Browsing by Subject "Information dissemination"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A common language for Gulf War Illness (GWI) research studies: GWI common data elements
    (Elsevier, 2022) Cohen, Devra E.; Sullivan, Kimberly A.; McNeil, Rebecca B.; Gulf War Illness Common Data Elements Working Group; Symptoms Assessment Working Group; McNeil, Rebecca B.; Ashford, Wes; Bested, Alison; Bunker, James; Cheema, Amanpreet; Cohen, Devra E.; Cook, Dane; Cournoyer, Jeffrey; Craddock, Travis; Golier, Julia; Hardie, Anthony; Helmer, Drew; Lindheimer, Jacob B.; Janulewicz Lloyd, Patricia; Kerr, Kathleen; Krengel, Maxine; Nadkarni, Shree; Nugent, Shannon; Paris, Bonnie; Reinhard, Matthew; Rumm, Peter; Schneiderman, Aaron; Sims, Kellie J.; Steele, Lea; Turner, Marsha; Systems Assessment Working Group; Sullivan, Kimberly A.; Abdullah, Laila; Abreu, Maria; Abu-Donia, Mohamed; Aenlle, Kristina; Arocho, Jimmy; Balbin, Elizabeth; Baraniuk, James; Block, Karen; Block, Michelle; DeBeer, Bryann; Engdahl, Brian; Filipov, Nikolay; Fletcher, Mary Ann; Kalasinsky, Victor; Kokkotou, Efi; Lidie, Kristy; Little, Deborah; Loging, William; Morris, Marianna; Nathanson, Lubov; Nichols, Montra Denise; Pasinetti, Giulio; Shungu, Dikoma; Waziry, Paula; VanLeeuwen, Jon; Younger, Jarred; Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine
    Aims: The Gulf War Illness programs (GWI) of the United States Department of Veteran Affairs and the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program collaborated with experts to develop Common Data Elements (CDEs) to standardize and systematically collect, analyze, and share data across the (GWI) research community. Main methods: A collective working group of GWI advocates, Veterans, clinicians, and researchers convened to provide consensus on instruments, case report forms, and guidelines for GWI research. A similar initiative, supported by the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) was completed for a comparative illness, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), and provided the foundation for this undertaking. The GWI working group divided into two sub-groups (symptoms and systems assessment). Both groups reviewed the applicability of instruments and forms recommended by the NINDS ME/CFS CDE to GWI research within specific domains and selected assessments of deployment exposures. The GWI CDE recommendations were finalized in March 2018 after soliciting public comments. Key findings: GWI CDE recommendations are organized in 12 domains that include instruments, case report forms, and guidelines. Recommendations were categorized as core (essential), supplemental-highly recommended (essential for specified conditions, study types, or designs), supplemental (commonly collected, but not required), and exploratory (reasonable to use, but require further validation). Recommendations will continually be updated as GWI research progresses. Significance: The GWI CDEs reflect the consensus recommendations of GWI research community stakeholders and will allow studies to standardize data collection, enhance data quality, and facilitate data sharing.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increasing Readiness for Early Integrated Palliative Oncology Care: Development and Initial Evaluation of the EMPOWER 2 Intervention
    (Elsevier, 2021) Perry, Laura M.; Sartor, Oliver; Malhotra, Sonia; Alonzi, Sarah; Kim, Seowoo; Voss, Hallie M.; Rogers, James L.; Robinson, William; Harris, Kendra; Shank, Jessica; Morrison, David G.; Lewson, Ashley B.; Fuloria, Jyotsna; Miele, Lucio; Lewis, Brian; Mossman, Brenna; Hoerger, Michael; Psychology, School of Science
    Context: Early integrated palliative care improves quality of life, but palliative care programs are underutilized. Psychoeducational interventions explaining palliative care may increase patients' readiness for palliative care. Objectives: To 1) collaborate with stakeholders to develop the EMPOWER 2 intervention explaining palliative care, 2) examine acceptability, 3) evaluate feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Methods: The research was conducted at a North American cancer center and involved 21 stakeholders and 10 patient-participants. Investigators and stakeholders iteratively developed the intervention. Stakeholders rated acceptability of the final intervention. Investigators implemented a pre-post trial to examine the feasibility of recruiting 10 patients with metastatic cancer within one month and with a ≥50% consent rate. Preliminary efficacy outcomes were changes in palliative care knowledge and attitudes. Results: Using feedback from four stakeholder meetings, we developed a multimedia intervention tailored to three levels of health-literacy. The intervention provides knowledge and reassurance about the purpose and nature of palliative care, addressing cognitive and emotional barriers to utilization. Stakeholders rated the intervention and design process highly acceptable (3.78/4.00). The pilot met a priori feasibility criteria (10 patients enrolled in 14 days; 83.3% consent rate). The intervention increased palliative care knowledge by 83.1% and improved attitudes by 18.9 points on a 0 to 51 scale (Ps < 0.00001). Conclusions: This formative research outlines the development of a psychoeducational intervention about palliative care. The intervention is acceptable, feasible, and demonstrated promising pilot test results. This study will guide clinical teams in improving patients' readiness for palliative care and inform the forthcoming EMPOWER 3 randomized clinical trial.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Metrics Toolkit: an online evidence-based resource for navigating the research metrics landscape
    (Medical Library Association, 2018-10) Champieux, Robin; Coates, Heather L.; Konkiel, Stacy; Gutzman, Karen; University Library
    While research metrics may seem well established in the scholarly landscape, it can be challenging to understand how they should be used and how they are calculated. The Metrics Toolkit is an online evidence-based resource for researchers, librarians, evaluators, and administrators in their work to demonstrate or assess the impact of research.