Browsing by Subject "Laparoscopy"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Association of Nonoperative Management Using Antibiotic Therapy vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Treatment Success and Disability Days in Children With Uncomplicated Appendicitis(American Medical Association, 2020-08) Minneci, Peter C.; Hade, Erinn M.; Lawrence, Amy E.; Sebastião, Yuri V.; Saito, Jacqueline M.; Mak, Grace Z.; Fox, Christa; Hirschl, Ronald B.; Gadepalli, Samir; Helmrath, Michael A.; Kohler, Jonathan E.; Leys, Charles M.; Sato, Thomas T.; Lal, Dave R.; Landman, Matthew P.; Kabre, Rashmi; Fallat, Mary E.; Cooper, Jennifer N.; Deans, Katherine J.; Surgery, School of MedicineImportance: Nonoperative management with antibiotics alone has the potential to treat uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with fewer disability days than surgery. Objective: To determine the success rate of nonoperative management and compare differences in treatment-related disability, satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and complications between nonoperative management and surgery in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Design, setting, and participants: Multi-institutional nonrandomized controlled intervention study of 1068 children aged 7 through 17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis treated at 10 tertiary children's hospitals across 7 US states between May 2015 and October 2018 with 1-year follow-up through October 2019. Of the 1209 eligible patients approached, 1068 enrolled in the study. Interventions: Patient and family selection of nonoperative management with antibiotics alone (nonoperative group, n = 370) or urgent (≤12 hours of admission) laparoscopic appendectomy (surgery group, n = 698). Main outcomes and measures: The 2 primary outcomes assessed at 1 year were disability days, defined as the total number of days the child was not able to participate in all of his/her normal activities secondary to appendicitis-related care (expected difference, 5 days), and success rate of nonoperative management, defined as the proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively who did not undergo appendectomy by 1 year (lowest acceptable success rate, ≥70%). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences between treatment groups for all outcome assessments. Results: Among 1068 patients who were enrolled (median age, 12.4 years; 38% girls), 370 (35%) chose nonoperative management and 698 (65%) chose surgery. A total of 806 (75%) had complete follow-up: 284 (77%) in the nonoperative group; 522 (75%) in the surgery group. Patients in the nonoperative group were more often younger (median age, 12.3 years vs 12.5 years), Black (9.6% vs 4.9%) or other race (14.6% vs 8.7%), had caregivers with a bachelor's degree (29.8% vs 23.5%), and underwent diagnostic ultrasound (79.7% vs 74.5%). After IPTW, the success rate of nonoperative management at 1 year was 67.1% (96% CI, 61.5%-72.31%; P = .86). Nonoperative management was associated with significantly fewer patient disability days at 1 year than did surgery (adjusted mean, 6.6 vs 10.9 days; mean difference, -4.3 days (99% CI, -6.17 to -2.43; P < .001). Of 16 other prespecified secondary end points, 10 showed no significant difference. Conclusion and relevance: Among children with uncomplicated appendicitis, an initial nonoperative management strategy with antibiotics alone had a success rate of 67.1% and, compared with urgent surgery, was associated with statistically significantly fewer disability days at 1 year. However, there was substantial loss to follow-up, the comparison with the prespecified threshold for an acceptable success rate of nonoperative management was not statistically significant, and the hypothesized difference in disability days was not met.Item Chylous ascites in the setting of internal hernia: a reassuring sign(Springer, 2022-04) Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.; Carr, Rosalie A.; Painter, Robert; Selzer, Don; Lee, Nicole Kissane; Banerjee, Ambar; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Choi, Jennifer N.; Surgery, School of MedicineBACKGROUND: Chylous ascites is often reported in cases with lymphatic obstruction or after lymphatic injuries such as intraabdominal malignancies or lymphadenectomies. However, chylous ascites is also frequently encountered in operations for internal hernias. We sought to characterize the frequency and conditions when chylous ascites is encountered in general surgery patients. