- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Medical records"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Acceptance of use of personal health record: factors affecting physicians' perspective(2011-10-19) Agrawal, Ekta; Jones, Josette F.; Weiner, Michael; Simmermaker, JenniferAcceptance of PHR by physicians is fundamental as they play important role towards the promotion of PHR adoption by providing the access to the data to be maintained in PHR and also, using the information within the PHR for decision making. Therefore it is important to measure physicians' perspective on usefulness of PHR, and also the value and trust they have in PHR usage. Review of previous researches identifies the lack of availability of a valid survey instrument that can be used to measure physicians' perception on all different aspects of PHR use and acceptance. Using the integrated literature review methodology and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a guiding framework, this study was aimed to identify the factors that can be used in the development of comprehensive evaluation instrument to understand physicians' acceptance of PHR. Total 15 articles were selected for literature review and using the content analysis method, 189 undifferentiated data units were extracted from those articles. These data units were then categorized into the four core constructs of UTAUT. ―Other categorization system was also created for the data units that could not be classified into one of the UTAUT core constructs. Among four core UTAUT constructs, Performance Expectancy is found to be the most influential factor in physicians' acceptance of PHR, followed by ―Other factors, Facilitating Condition and Social Influence. Effort expectancy was found to be the least influential. The identified specific factors within each domain can be used to develop a valid survey instrument to measure physicians' perception on PHR.Item Biobanks and Electronic Health Records: Ethical and Policy Challenges in the Genomic Age(IU Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research, 2009-10) Meslin, Eric M.; Goodman, KennethIn this paper we discuss the ethical and policy challenges presented by the construction and use of biobanks and electronic health records systems, with a particular focus on how these resources implicate certain types of security concerns for patients, families, health care providers and institutions. These two technology platforms are selected for special emphasis in this paper for two reasons. First and foremost, there is a close connection between them. Indeed, of the many accepted definitions, this one from the German National Bioethics Commission provides a sense of this close connection and the great power and reflects the great power these two separate platforms provide to probe more deeply the connection between genotype and phenotype: "...[B]iobanks are defined as collections of samples of human bodily substances (e.g., cells, tissues, blood or DNA as the physical medium of genetic information) that are or can be associated with personal data and information on their donors." Second, these two topics implicate both clinical ethics issues (those arising at the bedside for health care providers and patients), and human research ethics issues (issues arising for scientists, research subjects, ethics review bodies and regulatory authorities). Both of these sub-specialty areas confront similar and complementary ethical issues; for example, issues arising from the nature and adequacy of informed consent, the sufficiency of systems to protect personal privacy and confidentiality, or the need to balance concerns relating to data security and the need to know. A growing research base supports calls for more attention to these issues, and yet current professional ethics frameworks and policy consultation methods are poorly organized and ill-equipped to anticipate and fully address ethical issues in health information technology generally, or to provide adequate ethical assessment of the tools that elicit these issues. Our strategy is to orient readers to the history and context of these issues, to frame several key challenges for researchers and policy makers, and then to close with several recommendations for next steps.Item Characterization of Spontaneous and Induced Puberty in Girls with Turner Syndrome(American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2017-07) Folsom, Lisal J.; Slaven, James E.; Nabhan, Zeina M.; Eugster, Erica A.; Medicine, School of MedicineOBJECTIVE: To characterize puberty in girls with Turner syndrome (TS) and determine whether specific patient characteristics are associated with the timing of menarche. We also sought to compare spontaneous versus induced puberty in these patients. METHODS: Medical records of girls followed in our Pediatric Endocrine clinic for TS from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-three girls were included, of whom 10 (19%) achieved menarche spontaneously and 43 (81%) received hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Of girls receiving HRT, a younger age at estrogen initiation correlated with a longer time to menarche (P = .02), and