Browsing by Subject "Neoplasm Recurrence"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Randomized Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming with Guadecitabine and Carboplatin in Platinum-resistant, Recurrent Ovarian CancerA Randomized Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming with Guadecitabine and Carboplatin in Platinum-resistant, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    (American Association for Cancer Research, 2020-03-01) Oza, Amit M.; Matulonis, Ursula A.; Secord, Angeles Alvarez; Nemunaitis, John; Roman, Lynda D.; Blagden, Sarah P.; Banerjee, Susana; McGuire, William P.; Ghamande, Sharad; Birrer, Michael J.; Fleming, Gini F.; Markham, Merry Jennifer; Hirte, Hal W.; Provencher, Diane M.; Basu, Bristi; Kristeleit, Rebecca; Armstrong, Deborah K.; Schwartz, Benjamin; Braly, Patricia; Hall, Geoff D.; Nephew, Kenneth P.; Jueliger, Simone; Oganesian, Aram; Naim, Sue; Hao, Yong; Keer, Harold; Azab, Mohammad; Matei, Daniela; Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with epigenetic modifications. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have been studied as carboplatin re-sensitizing agents in OC. This randomized phase 2 trial compared guadecitabine, a second generation HMA, and carboplatin (G+C) against second-line chemotherapy in women with measurable or detectable platinum-resistant OC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received either G+C (guadecitabine 30 mg/m2 SC once-daily for 5 days and carboplatin) or treatment of choice (TC; topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were RECIST v1.1 and CA-125 response rate, 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 100 patients treated, 51 received G+C and 49 received TC, of which 27 crossed over to G+C. The study did not meet its primary endpoint as the median PFS was not statistically different between arms (16.3 weeks vs 9.1 weeks in the G+C and TC groups, respectively; P = 0.07). However, the 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the G+C group (37% vs. 11% in TC group; P = 0.003). The incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was similar in G+C and TC groups (51% and 49%, respectively), with neutropenia and leukopenia being more frequent in the G+C group. CONCLUSIONS: Although this trial did not show superiority for PFS of G+C versus TC, the 6-month PFS increased in G+C treated patients. Further refinement of this strategy should focus on identification of predictive markers for patient selection.