Browsing by Subject "Kidney transplantation"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 25
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adenovirus-Related Fulminant Liver Failure After Kidney Transplantation
    (International Scientific Information, 2022-08-06) Mihaylov, Plamen; Lutz, Andrew J.; Oppliger, Federico; Lin, Jingmei; Surgery, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Human adenovirus is a well-known pathogen that can potentially lead to severe infection in immunocompromised patients. Adenovirus infections in solid-organ transplant recipients can range from asymptomatic to severe, prolonged, disseminated disease, and have a significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and graft survival. The clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic and flu-like illness to severe life-threatening viremia with multi-organ failure. Post-transplant adenovirus infection is well described in kidney recipients, but in adult liver transplant recipients the impact of the virus is not well described. In this report, a case of disseminated adenovirus infection with subsequent fatal acute liver failure in a post-kidney transplant patient is presented. CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old man underwent a deceased kidney transplantation for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Shortly after the kidney transplantation, he received multiple plasmapheresis with additional steroid treatments for cellular rejection and reoccurrence of his primary kidney disease. Three weeks after the kidney transplant, he developed a disseminated adenovirus infection with subsequent acute liver failure. Despite the early diagnosis and aggressive treatment, the patient died. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with organ transplantation with autoimmune background etiology are usually over-immunosuppressed to avoid early rejection. In this population, opportunistic infections are not rare. Fever, general malaise, and transplant organ dysfunction are the first signs of bacterial or viral infection. Early infectious diseases work-up, including tissue biopsy, is fundamental to establish a diagnosis. Broad antibiotic and possible antiviral aggressive treatment are mandatory.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Baseline Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to Transplantation in Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Payment Model
    (Elsevier, 2023-12-15) Drewry, Kelsey M.; Mora, Ariana N.; Kim, Daeho; Koukounas, Kalli; Wilk, Adam S.; Trivedi, Amal N.; Patzer, Rachel E.; Surgery, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Crystalglobulinemia causing cutaneous vasculopathy and acute nephropathy in a kidney transplant patient
    (Elsevier, 2021) Wilson, Chase; Phillips, Carrie L.; Klenk, Alison; Kuhar, Matthew; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Dermatology, School of Medicine
    We present a rare case of crystalglobulinemia causing cutaneous vasculopathy and acute nephropathy in a 66-year-old female kidney transplant recipient. The patient presented with acute kidney injury (AKI), volume overload, anuria, retiform purpura, and blue-black necrosis of her toes. She received a living kidney transplant 7 months earlier with baseline creatinine of 0.6 mg/dl. Transplant kidney biopsy showed massive pseudo-thrombi filling glomerular capillary lumina. Electron microscopy of thrombi revealed an ultrastructural crystalline pattern of linear and curvilinear bundles with ladder-like periodicity typical of crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy. Similar crystalline pseudo-thrombi were detected ultrastructurally in a skin biopsy specimen, indicating systemic involvement. She required several sessions of hemodialysis. Plasmapheresis was initiated to decrease the number of circulating crystalglobulins. In order to treat the underlying paraproteinemia, the patient was started on bortezomib and dexamethasone. After treatment with five cycles of bortezomib, the patient's free kappa to lambda ratio improved to 2.35 from 5.52. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and the cutaneous vasculopathy gradually improved with treatment. This is an extremely rare occurrence of crystalglobulin in a living kidney transplant recipient.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cutaneous presentation of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis nine years after renal transplantation
