Browsing by Subject "Medical residencies"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    2363. Clinician Educators within Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): Who We Are, What We Do, and What We Need to Succeed
    (Oxford University Press, 2022) Zimmer, Andrea J.; Barsoumian, Alice E.; Hsu, Jennifer; Walker, Jeremey; Summers, Nathan A.; Derber, Catherine; Allen, Bradley L.; Ressner, Roseanne; Kershaw, Colleen; Luther, Vera; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: To best support, its membership, the IDSA Medical Education Community of Practice (Med Ed CoP) must know the spectrum of educational duties, common challenges, and needs among its clinician educators (CE). Further, benchmark data for medical education is lacking, including average time to perform duties, salary support, and other resources. Therefore, we conducted a survey to help identify opportunities for institutions and IDSA to support Infectious Disease (ID) CE. Methods: We conducted an anonymous electronic mixed-methods survey of ID CE faculty in the United States. The survey link was distributed through the IDSA Med Ed CoP and Program Director discussion forums and receptions at IDWeek 2021. Results: Approximately 90/552 (16%) participants completed a majority of the survey. Respondents were evenly distributed by gender and geographic region. A majority of respondents were Caucasian, aged 30 – 49 years, and at the Assistant or Associate Professor level (Table 1). Overall breakdown of allocated duties is as follows; median education full-time equivalent (FTE) was 0.25, clinical FTE=0.50, administrative FTE=0.16, and research FTE=0 (Table 1). Faculty most commonly taught medical students (95%), physician residents (92%), and fellows (88%) and held positions within ID fellowship programs (69%) and medical schools (50%, Table 2). CE's common challenges included competing responsibilities (69%), lack of medical education mentorship (51%), and inexperience in medical education publication (67%). In addition, 77% reported burnout in the past year, frequently due to an increased pandemic-related workload. CEs would like to see opportunities for IDSA grants, advocacy for salary support, and increased opportunities to publish within IDSA journals. CEs report finding reward in their educational work related to: teaching the next generation, developing relationships with learners and colleagues, and promoting others’ success. Conclusion: In our study, ID CEs identified common challenges including educational work often requiring more time than allocated FTE, lack of mentors, publishing educational activities, recognition of CE work for promotion, and burnout. Additionally, ID CEs identified practical strategies in which their institutions and IDSA can offer support.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development and Implementation of a Quick Response (QR) Code System to Streamline the Process for Fellows’ Evaluation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at a Large Academic Center
    (Springer Nature, 2023-10-22) Kane, Sara K.; Wetzel, Elizabeth A.; Niehaus, Jason Z.; Abu-Sultaneh, Samer; Beardsly, Andrew; Bales, Melissa; Parsons, Deb; Rowan, Courtney M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background/objective: Useful feedback and evaluation are critical to a medical trainee's development. While most academic physicians understand that giving feedback to learners is essential, many do not consider the components of feedback to be truly useful, and there are barriers to implementation. We sought to use a quick reader (QR) system to solicit feedback for trainees in two pediatric subspecialties (pediatric critical care and neonatal-perinatal medicine) at one institution to increase the quality and quantity of feedback received. Methods: New valuations were modified from the existing evaluations and imported into online systems with QR code capability. Each fellow was given a QR code linking to evaluations and encouraged to solicit feedback and evaluations in a variety of clinical settings and scenarios. Evaluation numbers and quality of evaluations were assessed and compared both pre- and post-intervention. Results: There were increases in the number of evaluations completed for both the pediatric critical care fellows and the neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows. There was no overall change in the quality of written evaluations received. Satisfaction with the evaluation system improved for both faculty and fellows of both training programs. Conclusion: In our critical care units, we were successfully able to implement a QR code-driven evaluation for our fellows that improved access for the faculty and offered the ability of the learner to solicit evaluations, without compromising the number or quality of evaluations. What's new: Quick reader (QR) codes can be used by learners to solicit evaluations and feedback from faculty. They can increase the quantity of written evaluations received without affecting their quality.