Browsing by Subject "Mixed Methods"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Enduring Uncertainty Through the Lens of Osteoporosis: A Mixed Methods Study
    (2024-06) Vlaeminck, Caitlin Mae; Miller, Wendy Trueblood; Carter, Gregory; Crowder, Sharron J.; Otte, Julie; Longtin, Krista
    Osteoporosis is a chronic illness that is underdiagnosed and often poorly managed. Uncertainty is a phenomenon experienced by individuals diagnosed with chronic illness. There are no published American studies describing whether women diagnosed with osteoporosis experience uncertainty. Experiencing uncertainty can lead to decreased quality of life (QOL), delays in decision-making, and negative impacts on relationships. A mixed methods approach was used using descriptive statistics and two scales, The Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Community Form (MUIS-C) and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health scale, and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Significant negative correlations were found between levels of uncertainty and physical health status and between physical and mental health. The qualitative study focused on describing the experience individuals had with the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with fourteen Caucasian women who all had a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Thematic analysis revealed five themes that could be chronologically processed: The Sentinel Event, Adapting to Chronic Disease, Navigating Uncertainty, Being Less Than, and What the Future Holds. The findings of this study have implications for how healthcare providers share knowledge and education about the disease of osteoporosis with individuals. Future research should include women and men from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. This inclusive approach is crucial for ensuring that preventive measures and management strategies are tailored to the diverse needs of all individuals, fostering equity and efficacy in osteoporosis care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of the Indianapolis Mobile Crisis Assistance Team
    (2018) Bailey, Katie; Ray, Brad; Grommon, Eric; Lowder, Evan; Rising Paquet, Staci
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How Do Medical Students Approach Critical Appraisal? Results from a Mixed-Methods Study
    (2023-05-19) Menard, Laura M.; Blevins, Amy E.; Vetter, Cecelia J.; Trujillo, Daniel J.
    OBJECTIVES: Our research team wanted to find out what principles and best practices medical students use when prompted by a clerkship assignment to complete a critical appraisal of an article of their choosing. Our hypothesis was that, outside of a structured classroom environment, many students would default to more basic literature evaluation strategies or even apply proxies for methodological rigor such as journal reputation or peer review status of a study. METHODS: All first-year clerkship students at the School of Medicine are required to complete a patient-focused evidence-based medicine (EBM) assignment during their Internal Medicine clerkship. A team of three librarians and one statistician undertook a mixed-methods approach to identify and quantify themes that emerged in the text of one year's worth of these assignments (n=343). A mixed method research approach was implemented to gain a greater understanding of the EBM principles and best practices that students reference in their assignments. Within this approach a qualitative content analysis was conducted, followed by a quantitative analysis of patterns within the sample. The research team used first- and second cycle coding and a collaboratively developed code list of nine major codes to ensure accuracy and standardization. Additionally, the research team's statistician implemented an inter-rater reliability plan and examined inter-class correlations to ensure grading consistency across team members and student assignments. Once all assignments had been coded, the team used statistical analysis to find correlations between codes as well as frequency of code application within the sample in order to identify five major critical appraisal themes which emerged in the students' assignments. RESULTS: After a rigorous coding process, several codes and related themes emerged. The research team identified nine main codes and five major themes. These themes are as follows: Theme 1: Comparing the study population to the patient being treated and recommending a course of action Theme 2: Identifying study type and position in hierarchy of evidence Theme 3: Identifying proxies for study quality, including provenance and timeliness of chosen study Theme 4: Summarizing study methodology and results Theme 5: Attempting a critical appraisal of chosen study Additionally, we identified correlations between themes as well as frequency of application in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: A few notable results from our analysis of this sample are the frequency with which students were able to summarize the results of their chosen study and apply what they had learned to patient care (54.5% and 46.9% of all assignments, respectively). However, a notable number of students (35.2%) incorrectly used journal reputation, peer review status, h-index, impact factor, or similar metric, as a proxy for critical appraisal without engaging with the study methodology. This indicates that there is a need for further education and engagement with clerkship directors regarding the utility and application of EBM skills in the clinical curriculum.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Perceptions of IUPUI Faculty and Staff Regarding the Center for Service and Learning Faculty/Staff Development Programs
    (IUPUI ScholarWorks, 2019-08-06) Makki Alamdari, Sara; Hahn, Thomas; Price, Mary F.; Studer, Morgan
    The purpose of this evaluation was to understand perceptions of IUPUI faculty and staff regarding the influence of the Center for Service and Learning’s (CSL) programs and resources on respondents. Specifically, the evaluation was intended to deepen CSL’s understanding of respondents’ experiences as community-engaged professionals at IUPUI. Additionally, the evaluation sought to gather input on new ideas to strengthen CSL services and programming going forward. IUPUI faculty and staff who have participated in CSL workshops, trainings, and/or requested information from CSL were emailed during the fall of 2018 and asked to participate in the Qualtrics survey. The survey was anonymous. This report shares overall findings from the survey and provides general recommendations.