    (Wiley, 2013) Rosado-Odom, Vera M.; Daoud, Jacques; Johnson, Raymond; Allen, Stephen D.; Lockhart, Shawn R.; Iqbal, Naureen; Shieh, Wun-Ju; Zaki, Sherif; Sharfuddin, Asif; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Initial presentation of invasive fungal infections such as histoplasmosis can include non-specific clinical manifestations, especially in immunocompromised patients. A high index of suspicion is required to identify atypical manifestations of these diseases, which carry a high risk of mortality, if the diagnosis is delayed or missed. We describe a case of a kidney transplant recipient with cutaneous lesions as initial manifestation of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis where a skin biopsy was crucial to an early diagnosis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Discrepant Outcomes between National Kidney Transplant Data Registries in the United States
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Yu, Miko; King, Kristen L.; Husain, S. Ali; Huml, Anne M.; Patzer, Rachel E.; Schold, Jesse D.; Mohan, Sumit; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Significance statement: Effects of reduced access to external data by transplant registries to improve accuracy and completeness of the collected data are compounded by different data management processes at three US organizations that maintain kidney transplant-related datasets. This analysis suggests that the datasets have large differences in reported outcomes that vary across different subsets of patients. These differences, along with recent disclosure of previously missing outcomes data, raise important questions about completeness of the outcome measures. Differences in recorded deaths seem to be increasing in recent years, reflecting the adverse effects of restricted access to external data sources. Although these registries are invaluable sources for the transplant community, discrepancies and incomplete reporting risk undermining their value for future analyses, particularly when used for developing national transplant policy or regulatory measures. Background: Central to a transplant registry's quality are accuracy and completeness of the clinical information being captured, especially for important outcomes, such as graft failure or death. Effects of more limited access to external sources of death data for transplant registries are compounded by different data management processes at the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Methods: This cross-sectional registry study examined differences in reported deaths among kidney transplant candidates and recipients of kidneys from deceased and living donors in 2000 through 2019 in three transplant datasets on the basis of data current as of 2020. We assessed annual death rates and survival estimates to visualize trends in reported deaths between sources. Results: The UNOS dataset included 77,605 deaths among 315,346 recipients and 61,249 deaths among 275,000 nonpreemptively waitlisted candidates who were never transplanted. The SRTR dataset included 87,149 deaths among 315,152 recipients and 60,042 deaths among 259,584 waitlisted candidates. The USRDS dataset included 89,515 deaths among 311,955 candidates and 63,577 deaths among 238,167 waitlisted candidates. Annual death rates among the prevalent transplant population show accumulating differences across datasets-2.31%, 4.00%, and 4.03% by 2019 from UNOS, SRTR, and USRDS, respectively. Long-term survival outcomes were similar among nonpreemptively waitlisted candidates but showed more than 10% discordance between USRDS and UNOS among transplanted patients. Conclusions: Large differences in reported patient outcomes across datasets seem to be increasing, raising questions about their completeness. Understanding the differences between these datasets is essential for accurate, reliable interpretation of analyses that use these data for policy development, regulatory oversight, and research. Podcast: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2023_10_24_JASN0000000000000194.mp3.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Disentangling Dialysis Facility and Transplant Center Factors on Evaluation Start Following Referral for Kidney Transplantation: A Regional Study in the United States
    (Elsevier, 2025-02-07) McPherson, Laura; Plantinga, Laura C.; Howards, Penelope P.; Kramer, Michael; Patzer, Rachel E.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Rationale & objective: Little is known about the relative importance of dialysis facilities and transplant centers on variability in starting an evaluation among patients referred for kidney transplant. The primary objective of this study was to leverage cross-classified multilevel modeling to simultaneously examine the contextual effects of dialysis facilities and transplant centers on variation in the start of the transplant evaluation process. