpatient surgical patients, 9079 (8.4%) received blocks. Within 1 week of surgery, a greater proportion of patients who received peripheral nerve blocks (1.4%) presented to the ED than patients who did not (0.9%) (P < .001). The greatest risk was in the first 2 postoperative days (relative risk, 1.78; P < .001). Pain was the principal reason for ED utilization in the block cohort (53.6%) compared with those who did not undergo a block (35.1%) (P < .001). When controlling for comorbidities and demographics, only peripheral nerve blocks (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.71; P = 0.007) and preprocedural opioid use (adjusted OR, 1.43; P = .020) conferred an independently increased risk of ED utilization within the first 2 postoperative days. Conclusions: Peripheral nerve blocks used for upper extremity surgery are associated with a higher risk of unplanned ED utilization, most likely related to rebound pain. Through proper patient education and pain management, we can minimize this unnecessary resource utilization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Risk Factors for a False-Negative Examination in Complete Upper Extremity Nerve Lacerations
    (Sage, 2021) Loewenstein, Scott N.; Wulbrecht, Reed; Leonhard, Vanessa; Sasor, Sarah; Cook, Julia; Timsina, Lava; Adkinson, Joshua; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Many patients with complete nerve lacerations after upper extremity trauma have a documented normal peripheral nerve examination at the time of initial evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether physician-, patient-, and injury-related factors increase the risk of false-negative nerve examinations. Methods: A statewide health information exchange was used to identify complete upper extremity nerve lacerations subsequently confirmed by surgical exploration at 1 pediatric and 2 adult level I trauma centers in a single city from January 2013 to January 2017. Charts were manually reviewed to build a database that included Glasgow Coma Scale score, urine drug screen results, blood alcohol level, presence of concomitant trauma, type of injury, level of injury, laterality, initial provider examination, and initial specialist examination. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for a false-negative examination. Results: Two hundred eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall false-negative examination rate was 32.5% at initial encounter, which was higher among emergency medicine physicians compared with extremity subspecialists (P < .001) and among trauma surgeons compared with surgical subspecialists (P = .002). The false-negative rate decreased to 8% at subsequent encounter (P < .001). Risk factors for a false-negative nerve examination included physician specialty, a gunshot wound mechanism of injury, injury at the elbow, and age greater than 71 years. Conclusion: There is a high false-negative rate among upper extremity neurotmesis injuries. Patients with an injury pattern that may lead to nerve injury warrant prompt referral to an upper extremity specialist in an effort to optimize outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Association of Insurance Status and Complications After Carpal Tunnel Release
    (Sage, 2023) Sun Cao, Phoebus; Loewenstein, Scott N.; Timsina, Lava R.; Adkinson, Joshua M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in hand surgery. Complications from surgery are a rare but significant patient dissatisfier. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insurance status is independently associated with complications after CTR. Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing CTR between 2008 and 2018 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care, a state-wide health information exchange, and built a database that included patient demographics and comorbidities. Patients were followed for 90 days to determine whether a postoperative complication occurred. To minimize dropout, only patients with 1 year of encounters after surgery were included. Results: Of the 26 151 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2662 (10.2%) had Medicare, 7027 (26.9%) had Medicaid, and 16 462 (62.9%) had commercial insurance. Compared with Medicare, Medicaid status (P < .001) and commercial insurance status (P < .001) were independently associated with postoperative CTR complications. The overall complication rate was 2.23%, with infection, wound breakdown, and complex regional pain syndrome being the most common complications. Younger age, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression were also independently associated with complications. Conclusions: The incidence of complications after CTR is low. Insurance status, patient demographics, and medical comorbidities, however, should be evaluated preoperatively to appropriately risk stratify patients. Furthermore, surgeons can use these data to initiate preventive measures such as working to manage current comorbidities and lifestyle choices, and to optimize insurance coverage.