Browsing by Subject "Length of Stay"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of Hospice Use on Costs of Care for Long-Stay Nursing Home Decedents
    (Wiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing), 2016-04) Unroe, Kathleen T.; Sachs, Greg A.; Dennis, M. E.; Hickman, Susan E.; Stump, Timothy E.; Tu, Wanzhu; Callahan, Christopher M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES: To analyze the costs for long-stay (>90 days) nursing home (NH) decedents with and without hospice care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using a 1999-2009 data set of linked Medicare and Medicaid claims and minimum data set (MDS) assessments. SETTING: Indiana NHs. PARTICIPANTS: Long-stay NH decedents (N = 2,510). MEASUREMENTS: Medicare costs were calculated for 2, 7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 days before death; Medicaid costs were calculated for dual-eligible beneficiaries. Total costs and costs for hospice, NH, and inpatient care are reported. RESULTS: Of 2,510 long-stay NH decedents, 35% received hospice. Mean length of hospice was 103 days (median 34 days). Hospice users were more likely to have cancer (P < .001), a do-not-resuscitate order in place (P < .001), greater cognitive impairment (P < .001), and worse activity of daily living (ADL) function (P < .001) and less likely to have had a hospitalization in the year before death (P < .001). In propensity score analyses, hospice users had lower total Medicare costs for all time periods up to and including 90 days before death. For dually eligible beneficiaries, overall costs and Medicare costs were significantly lower for hospice users up to 30 days before death. Medicaid costs were not different between the groups except for the 2-day time period. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of costs to Medicare and Medicaid for long-stay NH decedents, use of hospice did not increase costs in the last 6 months of life. Evidence supporting cost savings is sensitive to analyses that vary the time period before death.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hospice Use Among Nursing Home Patients
    (2013-04) Unroe, Kathleen Tschantz; Sachs, Greg A.; Hickman, Susan E.; Stump, Timothy E.; Tu, Wanzhu; Callahan, Christopher M.
    Objectives Among hospice patients who lived in nursing homes, we sought to: (1) report trends in hospice use over time, (2) describe factors associated with very long hospice stays (>6 months), and (3) describe hospice utilization patterns. Design, setting, and participants We conducted a retrospective study from an urban, Midwest cohort of hospice patients, aged ≥65 years, who lived in nursing homes between 1999 and 2008. Measurements Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and health care utilization were collected from Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, and Minimum Data Set assessments. Patients with overlapping nursing home and hospice stays were identified. χ2 and t tests were used to compare patients with less than or longer than a 6-month hospice stay. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of being on hospice longer than 6 months. Results A total of 1452 patients received hospice services while living in nursing homes. The proportion of patients with noncancer primary hospice diagnoses increased over time; the mean length of hospice stay (114 days) remained high throughout the 10-year period. More than 90% of all patients had 3 or more comorbid diagnoses. Nearly 20% of patients had hospice stays longer than 6 months. The hospice patients with stays longer than 6 months were observed to have a smaller percentage of cancer (25% vs 30%) as a primary hospice diagnosis. The two groups did not differ by mean cognitive status scores, number of comorbidities, or activities of daily living impairments. The greater than 6 months group was much more likely to disenroll before death: 33.9% compared with 13.8% (P < .0001). A variety of patterns of utilization of hospice across settings were observed; 21 % of patients spent some of their hospice stay in the community. Conclusions Any policy proposals that impact the hospice benefit in nursing homes should take into account the difficulty in predicting the clinical course of these patients, varying utilization patterns and transitions across settings, and the importance of supporting multiple approaches for delivery of palliative care in this setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Readmissions in Older Adults
    (2020-08) Hodge, Kimberly Sue; Fulton, Janet; Ebright, Patricia; Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn; Huber, Lesa
    Hospital readmission is of growing importance in the healthcare industry because of associated patient and system costs, impact to the quality of patient care, and hospital Medicare payment penalties. The increasing interest in sepsis readmission prevention has highlighted the uniqueness of severe sepsis or septic shock survivors. The results of this study provide insight into the relationship between index hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmissions for older adults (> 65 years) who discharged home from an index hospital with a principle or secondary discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between index hospital LOS and 30-day readmissions in older adults (> 65 years) whose expected primary payer was Medicare and who discharged home with a principle or secondary diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Data used to answer the proposed research questions consisted of older adult discharge records from the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Differences in 30-day readmissions between older adult age groups, gender, and older adult location were examined. The number of days to readmission since discharge was evaluated for the subset of older adults with a readmission. Approximately 15.6% of older adults were readmitted within 30 days of their discharge. Readmissions were statistically different based on the older adult’s age, gender, and LOS. Location did not have a significant effect on readmissions. Mean LOS among readmitted older adults was 10.1 days. Analysis indicates that an older adult’s LOS had a significant effect on readmissions, although models performed poorly. Findings suggest that there are certain factors that can predict older adults who are at risk for being readmitted after being discharged with a principle or secondary discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock.