- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Liver biopsy"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Concordance of Solid Organ Biopsy Diagnoses With Hospital Autopsy and the Contribution of Biopsies to Death(Springer Nature, 2023-01-17) Priemer, David S.; Curran, Joseph M.; Phillips, Carrie L.; Cummings, Oscar W.; Saxena, Romil; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineBiopsies of the liver, lung, and kidney are performed for many indications, including organ dysfunction, mass lesions, and allograft monitoring. The diagnosis depends on the sample, which may or may not be representative of the lesion or pathology in question. Further, biopsies are not without risk of complications. Autopsies are a resource for assessing the accuracy of biopsy diagnoses and evaluating possible complications. Herein, we aimed to compare liver, lung, and kidney biopsy diagnoses with those from autopsies conducted soon after the procedure and to assess the contribution of biopsy to mortality. A 28-year search of our database identified 147 patients who were autopsied after dying within 30 days of a liver, lung, or kidney biopsy. The concordance of the biopsy diagnosis with the autopsy findings was determined. Finally, medical records were reviewed to determine the likelihood that a biopsy contributed to the patient's death. The contribution of the biopsy to death was categorized as "unlikely," "possible," or "probable." Overall concordance between biopsy and autopsy diagnoses was 87% (128/147), including 95% (87/92), 71% (32/45), and 90% (9/10) for liver, lung, and kidney biopsies, respectively. Concordance was lower for biopsies of suspected neoplasms versus non-neoplastic diseases. Lung biopsy concordance was higher for wedge biopsy versus needle or forceps biopsy. A biopsy was determined to at least "possibly" contribute to death in 23 cases (16%). In conclusion, an autopsy is an important tool to validate liver, lung, or kidney biopsy diagnoses. Confirmation of biopsy diagnoses via post-mortem examination may be particularly valuable when patients die soon after the biopsy procedure. Furthermore, an autopsy is especially useful when patients die soon after a biopsy in order to determine what role, if any, the procedure played in their deaths. Though biopsy complications are uncommon, a biopsy may still contribute to or precipitate death in a small number of patients.Item Quantification of the hepatitis B virus cccDNA: evidence-based guidelines for monitoring the key obstacle of HBV cure(BMJ, 2023) Allweiss, Lena; Testoni, Barbara; Yu, Mei; Lucifora, Julie; Ko, Chunkyu; Qu, Bingqian; Lütgehetmann, Marc; Guo, Haitao; Urban, Stephan; Fletcher, Simon P.; Protzer, Ulrike; Levrero, Massimo; Zoulim, Fabien; Dandri, Maura; Microbiology and Immunology, School of MedicineObjectives: A major goal of curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments is the reduction or inactivation of intrahepatic viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Hence, precise cccDNA quantification is essential in preclinical and clinical studies. Southern blot (SB) permits cccDNA visualisation but lacks sensitivity and is very laborious. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has no such limitations but inaccurate quantification due to codetection of viral replicative intermediates (RI) can occur. The use of different samples, preservation conditions, DNA extraction, nuclease digestion methods and qPCR strategies has hindered standardisation. Within the ICE-HBV consortium, available and novel protocols for cccDNA isolation and qPCR quantification in liver tissues and cell cultures were compared in six laboratories to develop evidence-based guidance for best practices. Design: Reference material (HBV-infected humanised mouse livers and HepG2-NTCP cells) was exchanged for cross-validation. Each group compared different DNA extraction methods (Hirt extraction, total DNA extraction with or without proteinase K treatment (+PK/-PK)) and nuclease digestion protocols (plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase (PSD), T5 exonuclease, exonucleases I/III). Samples were analysed by qPCR and SB. Results: Hirt and -PK extraction reduced coexisting RI forms. However, both cccDNA and the protein-free relaxed circular HBV DNA (pf-rcDNA) form were detected by qPCR. T5 and Exo I/III nucleases efficiently removed all RI forms. In contrast, PSD did not digest pf-rcDNA, but was less prone to induce cccDNA overdigestion. In stabilised tissues (eg, Allprotect), nucleases had detrimental effects on cccDNA. Conclusions: We present here a comprehensive evidence-based guidance for optimising, controlling and validating cccDNA measurements using available qPCR assays.Item Role of ductular reaction and ductular-canalicular junctions in identifying severe primary biliary cholangitis(Elsevier, 2022-08-19) Overi, Diletta; Carpino, Guido; Cristoferi, Laura; Onori, Paolo; Kennedy, Lindsey; Francis, Heather; Zucchini, Nicola; Rigamonti, Cristina; Viganò, Mauro; Floreani, Annarosa; D’Amato, Daphne; Gerussi, Alessio; Venere, Rosanna; Alpini, Gianfranco; Glaser, Shannon; Alvaro, Domenico; Invernizzi, Pietro; Gaudio, Eugenio; Cardinale, Vincenzo; Carbone, Marco; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground & aims: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholangiopathy characterised by immuno-mediated injury of interlobular bile ducts leading to intrahepatic cholestasis and progressive liver fibrosis. PBC histology is characterised by portal inflammation, progressive fibrosis, ductopenia, and the appearance of the so-called ductular reaction. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pathogenetic relevance of ductular reaction in PBC. Methods: Liver biopsies were collected from naïve people with PBC (N = 87). Clinical-serological parameters were obtained at diagnosis and after 1 year of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. Histological staging was performed on all slides according to multiple scoring systems and criteria for PBC. Liver samples were obtained from Mdr2 -/- mice treated with or without UDCA. Samples were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. Results: Ductular reaction in people with PBC correlated with the disease stage and liver fibrosis, but not with disease activity; an extensive ductular reaction correlated with serum alkaline phosphatase levels at diagnosis, response to UDCA, and individuals' estimated survival, independently from other histological parameters, including disease stage. In people with PBC, reactive ductules were associated with the establishment of junctions with bile canaliculi and with fibrogenetic cell activation. Consistently, in a mouse model of intrahepatic cholestasis, UDCA treatment was effective in reducing ductular reaction and fibrosis and increasing ductular-canalicular junctions. Conclusions: Extensive ductular reaction outlines a severe histologic phenotype in PBC and is associated with an inadequate therapy response and a worse estimated prognosis. Lay summary: In people affected by primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the histological appearance of extensive ductular reaction identifies individuals at risk of progressive fibrosis. Ductular reaction at diagnosis correlates with the lack of response to first-line therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid and serves to restore ductular-canalicular junctions in people with PBC. Assessing ductular reaction extension at diagnosis may add valuable information for clinicians.