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent operations for CPT codes related to open and laparoscopic abdominal and gastrointestinal surgery in our tertiary hospital from 2010 to 2019 were reviewed. Patients with the postoperative diagnosis of internal hernia were identified and categorized into three groups: Internal Hernia with chylous ascites, non-chylous ascites, and no ascites. Demographics, prior surgical history, CT findings, source of internal hernia, open or laparoscopic surgery, and preoperative labs were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were found to have internal hernias and were included in our study. 80.3% were female and 86% had a previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure (RYGBP). Laparoscopy was the main approach for all groups. Ascites was present in 46% of the cases. Specifically, chylous ascites was observed in 27% of the total operations and was exclusively (100%) found in patients with gastric-bypass history. Furthermore, it was more commonly associated with Petersen's defect (p < 0.001), while the non-chylous fluid group was associated with herniation through the mesenteric defect (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chylous ascites is a common finding during internal hernia operations. Unlike other more morbid conditions, identification of chylous ascites during an internal hernia operation appears innocuous. However, in the context of a patient with a history of RYGBP, the presence of chylous fluid signifies the associated small bowel obstruction is likely related to an internal hernia through a patent Petersen's defect.Item Comparison of Laparoscopy Training Using the Box Trainer Versus the Virtual Trainer(Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2010-04) Mohammadi, Yousef; Lerner, Michelle A.; Sethi, Amanjot S.; Sundaram, Chandru P.; Urology, School of MedicineBackground and Objectives: To evaluate whether training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves the performance on a laparoscopic box trainer. Methods: Twenty-six subjects were trained using a box trainer, and 17 participants were trained using a virtual simulator. Participants in the experimental group completed 1 session of 5 exercises on the box trainer, 4 sessions on the virtual simulator, and a final session on the box trainer. Participants in the control group completed 6 sessions of 5 exercises on the box trainer alone. Exercises were monitored and scored for time and accuracy. Participants completed a self-evaluation survey after each session and a user satisfaction questionnaire at the end of the training. Results: No significant difference existed between the 2 groups in improvement of accuracy. Pegboard time (P=0.0110) and pattern cutting time (P=0.0229) were the only exercise parameters that improved significantly more in the control group compared with the experimental group. The experimental group developed more interest in a surgical field as a result of their experience than the control group did (70.6% vs 53.8%, respectively). Conclusion: The virtual simulator is a reasonable alternative to the box trainer for laparoscopic skills training.Item Comparison of Robot-Assisted Nephrectomy with Laparoscopic and Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy(Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2010-07) Boger, Michelle; Lucas, Steven M.; Popp, Sara C.; Gardner, Thomas A.; Sundaram, Chandru P.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective: To compare the initial perioperative outcomes of our robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomies with laparoscopic and hand-assisted nephrectomies performed by 2 experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent laparoscopic (LN), hand-assisted (HALN), and robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (RALN) for benign and malignant diseases between August 2006 and December 2008. Data collected included patient age, body mass index, operative times, estimated blood loss, complications, and hospital stay. Radical nephrectomy was performed for renal neoplasms, and simple nephrectomy was performed for suspected benign diseases. In addition, average direct costs and total costs were calculated for each laparoscopic approach. Results: Forty-six patients underwent LN, 20 underwent HALN, and 13 underwent RALN. The median operative time was 171, 210, and 168 minutes, respectively. LN, HALN, and RALN groups had similar median EBL [(100mL (IQR=113mL), 100mL (IQR=150mL), and 100mL (IQR=125mL); P=0.695], length of hospital stay [2.0d (IQR=1.0d), 3.0d (IQR=2.0d), and 2.0d (IQR=3.0d); P=0.233], and postoperative morphine equivalent analgesic requirements [33mg (IQR=43mg), 45mg (IQR=50mg), and 30mg (IQR=16mg); P=0.766]. Three patients (6%) in the LN group had complications, 2 (10%) in the HALN group had complications, and 4 (30%) in the RALN group had complications. The average total direct operating room costs were $5,500, $6,979, and $6,869 for the LN, HALN, and RALN groups, respectively. Conclusions: Early experience with robotic assistance for radical and simple nephrectomy offers no significant advantage over traditional laparoscopic or hand-assisted approaches. It was also more costly.Item From the Dexterous Surgical Skill to the Battlefield-A Robotics Exploratory Study(Oxford University Press, 2021) Gonzalez, Glebys T.; Kaur, Upinder; Rahma, Masudur; Venkatesh, Vishnunandan; Sanchez, Natalia; Hager, Gregory; Xue, Yexiang; Voyles, Richard; Wachs, Juan; Surgery, School of MedicineIntroduction: Short response time is critical for future military medical operations in austere settings or remote areas. Such effective patient care at the point of injury can greatly benefit from the integration of semi-autonomous robotic systems. To achieve autonomy, robots would require massive libraries of maneuvers collected with the goal of training machine learning algorithms. Although this is attainable in controlled settings, obtaining surgical data in austere settings can be difficult. Hence, in this article, we present the Dexterous Surgical Skill (DESK) database for knowledge transfer between robots. The peg transfer task was selected as it is one of the six main tasks of laparoscopic training. In addition, we provide a machine learning framework to evaluate novel transfer learning methodologies on this database. Methods: A set of surgical gestures was collected for a peg transfer task, composed of seven atomic maneuvers referred to as surgemes. The collected Dexterous Surgical Skill dataset comprises a set of surgical robotic skills using the four robotic platforms: Taurus II, simulated Taurus II, YuMi, and the da Vinci Research Kit. Then, we explored two different learning scenarios: no-transfer and domain-transfer. In the no-transfer scenario, the training and testing data were obtained from the same domain; whereas in the domain-transfer scenario, the training data are a blend of simulated and real robot data, which are tested on a real robot. Results: Using simulation data to train the learning algorithms enhances the performance on the real robot where limited or no real data are available. The transfer model showed an accuracy of 81% for the YuMi robot when the ratio of real-tosimulated data were 22% to 78%. For the Taurus II and the da Vinci, the model showed an accuracy of 97.5% and 93%, respectively, training only with simulation data. Conclusions: The results indicate that simulation can be used to augment training data to enhance the performance of learned models in real scenarios. This shows potential for the future use of surgical data from the operating room in deployable surgical robots in remote areas.Item High Rates of Nicotine Use Relapse and Ulcer Development Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass(Springer, 2021-02) Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.; Christodoulides, Alexei; Monfared, Sara; Hilgendorf, William; Embry, Marisa; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Surgery, School of MedicinePURPOSE: Given that smoking is known to contribute to gastrojejunal anastomotic (GJA) ulcers, cessation is recommended prior to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). However, smoking relapse rates and the exact ulcer risk remain unknown. This study aimed to define smoking relapse, risk of GJA ulceration, and complications after LRYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary LRYGB during 2011-2015. Initially, three patient categories were identified: lifetime non-smokers, patients who were smoking during the initial visit at the bariatric clinic or within the prior year (recent smokers), and patients who had ceased smoking more than a year prior to their initial clinic visit (former smokers). Smoking relapse, GJA ulcer occurrences, reinterventions, and reoperations were recorded and compared. RESULTS: A total of 766 patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, 53 (64.6%) recent smokers had resumed smoking. Out of these relapsed smokers, 51% developed GJA ulcers compared with 14.8% in non-relapsed recent smokers, 16.1% in former smokers, and 6% in lifetime nonsmokers (p < 0.001). Furthermore, relapsed smokers required more frequently endoscopic reinterventions (60.4%) compared with non-relapsed smokers (20.8%, p < 0.001), former smokers (20.7%, p < 0.001), and lifetime non-smokers (15.4%, p < 0.001). Additionally, relapsed smokers required a reoperation (18.9%) more often than non-relapsed recent smokers (5.7%, p < 0.001) and lifetime non-smokers (1.