ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Lymphadenectomy"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Is Bilateral Lymphadenectomy For Midline Squamous Carcinoma Of The Vulva Always Necessary? An Analysis From Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 173
    (Elsevier, 2013) Coleman, Robert L.; Ali, Shamshad; Levenback, Charles F.; Gold, Michael A.; Fowler, Jeffrey M.; Judson, Patricia L.; Bell, Maria C.; De Geest, Koen; Spirtos, Nick M.; Potkul, Ronald K.; Leitao, Mario M., Jr.; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.; Rossi, Emma C.; Lentz, Samuel S.; Burke, James J., II; Van Le, Linda; Trimble, Cornelia L.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective: To determine which patients with near midline lesions may safely undergo unilateral groin dissection based on clinical exam and lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) results. Methods: Patients participating in GOG-173 underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization with blue dye, and radiocolloid with optional LSG before definitive inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy (LND). This analysis interrogates the reliability of LSG alone relative to primary tumor location in those patients who had an interpretable LSG and at least one SLN identified. Primary tumor location was categorized as lateral (>2cm from midline), midline, or lateral ambiguous (LA) if located within 2cm, but not involving the midline. Results: Two-hundred-thirty-four patients met eligibility criteria. Sixty-four had lateral lesions, and underwent unilateral LND. All patients with LA (N=65) and midline (N=105) tumors underwent bilateral LND. Bilateral drainage by LSG was identified in 14/64 (22%) patients with lateral tumors, 38/65 (58%) with LA tumors and in 73/105 (70%) with midline tumors. At mapping, no SLNs were found in contralateral groins among those patients with LA and midline tumors who had unilateral-only LSGs. However, in these patients groin metastases were found in 4/32 patients with midline tumors undergoing contralateral dissection; none were found in 27 patients with LA tumors. Conclusion: The likelihood of detectable bilateral drainage using preoperative LSG decreases as a function of distance from midline. Patients with LA primaries and unilateral drainage on LSG may safely undergo unilateral SLN.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Utilization Patterns of Lymph Node Dissection in Endometrial Cancer Patients Without Distant Metastasis in the United States
    (2021-06) Alyea, Jennifer Marie; Dixon, Brian E.; Song, Yiqing; Zhang, Jianjun; Hess, Lisa M.; Method, Michael W.
    Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and patients with early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma have a favorable prognosis. Over the past decade, the gynecologic oncology community has debated whether potential harms of systematic lymph node dissection (LND) outweigh potential benefits for these patients. To minimize number of nodes removed, sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is under investigation as an alternative. However, ongoing uncertainty of LND/SLND best practices may result in variations in disease management and discrepant outcomes. Methods Three retrospective cohort studies examined LND/SLND use in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Two examined temporal and geographic variations, respectively, utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 dataset for the years 2004 through 2015. The third used the SEER-Medicare dataset from 2003 through 2016 to quantify and compare the risk of developing 6-month post-surgical lymphedema, lymphocele, hemorrhage, ileus, infection, thrombosis, and all-cause death by number of lymph nodes removed (0, 1-4, 5-9, or 10+). Results Time trend analyses found LND increased from 2004 through 2008, followed by a significant decline through 2015. SLND was rare and did not increase significantly. Significant geographic variation existed for LND use but not SLND. Per 1,000 patients, analyses of 6-month post-surgical complications found 6.5 experienced lymphedema, 3.9 experienced lymphocele, 15.7 experienced hemorrhage, 28.7 experienced ileus, 37.1 experienced infection, 18.6 experienced thrombosis, and 19.8 died. Controlling for size of primary tumor, tumor grade, comorbidities, race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) showed greater risk for ileus (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.24-1.90), infection (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.25-1.83), and thrombosis (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-1.82) when comparing removal of 10+ nodes versus 0 nodes. Conclusion Overall, these studies found significant temporal and geographic variation in LND, as well as increasing risk of post-surgical complications associated with increasing numbers of lymph nodes removed. Should continued research into SLND find strong evidence that it effectively detects cancer spread, patients may benefit through decreased risk of post-surgical ileus, infection, and thrombosis.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University