Browsing by Subject "Laparotomy"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Novel Use of a Schanz Pin-Rectal Foreign Body Extraction: A Case Report
    (JOCR, 2024) Chang, Joshua H.; Haag, Luke; Mohanty, Sanjay; Natoli, Roman M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) can be difficult to extract, forcing the surgeon to get creative. This is the first case report utilizing orthopedic drilling and joystick manipulation techniques for foreign body extraction. Case report: A 63-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a pool ball in his rectum for two days. Extraction attempts under anesthesia both transanally and through a low midline laparotomy were unsuccessful due to the patient's pelvic anatomy. Orthopedic surgery was consulted to see if any manipulation or resection of the pelvis might aid in extraction. Ultimately, a Schanz pin was drilled retrogradely from the rectum into the pool ball and successfully manipulated the pool ball out of the patient. Conclusion: Techniques such as drilling and joystick manipulation are common in orthopedic surgery but rarely used in other surgical fields. This case presented a novel use of a Schanz pin in RFB extraction. Application of orthopedic surgical technique in a colorectal surgery in this case saved the patient from more invasive interventions such as pubic symphysiotomy or ischial tuberosity resection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dual antibiotic prevention bundle is associated with decreased surgical site infections
    (BMJ, 2020-09) Kuznicki, Michelle; Mallen, Adrianne; McClung, Emily Clair; Robertson, Sharon E.; Todd, Sarah; Boulware, David; Martin, Stacy; Quilitz, Rod; Vargas, Roberto J.; Apte, Sachin M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Gynecologic oncology surgery is associated with a wide variation in surgical site infection risk. The optimal method for infection prevention in this heterogeneous population remains uncertain. Study design: A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare surgical site infection rates for patients undergoing hysterectomy over a 1-year period surrounding the implementation of an institutional infection prevention bundle. The bundle comprised pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative interventions including a dual-agent antibiotic surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin and metronidazole. Cohorts consisted of patients undergoing surgery during the 6 months prior to this intervention (pre-bundle) versus those undergoing surgery during the 6 months following the intervention (post-bundle). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, readmission rates, compliance measures, and infection microbiology. Data were compared with pre-specified one-sided exact test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. Results: A total of 358 patients were included (178 PRE, 180 POST). Median age was 58 (range 23-90) years. The post-bundle cohort had a 58% reduction in surgical site infection rate, 3.3% POST vs 7.9% PRE (-4.5%, 95% CI -9.3% to -0.2%, p=0.049) as well as reductions in organ space infection, 0.6% POST vs 4.5% PRE (-3.9%, 95% CI -7.2% to -0.7%, p=0.019), and readmission rates, 2.2% POST vs 6.7% PRE (-4.5%, 95% CI -8.7% to -0.2%, p=0.04). Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria were all prevalent in surgical site infection cultures. There were no monomicrobial infections in post-cohort cultures (0% POST vs 58% PRE, p=0.04). No infections contained methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion: Implementation of a dual antibiotic infection prevention bundle was associated with a 58% reduction in surgical site infection rate after hysterectomy in a surgically diverse gynecologic oncology practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
    (Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2020-04-17) Ramchandani, Neal K.; Kesler, Kenneth A.; Rogers, Jonathon D.; Valsangkar, Nakul; Stokes, Samatha M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    We describe a novel esophagogastric anastomotic technique ("side-to-side: staple line-on-staple line", STS) for intrathoracic anastomoses designed to create a large diameter anastomosis while simultaneously maintaining conduit blood supply. This technique aims to minimize the incidence of anastomotic leaks and strictures, which is a frequent source of morbidity and occasional mortality after esophagectomy. We analyze the results of this STS technique on 368 patients and compared outcomes to 112 patients who underwent esophagogastric anastomoses using an end-to-end stapler (EEA) over an 8-year time interval at our institution. The STS technique involves aligning the remaining intrathoracic esophagus over the tip of the lesser curve staple line of a stomach tube, created as a replacement conduit for the esophagus. A linear stapling device cuts through and restaples the conduit staple line to the lateral wall of the esophagus in a side-to-side fashion. The open common lumen is then closed in two layers of sutures. There was a total of 12 (3.8%) anastomotic leaks in patients who underwent STS esophagogastric anastomosis. Two of eight patients (25%) had anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for end-stage achalasia as compared to a 2.8% leak rate (10/336) after esophagectomy for other conditions. Eighteen (5.2%) patients required a median of 2 dilatations for anastomotic stricture after STS anastomosis. Supplemental jejunostomy feedings were required in only 11.1% of patients undergoing STS anastomoses following hospital discharge. In contrast, patients undergoing EEA anastomoses demonstrated anastomotic leak and stricture rates of 16.1% and 14.3% respectively (p<0.01). Time analysis of postoperative contrast studies following the STS technique typically demonstrated a straight/uniform diameter conduit with essentially complete contrast emptying into the small bowel within 3 minutes in 88.4% of patients. The incidence of esophagogastric anastomotic leaks and strictures were extremely low using this novel anastomotic technique. Additionally we believe that based on time and qualitative analyses of postoperative contrast studies, this technique appears to optimize postoperative upper gastrointestinal tract function; however, further comparative studies are needed.