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & participants: Dialysis patients referred for kidney transplant to transplant centers across the Southeast, Northeast, New York, or Ohio River Valley US regions from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, were identified from the United States Renal Data System and the Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry and followed through June 30, 2021. A total of N=25,488 referred patients were nested with 1,720 dialysis facilities and 26 transplant centers. Outcomes: Starting an evaluation for kidney transplant at a transplant center within 6 months of referral. Analytical approach: A series of multilevel models were performed to estimate the variability in starting an evaluation for kidney transplant within 6 months of referral. The between-dialysis facility and/or transplant center variation in starting an evaluation was quantified using the median OR. Results: Among 25,488 dialysis patients referred for kidney transplantation, 51% of patients started an evaluation at a transplant center within 6 months of referral. In multilevel models, the median OR between transplant centers was higher (indicating higher unexplained variability) than the dialysis facility median OR, regardless of measured patient, dialysis facility, and transplant center characteristics. Limitations: Early transplant access data was limited to 20 of 48 transplant centers across these 4 regions. Conclusions: When taking dialysis facilities and transplant centers into account, variation in starting an evaluation for kidney transplant appeared at both the dialysis facility and transplant center-level but was more apparent among transplant centers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of a Novel Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Patient Access to Kidney Transplant and Living Kidney Donation: The EnAKT LKD Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
    (American Medical Association, 2023) Garg, Amit X.; Yohanna, Seychelle; Naylor, Kyla L.; McKenzie, Susan Q.; Mucsi, Istvan; Dixon, Stephanie N.; Luo, Bin; Sontrop, Jessica M.; Beaucage, Mary; Belenko, Dmitri; Coghlan, Candice; Cooper, Rebecca; Elliott, Lori; Getchell, Leah; Heale, Esti; Ki, Vincent; Nesrallah, Gihad; Patzer, Rachel E.; Presseau, Justin; Reich, Marian; Treleaven, Darin; Wang, Carol; Waterman, Amy D.; Zaltzman, Jeffrey; Blake, Peter G.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Importance: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have the best chance for a longer and healthier life if they receive a kidney transplant. However, many barriers prevent patients from receiving a transplant. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of a multicomponent intervention designed to target several barriers that prevent eligible patients from completing key steps toward receiving a kidney transplant. Design, setting, and participants: This pragmatic, 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label, registry-based, superiority, cluster randomized clinical trial included all 26 CKD programs in Ontario, Canada, from November 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. These programs provide care for patients with advanced CKD (patients approaching the need for dialysis or receiving maintenance dialysis). Interventions: Using stratified, covariate-constrained randomization, allocation of the CKD programs at a 1:1 ratio was used to compare the multicomponent intervention vs usual care for 4.2 years. The intervention had 4 main components, (1) administrative support to establish local quality improvement teams; (2) transplant educational resources; (3) an initiative for transplant recipients and living donors to share stories and experiences; and (4) program-level performance reports and oversight by administrative leaders. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the rate of steps completed toward receiving a kidney transplant. Each patient could complete up to 4 steps: step 1, referred to a transplant center for evaluation; step 2, had a potential living donor contact a transplant center for evaluation; step 3, added to the deceased donor waitlist; and step 4, received a transplant from a living or deceased donor. Results: The 26 CKD programs (13 intervention, 13 usual care) during the trial period included 20 375 potentially transplant-eligible patients with advanced CKD (intervention group [n = 9780 patients], usual-care group [n = 10 595 patients]). Despite evidence of intervention uptake, the step completion rate did not significantly differ between the intervention vs usual-care groups: 5334 vs 5638 steps; 24.8 vs 24.1 steps per 100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.87-1.15). Conclusions and relevance: This novel multicomponent intervention did not significantly increase the rate of completed steps toward receiving a kidney transplant. Improving access to transplantation remains a global priority that requires substantial effort.