Browsing by Subject "Muscle stem cells"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Muscle stem cells contribute to long-term tissue repletion following surgical sepsis
    (Wiley, 2023) Schmitt, Rebecca E.; Dasgupta, Aneesha; Arneson-Wissink, Paige C.; Datta, Srijani; Ducharme, Alexandra M.; Doles, Jason D.; Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine
    Background: Over the past decade, advances in sepsis identification and management have resulted in decreased sepsis mortality. This increase in survivorship has highlighted a new clinical obstacle: chronic critical illness (CCI), for which there are no effective treatment options. Up to half of sepsis survivors suffer from CCI, which can include multi-organ dysfunction, chronic inflammation, muscle wasting, physical and mental disabilities, and enhanced frailty. These symptoms prevent survivors from returning to regular day-to-day activities and are directly associated with poor quality of life. Methods: Mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) with daily chronic stress (DCS) as an in vivo model to study sepsis late-effects/sequelae on skeletal muscle components. Longitudinal monitoring was performed via magnetic resonance imaging, skeletal muscle and/or muscle stem cell (MuSCs) assays (e.g., post-necropsy wet muscle weights, minimum Feret diameter measurements, in vitro MuSC proliferation and differentiation, number of regenerating myofibres and numbers of Pax7-positive nuclei per myofibre), post-sepsis whole muscle metabolomics and MuSC isolation and high-content transcriptional profiling. Results: We report several findings supporting the hypothesis that MuSCs/muscle regeneration are critically involved in post-sepsis muscle recovery. First, we show that genetic ablation of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) impairs post-sepsis muscle recovery (maintenance of 5-8% average lean mass loss compared with controls). Second, we observe impaired MuSCs expansion capacity and morphological defects at 26 days post-sepsis compared with control MuSCs (P < 0.001). Third, when subjected to an experimental muscle injury, sepsis-recovered mice exhibited evidence of impaired muscle regeneration compared with non-septic mice receiving the same muscle injury (CLP/DCS injured mean minimum Feret is 92.1% of control injured, P < 0.01). Fourth, we performed a longitudinal RNA sequencing study on MuSCs isolated from post-sepsis mice and found clear transcriptional differences in all post-sepsis samples compared with controls. At Day 28, CLP/DCS mice satellite cells have multiple altered metabolic pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial dysfunction, sirtuin signalling and oestrogen receptor signalling, compared with controls (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data show that MuSCs and muscle regeneration are required for effective post-sepsis muscle recovery and that sepsis triggers morphological, functional, and transcriptional changes in MuSCs. Moving forward, we strive to leverage a more complete understanding of post-sepsis MuSC/regenerative defects to identify and test novel therapies that promote muscle recovery and improve quality of life in sepsis survivors.