Browsing by Subject "Ixazomib"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in routine clinical practice: effectiveness in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
    (Taylor & Francis, 2021) Hájek, Roman; Minařík, Jiří; Straub, Jan; Pour, Luděk; Jungova, Alexandra; Berdeja, Jesus G.; Boccadoro, Mario; Brozova, Lucie; Spencer, Andrew; van Rhee, Frits; Vela-Ojeda, Jorge; Thompson, Michael A.; Abonour, Rafat; Chari, Ajai; Cook, Gordon; Costello, Caitlin L.; Davies, Faith E.; Hungria, Vania T. M.; Lee, Hans C.; Leleu, Xavier; Puig, Noemi; Rifkin, Robert M.; Terpos, Evangelos; Usmani, Saad Z.; Weisel, Katja C.; Zonder, Jeffrey A.; Bařinová, Magda; Kuhn, Matyáš; Šilar, Jiří; Čápková, Lenka; Galvez, Kenny; Lu, Jin; Elliott, Jennifer; Stull, Dawn Marie; Ren, Kaili; Maisnar, Vladimír; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from the global, observational INSIGHT MM and the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies were integrated and analyzed. Results: At data cut-off, 263 patients from 13 countries were included. Median time from diagnosis to start of IRd was 35.8 months; median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months. Overall response rate was 73%, median progression-free survival, 21.2 months and time-to-next therapy, 33.0 months. Ixazomib/lenalidomide dose reductions were required in 17%/36% of patients; 32%/30% of patients discontinued ixazomib/lenalidomide due to adverse events. Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of IRd in routine clinical practice are comparable to those reported in TOURMALINE-MM1.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Real-world comparative effectiveness of triplets containing bortezomib (B), carfilzomib (C), daratumumab (D), or ixazomib (I) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US
    (Springer, 2021) Davies, Faith; Rifkin, Robert; Costello, Caitlin; Morgan, Gareth; Usmani, Saad; Abonour, Rafat; Palumbo, Antonio; Romanus, Dorothy; Hajek, Roman; Terpos, Evangelos; Cherepanov, Dasha; Stull, Dawn Marie; Huang, Hui; Leleu, Xavier; Berdeja, Jesus; Lee, Hans C.; Weisel, Katja; Thompson, Michael; Boccadoro, Mario; Zonder, Jeffrey; Cook, Gordon; Puig, Noemi; Vela-Ojeda, Jorge; Farrelly, Eileen; Raju, Aditya; Blazer, Marlo; Chari, Ajai; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Multiple available combinations of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators (IMIDs), and monoclonal antibodies are shifting the relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treatment landscape. Lack of head-to-head trials of triplet regimens highlights the need for real-world (RW) evidence. We conducted an RW comparative effectiveness analysis of bortezomib (V), carfilzomib (K), ixazomib (I), and daratumumab (D) combined with either lenalidomide or pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd or Pd) in RRMM. A retrospective cohort of patients initiating triplet regimens in line of therapy (LOT) ≥ 2 on/after 1/1/2014 was followed between 1/2007 and 3/2018 in Optum's deidentified US electronic health records database. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; regimens were compared using covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Seven hundred forty-one patients (820 patient LOTs) with an Rd backbone (VRd, n = 349; KRd, n = 218; DRd, n = 99; IRd, n = 154) and 348 patients (392 patient LOTs) with a Pd backbone (VPd, n = 52; KPd, n = 146; DPd, n = 149; IPd, n = 45) in LOTs ≥2 were identified. More patients ≥75 years received IRd (39.6%), IPd (37.8%), and VRd (36.7%) than other triplets. More patients receiving VRd/VPd were in LOT2 vs other triplets. Unadjusted median TTNT in LOT ≥ 2: VRd, 13.9; KRd, 8.7; IRd, 11.4; DRd, not estimable (NE); and VPd, 12.0; KPd, 6.7; IPd, 9.5 months; DPd, NE. In covariate-adjusted analysis, only KRd vs DRd was associated with a significantly higher risk of next LOT initiation/death (HR 1.72; P = 0.0142); no Pd triplet was significantly different vs DPd in LOT ≥ 2. Our data highlight important efficacy/effectiveness gaps between results observed in phase 3 clinical trials and those realized in the RW.