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Epidemiology of parvovirus B19 and anemia among kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-06-10) Thongprayoon, Charat; Khoury, Nadeen J.; Bathini, Tarun; Aeddula, Narothama Reddy; Boonpheng, Boonphiphop; Lertjitbanjong, Ploypin; Watthanasuntorn, Kanramon; Leeaphorn, Napat; Chesdachai, Supavit; Torres-Ortiz, Aldo; Kaewput, Wisit; Bruminhent, Jackrapong; Mao, Michael A.; Cheungpasitporn, Wisit; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Persistent anemia has been described in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients with parvovirus B19 virus infection. However, the epidemiology of parvovirus B19 and parvovirus B19-related anemia after KTx remains unclear. We conducted this systematic review (1) to investigate the incidence of parvovirus B19 infection after KTx and (2) to assess the incidence of parvovirus B19 among KTx patients with anemia. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2019 to identify studies that reported the incidence rate of parvovirus B19 infection and/or seroprevalence of parvovirus B19 in KTx recipients. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42019125716). Results: Nineteen observational studies with a total of 2108 KTx patients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated seroprevalence of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin G was 62.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.8%–76.1%). The pooled estimated incidence rate of positive parvovirus B19 DNA in the 1st year after KTx was 10.3% (95% CI: 5.5%–18.4%). After sensitivity analysis excluded a study that solely included KTx patients with anemia, the pooled estimated incidence rate of positive parvovirus B19 DNA after KTx was 7.6% (95% CI: 3.7%–15.0%). Among KTx with anemia, the pooled estimated incidence rate of positive parvovirus B19 DNA was 27.4% (95% CI: 16.6%–41.7%). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated no significant correlations between the year of study and the incidence rate of positive parvovirus B19 DNA (P = 0.33). Egger's regression asymmetry test was performed and demonstrated no publication bias in all analyses. Conclusion: The overall estimated incidence of positive parvovirus B19 DNA after KTX is 10.3%. Among KTx with anemia, the incidence rate of positive parvovirus B19 DNA is 27.4%. The incidence of positive parvovirus B19 DNA does not seem to decrease overtime.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Epimeric vitamin D and cardiovascular structure and function in advanced CKD and after kidney transplantation
    (Oxford University Press, 2024) Arroyo, Eliott; Leber, Cecilia A.; Burney, Heather N.; Li, Yang; Li, Xiaochun; Lu, Tzong-shi; Jones, Glenville; Kaufmann, Martin; Ting, Stephen M. S.; Hiemstra, Thomas F.; Zehnder, Daniel; Lim, Kenneth; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: 25-hydroxyvitamin D can undergo C-3 epimerization to produce 3-epi-25(OH)D3. 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels decline in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but its role in regulating the cardiovascular system is unknown. Herein, we examined the relationship between 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and cardiovascular functional and structural endpoints in patients with CKD. Methods: We examined n = 165 patients with advanced CKD from the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Renal Failure and After Kidney Transplantation (CAPER) study cohort, including those who underwent kidney transplant (KTR, n = 76) and waitlisted patients who did not (NTWC, n = 89). All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiography at baseline, 2 months and 12 months. Serum 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Patients were stratified into quartiles of baseline 3-epi-25(OH)D3 (Q1: <0.4 ng/mL, n = 51; Q2: 0.4 ng/mL, n = 26; Q3: 0.5-0.7 ng/mL, n = 47; Q4: ≥0.8 ng/mL, n = 41). Patients in Q1 exhibited lower peak oxygen uptake [VO2Peak = 18.4 (16.2-20.8) mL/min/kg] compared with Q4 [20.8 (18.6-23.2) mL/min/kg; P = .009]. Linear mixed regression model showed that 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels increased in KTR [from 0.47 (0.30) ng/mL to 0.90 (0.45) ng/mL] and declined in NTWC [from 0.61 (0.32) ng/mL to 0.45 (0.29) ng/mL; P < .001]. Serum 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was associated with VO2Peak longitudinally in both groups [KTR: β (standard error) = 2.53 (0.56), P < .001; NTWC: 2.73 (0.70), P < .001], but was not with left ventricular mass or arterial stiffness. Non-epimeric 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3 and the 25(OH)D3:24,25(OH)2D3 ratio were not associated with any cardiovascular outcome (all P > .05). Conclusions: Changes in 3-epi-25(OH)D3 levels may regulate cardiovascular functional capacity in patients with advanced CKD.