- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Irritable bowel syndrome"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome(Wiley, 2015-08) Self, Mariella M.; Williams, Amy E.; Czyzewski, Danita I.; Weidler, Erica M.; Shulman, Robert J.; Department of Psychiatry, IU School of MedicineBACKGROUND: In functional gastrointestinal disorders, patient recall of symptoms drives diagnostic decisions and evaluation of treatment response, and research conclusions about potential treatments. In pediatrics, parent report also impacts assessment and care. Hence, identifying methods for accurately capturing patient and parent report of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms is important. This study evaluated correspondence between retrospective questionnaire (parent and child report) and prospective diary data for children and adolescents with IBS. METHODS: Participants included 50 children/adolescents with IBS per Rome III criteria. Children completed a 2-week pain and stool diary. Children and parents subsequently completed a 2-week recall questionnaire, reporting number of pain days, maximum pain, days without bowel movement, and days with diarrhea during the diary interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement. KEY RESULTS: For pain and days without bowel movement, overall agreement between child recall questionnaire and child diary was strong, although under conditions likely to facilitate agreement and with individual variation observed. Parent recall and child diary were less concordant, and agreement about diarrhea was poor for parent and child. Age did not significantly correlate with agreement. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Child questionnaire with short recall interval may be a reasonable approximation for diary data, although this varies by individual and replication/investigation of lengthier recall are needed. Relying on parent questionnaire does not appear a suitable proxy, and recall of stool form by both parent and child appears more problematic. These results combined with existing literature support use of diary data whenever possible.Item Associations of Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acids With Colonic Transit, Fecal Bile Acid, and Food Intake in Irritable Bowel Syndrome(Wolters Kluwer, 2023-01-01) Waseem, Mohammed Ray; Shin, Andrea; Siwiec, Robert; James-Stevenson, Toyia; Bohm, Matthew; Rogers, Nicholas; Wo, John; Waseem, Lina; Gupta, Anita; Jarrett, Megan; Kadariya, Jhalka; Xu, Huiping; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction: Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) correlate with colonic transit time (CTT) and may influence irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathophysiology. However, the clinical significance of fecal SCFAs, relationships between SCFAs and other metabolites (bile acids [BAs]), and real-time diet effects on SCFAs in IBS are uncertain. The aim was to evaluate fecal SCFA associations with IBS phenotype and mechanisms and explore effects of real-time diet. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of fecal SCFA, BAs, and CTT in healthy controls (HCs) and participants with IBS. We compared study end points across groups, analyzed relationships between end points, and evaluated the discriminative ability of SCFAs. Diet effects were explored in participants with dietary data. Results: Among 21 HCs and 43 participants with IBS, fecal SCFAs (total, individual) were inversely correlated with overall (all P < 0.01) and segmental (all P < 0.05) CTT; similar associations were observed within HC and IBS groups. The acetate-to-butyrate ratio correlated with slower overall and left CTT in all and in HCs (both P < 0.01). SCFAs (total, acetate) correlated with BAs (total, % primary) in all participants and in those with IBS with diarrhea. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated associations of acetate with slower transit (odds ratio = 0.988, P = 0.002) and BA diarrhea (BAD; odds ratio = 1.014, P = 0.001). Acetate accurately predicted delayed CTT (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve = 0.84) and BAD (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.79). Adjusting for diet strengthened correlations of total SCFAs with overall CTT ( R = [-0.46], P = 0.04) and SCFAs with transverse CTT (all P < 0.05). Discussion: Fecal SCFAs correlate with CTT and fecal BAs and reliably exclude delayed CTT and BAD. Accounting for diet strengthens SCFA associations with transit.Item Early Adverse Life Events and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Patients with Constipation and Suspected Disordered Defecation(Wiley, 2022) Hendrix, Justin; Ranginani, Dheeksha; Montero, Anne Mary; Lockett, Carolyn; Xu, Huiping; James-Stevenson, Toyia; Shin, Andrea; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Early adverse life events (EALs) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Disordered defecation (DD) presents with symptoms of IBS or functional constipation (FC) and is associated with psychological distress. However, the role of trauma and stress in chronic constipation is poorly defined. We aimed to examine EALS, PTSD, and psychological symptoms in patients with constipation and suspected DD. Methods: We conducted a survey study among adults with constipation who completed anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion testing (BET). Data were collected on socio-demographics, EALs, PTSD, bowel symptoms, quality of life, and anxiety and depression. We performed comparisons between individuals with normal versus abnormal ARM or BET, subgroup analysis by detailed ARM and BET findings, and latent class analysis using individual EAL domains. Key results: Among 712 eligible patients, 69 completed the study. EALs and provisional PTSD were present in 75.4% and 27.5%, respectively; rates did not differ between those with normal versus abnormal ARM or BET. Normal testing was associated with higher rates of specific EAL domains (emotional abuse and mental illness), higher depression scores, and poorer mental component scores in both primary and subgroup comparisons (all p < 0.05). Normal testing was associated with a lower likelihood of high-EAL latent class (p = 0.01) membership. Presence of IBS or FC did not influence associations. Conclusions & inferences: Early adverse life events and PTSD are prevalent in patients with constipation and suspected DD. Those with normal ARM and BET have higher rates of prior emotional abuse and poorer mental health.Item Fecal bile acids, fecal short-chain fatty acids, and the intestinal microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and control volunteers(Cambridge University Press, 2018-06) Shin, Andrea; Nelson, David; Wo, John; Camilleri, Michael; James-Stevenson, Toyia; Siwiec, Robert; Bohm, Matthew; Gupta, Anita; Medicine, School of MedicineOBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objectives and goals of this study will be to: (1) compare fecal microbiota and fecal organic acids in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and controls and (2) investigate the association between colonic transit and fecal microbiota in IBS patients and controls. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We propose an investigation of fecal organic acids, colonic transit and fecal microbiota in 36 IBS patients and 18 healthy controls. The target population will be adults ages 18–65 years meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS (both diarrhea- and constipation-predominant, IBS-D and IBS-C) and asymptomatic controls. Exclusion criteria are: (a) history of microscopic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, visceral cancer, chronic infectious disease, immunodeficiency, uncontrolled thyroid disease, liver disease, or elevated AST/ALT>2.0× the upper limit of normal, (b) prior radiation therapy of the abdomen or abdominal surgeries with the exception of appendectomy or cholecystectomy >6 months before study initiation, (c) ingestion of prescription, over the counter, or herbal medications affecting gastrointestinal transit or study interpretation within 6 months of study initiation for controls or within 2 days before study initiation for IBS patients, (d) pregnant females, (e) antibiotic usage within 3 months before study participation, (f) prebiotic or probiotic usage within the 2 weeks before study initiation, (g) tobacco users. Primary outcomes will be fecal bile acid excretion and profile, short-chain fatty acid excretion and profile, colonic transit, and fecal microbiota. Secondary outcomes will be stool characteristics based on responses to validated bowel diaries. Stool samples will be collected from participants during the last 2 days of a 4-day 100 g fat diet and split into 3 samples for fecal microbiota, SCFA, and bile acid analysis and frozen. Frozen aliquots will be shipped to the Metabolite Profiling Facility at Purdue University and the Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology for SCFA and bile acid measurements, respectively. Analysis of fecal microbiota will be performed in the research laboratory of Dr David Nelson in collaboration with bioinformatics expertise affiliated with the Nelson lab. Colonic transit time will be measured with the previously validated method using radio-opaque markers. Generalized linear models will be used as the analysis framework for comparing study endpoints among groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: This study seeks to examine the innovative concept that specific microbial signatures are associated with increased fecal excretion of organic acids to provide unique insights on a potential mechanistic link between altered intraluminal organic acids and fecal microbiota. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Results may lead to development of targets for novel therapies and diagnostic biomarkers for IBS, emphasizing the role of the fecal metabolome.Item Gut microbiota was modulated by moxibustion stimulation in rats with irritable bowel syndrome(Biomed Central, 2018-12-18) Wang, Xiaomei; Qi, Qin; Wang, Yuanyuan; Wu, Huangan; Jin, Xiaoming; Yao, Huan; Jin, Duiyin; Liu, Yanan; Wang, Cun; Anatomy and Cell Biology, IU School of MedicineBackground: The pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is closely related to intestinal dysbacteriosis and can be controlled by moxibustion treatment. However, the mechanism underlying the therapeutic value of moxibustion in IBS treatment remains unknown. Methods: An IBS rat model was established by colorectal distention (CRD) stimulus and mustard oil clyster. Sixty-five male rats were randomly divided into six groups: normal, IBS model, moxibustion, electroacupuncture (EA), Bifid-triple Viable Capsule (BTVC) and Pinaverium Bromide (PB) groups. The moxibustion group was treated with mild moxibustion at the bilateral Tianshu (ST25) and Shangjuxu (ST37) for 10 min/day for 7 days, the EA group was given EA at ST25 and ST37 once daily for 7 days, while the BTVC group and PB groups received Bifid-triple Viable Capsule and Pinaverium Bromide solution (at the proportion of 1:0.018) respectively by gavage once daily for 7 days. After the treatment, abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) scores were determined based on CRD stimulus, gut microbiota profiling was conducted by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. Results: Irritable bowel syndrome model rats had significantly increased AWR scores at all intensities (20, 40, 60 and 80 mmHg) compared with the normal group. Moxibustion treatment significantly reduced AWR scores compared with the IBS model group at all intensities. Across all groups the most abundant phyla were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes followed by Proteobacteria and Candidatus Saccharibacteria. At genus level IBS model rats had a higher abundance of Prevotella, Bacteroides and Clostridium XI and a lower abundance of Lactobacillus and Clostridium XIVa compared with normal rats. These changes in microbiota profiles could however be reversed by moxibustion treatment. Alpha diversity was decreased in IBS model rats compared with normal rats, yet significantly increased in moxibustion- and PB-treated rats compared with IBS rats. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that moxibustion treats IBS by modulating the gut microbiota.Item Refers to: Paul Enck. Not more, but less studies are warranted—If you take your meta-analysis seriously(Wiley, 2019-01) Shin, Andrea S.; Imperiale, Thomas F.; Medicine, School of MedicineThis submission is in reply to a letter by Dr. Paul Enck regarding our recent conclusions regarding the clinical efficacy of patented probiotic, VSL#3, in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Item Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy of patented probiotic, VSL#3, in irritable bowel syndrome(Wiley, 2018-12) Connell, Mary; Shin, Andrea; James-Stevenson, Toyia; Xu, Huiping; Imperiale, Thomas F.; Herron, Jennifer; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: VSL#3 is a patented probiotic for which several clinical trials suggest benefits on motor function, bloating and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Objectives: To quantify effects of VSL#3 on abdominal pain, stool consistency, overall response, abdominal bloating, and quality of life (QOL) in IBS through meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE (OvidSP and PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to May 2017. Using a fixed effects model, we pooled data from intention-to-treat analyses of randomized trials (RCTs) comparing VSL#3 to placebo in IBS. Data were reported as relative risk (RR), overall mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Quality of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Key Results: Among 236 citations, five RCTs (243 patients) were included. No significant differences were observed for abdominal pain (SMD = −0.03; 95% CI −0.29–0.22), bloating (SMD = −0.15; 95% CI −0.40–0.11), proportion of bowel movements with normal consistency (overall MD = 0; 95% CI −0.09–0.08), or IBS-QOL (SMD = 0.08; 95% CI −0.22–0.39). VSL#3 was associated with a nearly statistically significant increase in overall response (RR=1.39; 95% CI 0.99–1.98). Conclusions & Inferences: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, there was a trend towards improvement in overall response with VSL#3, but no clear evidence effectiveness for IBS. However, the number and sample sizes of the trials are small and the overall quality of evidence for three of the five outcomes was low. Larger trials evaluating validated endpoints in well-defined IBS patients are warranted.