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Smokers relapse frequently after LRYGB, and the majority experience GJA complications. They should be counseled about this risk preoperatively and directed towards less ulcerogenic procedures when possible. Alternatively, longer periods of preoperative smoking abstinence might be needed.Item Outcomes in Endoscopic and Operative Transgastric Pancreatic Debridement(Wolters Kluwer, 2021) Maatman, Thomas K.; McGuire, Sean P.; Flick, Katelyn F.; Madison, Mackenzie K.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.; Bick, Benjamin L.; Ceppa, Eugene P.; DeWitt, John M.; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Fogel, Evan L.; Gromski, Mark A.; House, Michael G.; Lehman, Glen A.; Nakeeb, Attila; Schmidt, C. Max; Sherman, Stuart; Watkins, James L.; Zyromski, Nicholas J.; Surgery, School of MedicineObjectives: Select patients with anatomically favorable walled off pancreatic necrosis may be treated by endoscopic (Endo-TGD) or operative (OR-TGD) transgastric debridement (TGD). We compared our experience with these 2 approaches. Summary background data: Select necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) patients are suitable for TGD which may be accomplished endoscopically or surgically. Limited experience exists contrasting these techniques exists. Methods: Patients undergoing Endo-TGD and OR-TGD at a single, high-volume pancreatic center between 2008 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes of these 2 groups were compared. Results: Among 498 NP patients undergoing necrosis intervention, 160 (32%) had TGD: 59 Endo-TGD and 101 OR-TGD. The groups were statistically similar in age, comorbidity, pancreatitis etiology, necrosis anatomy, pancreatitis severity, and timing of TGD from pancreatitis insult. OR-TGD required 1.1 ± 0.5 and Endo-TGD 3.0 ± 2.0 debridements/patient. Fewer hospital readmissions and repeat necrosis interventions, and shorter total inpatient length of stay were observed in OR-TGD patients. New-onset organ failure [Endo-TGD (13%); OR-TGD (13%); P = 1.0] was similar between groups. Hospital length of stay after TGD was significantly longer in patients undergoing Endo-TGD (13.8 ± 20.8 days) compared to OR-TGD (9.4 ± 6.1 days; P = 0.047). Mortality was 7% in Endo-TGD and 1% in OR-TGD (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Operative and endoscopic transgastric debridement achieve necrosis resolution with different temporal and procedural profiles. Clear multidisciplinary communication is essential to determine appropriate approach to individual necrotizing pancreatitis patients.Item SAGES 2022 guidelines regarding the use of laparoscopy in the era of COVID-19(Springer Nature, 2022) Collings, Amelia T.; Jeyarajah, D. Rohan; Hanna, Nader M.; Dort, Jonathan; Tsuda, Shawn; Nepal, Pramod; Lim, Robert; Lin, Chelsea; Hong, Julie S.; Ansari, Mohammed T.; Slater, Bethany J.; Pryor, Aurora D.; Kohn, Geoffrey P.; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: SARS-CoV-2 has changed global healthcare since the pandemic began in 2020. The safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilizing insufflation from the standpoint of safety to the operating room personnel is currently being explored. The aims of this guideline are to examine the existing evidence to provide guidance regarding MIS for the patient with, or suspecting of having, the SARS-CoV-2 as well as the healthcare team involved. Methods: Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 2 key questions (KQ) regarding the safety of MIS in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis criteria. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using a narrative synthesis of the literature by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. Results: In KQ1, a total of 1361 articles were reviewed, with 2 articles meeting inclusion. In KQ2, a total of 977 articles were reviewed, with 4 articles met inclusions criteria, of which 2 studies reported on the SARS-CoV2 virus specifically. Despite many publications in the field, very little well-controlled and unbiased data exist to inform the recommendations. Of that which is available, it shows that both laparoscopic and open operations in Covid-positive patients had similar rates of OR staff positivity rates; however, patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures had a lower perioperative mortality than open procedures. Also, SARS-CoV-2 particles have been detected in the surgical plume at laparoscopy. Conclusion: With demonstrated equivalence of operating room staff exposure, and noninferiority of laparoscopic access with respect to mortality, either laparoscopic or open approaches to abdominal operations may be used in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Measures should be employed for all laparoscopic or open cases to prevent exposure of operating room staff to the surgical plume, as virus can be present in this plume.