a mosaic karyotype was associated with a shorter time to menarche (P = .02), whereas no relationship was seen for body mass index, estrogen regimen, or maternal age at menarche. Nineteen girls (44%) receiving HRT had bleeding on estrogen alone at a wide dose range and were more likely to be on transdermal than oral preparations (P = .01). Girls with spontaneous puberty achieved menarche at a younger age (P<.01) and were more likely to have mosaic TS (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Significant variability in the timing of menarche exists among girls with TS. However, age at pubertal induction and karyotype were significantly correlated with age at menarche in our patients. A wide range of estrogen doses is seen in girls who bleed prior to progesterone, suggesting extreme variability in estrogen sensitivity among patients with TS. Girls achieving spontaneous menarche are younger and more likely to have a mosaic karyotype than those with induced menarche. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.Item Identifying and Validating Pediatric Hospitalizations for MIS-C Through Administrative Data(American Academy of Pediatrics, 2023) Auger, Katherine A.; Hall, Matt; Arnold, Staci D.; Bhumbra, Samina; Bryan, Mersine A.; Hartley, David; Ivancie, Rebecca; Katragadda, Harita; Kazmier, Katie; Jacob, Seethal A.; Jerardi, Karen E.; Molloy, Matthew J.; Parikh, Kavita; Schondelmeyer, Amanda C.; Shah, Samir S.; Brady, Patrick W.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Individual children's hospitals care for a small number of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Administrative databases offer an opportunity to conduct generalizable research; however, identifying patients with MIS-C is challenging. Methods: We developed and validated algorithms to identify MIS-C hospitalizations in administrative databases. We developed 10 approaches using diagnostic codes and medication billing data and applied them to the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2020 to August 2021. We reviewed medical records at 7 geographically diverse hospitals to compare potential cases of MIS-C identified by algorithms to each participating hospital's list of patients with MIS-C (used for public health reporting). Results: The sites had 245 hospitalizations for MIS-C in 2020 and 358 additional MIS-C hospitalizations through August 2021. One algorithm for the identification of cases in 2020 had a sensitivity of 82%, a low false positive rate of 22%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78%. For hospitalizations in 2021, the sensitivity of the MIS-C diagnosis code was 98% with 84% PPV. Conclusion: We developed high-sensitivity algorithms to use for epidemiologic research and high-PPV algorithms for comparative effectiveness research. Accurate algorithms to identify MIS-C hospitalizations can facilitate important research for understanding this novel entity as it evolves during new waves.Item Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval(Oxford University Press, 2016-03) Demner-Fushman, Dina; Kohli, Marc D.; Rosenman, Marc B.; Shooshan, Sonya E.; Rodriguez, Laritza; Antani, Sameer; Thoma, George R.; McDonald, Clement J.; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, IU School of MedicineOBJECTIVE: Clinical documents made available for secondary use play an increasingly important role in discovery of clinical knowledge, development of research methods, and education. An important step in facilitating secondary use of clinical document collections is easy access to descriptions and samples that represent the content of the collections. This paper presents an approach to developing a collection of radiology examinations, including both the images and radiologist narrative reports, and making them publicly available in a searchable database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors collected 3996 radiology reports from the Indiana Network for Patient Care and 8121 associated images from the hospitals' picture archiving systems. The images and reports were de-identified automatically and then the automatic de-identification was manually verified. The authors coded the key findings of the reports and empirically assessed the benefits of manual coding on retrieval. RESULTS: The automatic de-identification of the narrative was aggressive and achieved 100% precision at the cost of rendering a few findings uninterpretable. Automatic de-identification of images was not quite as perfect. Images for two of 3996 patients (0.05%) showed protected health information. Manual encoding of findings improved retrieval precision. CONCLUSION: Stringent de-identification methods can remove all identifiers from text radiology reports. DICOM de-identification of images does not remove all identifying information and needs special attention to images scanned from film. Adding manual coding to the radiologist narrative reports significantly improved relevancy of the retrieved clinical documents. The de-identified Indiana chest X-ray collection is available for searching and downloading from the National Library of Medicine (http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/).