Browsing by Subject "Myelofibrosis"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Does Race Play a Role in Complications and Outcomes of Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms?
    (2021) Peseski, Andrew M.; Saliba, Antoine N.; Althouse, Sandra K.; Sayar, Hamid; Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of hematologic malignancies with known vascular complications. The role race and ethnicity play in these complications is less defined. We aimed to further evaluate the role of race in patients without a history of previous thrombotic or hemorrhagic events. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 300 adult patients with MPN were included; 270 (90.0%) were White and 30 (10.0%) were non-White. The non-White group primarily consisted of African American or Black (26 patients), followed by others. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years for White patients and 61.5 years for non-White patients. The interaction between outcomes and vascular events with race was evaluated using multivariate logistical regression models. RESULTS: The incidence of thrombotic events was inversely correlated with age at diagnosis, with younger patients demonstrating a higher rate of thrombotic events over time (p < .001). The incidence of thrombotic or hemorrhagic events did not differ between White and non-White patients. A statistically significant difference in median survival was observed between White and non-White patients: 29 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.8-not reached) versus 13 years (95% CI: 5.7-22.7), respectively (p = .016). CONCLUSION: This study did not find a significant difference in the rate of thrombotic or hemorrhagic events between White and non-White patients with MPN but suggested that non-White patients had significantly shorter median survival than White patients. Such observations may inform future studies to further characterize racial disparities in outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Survival following allogeneic transplant in patients with myelofibrosis
    (American Society of Hematology, 2020-05-08) Gowin, Krisstina; Ballen, Karen; Ahn, Kwang Woo; Hu, Zhen-Huan; Ali, Haris; Arcasoy, Murat O.; Devlin, Rebecca; Coakley, Maria; Gerds, Aaron T.; Green, Michael; Gupta, Vikas; Hobbs, Gabriela; Jain, Tania; Kandarpa, Malathi; Komrokji, Rami; Kuykendall, Andrew T.; Luber, Kierstin; Masarova, Lucia; Michaelis, Laura C.; Patches, Sarah; Pariser, Ashley C.; Rampal, Raajit; Stein, Brady; Talpaz, Moshe; Verstovsek, Srdan; Wadleigh, Martha; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Avalos, Belinda R.; Bacher, Ulrike; Bashey, Asad; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Cerny, Jan; Chhabra, Saurabh; Copelan, Edward; Cutler, Corey S.; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Ganguly, Siddhartha; Grunwald, Michael R.; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Kindwall-Keller, Tamila; Kröger, Nicolaus; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Liesveld, Jane L.; Litzow, Mark R.; Marks, David I.; Nathan, Sunita; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Pawarod, Attaphol; Rowe, Jacob M.; Savani, Bipin N.; Savoie, Mary Lynn; Seo, Sachiko; Solh, Melhem; Tamari, Roni; Verdonck, Leo F.; Yared, Jean A.; Alyea, Edwin; Popat, Uday; Sobecks, Ronald; Scott, Bart L.; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Mesa, Ruben; Saber, Wael; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.