Browsing by Subject "Impact of Covid-19"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Framework for Developing Antiracist Medical Educators and Practitioner–Scholars
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2021-08-31) Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Poll-Hunter, Norma; Trice, Traci; Buenconsejo-Lum, Lee; Golden, Sherita; Howell, Joy; Jacobs, Nicole; Lee, Winona; Mason, Hyacinth; Ogunyemi, Dotun; Crespo, Waleska; Lamba, Sangeeta; Medicine, School of Medicine
    With an increasing awareness of the disparate impact of COVID-19 on historically marginalized populations and acts of violence on Black communities in 2020, academic health centers across the United States have been prioritizing antiracism strategies. Often, medical students and residents have been educated in the concepts of equity and antiracism and are ready to tackle these issues in practice. However, faculty are not prepared to respond to or integrate antiracism topics into the curriculum. Leaders in faculty affairs, education, diversity, and other departments are seeking tools, frameworks, expertise, and programs that are best suited to meet this imminent faculty development need. In response to these demands for guidance, the authors came together to explore best practices, common competencies, and frameworks related to antiracism education. The focus of their work was preparing faculty to foster antiracist learning environments at traditionally predominantly-White medical schools. In this Scholarly Perspective, the authors describe their collaborative work to define racism and antiracism education; propose a framework for antiracism education for faculty development; and outline key elements to successfully build faculty capacity in providing antiracism education. The proposed framework highlights the interplay between individual learning and growth and the systemic and institutional changes needed to advance antiracist policies and practices. The key elements of the framework include building foundational awareness, expanding foundational knowledge on antiracism, embedding antiracism education into practice, and dismantling oppressive structures and measuring progress. The authors list considerations for program planning and provide examples of current work from their institutions. The proposed strategies aim to support all faculty and enable them to learn, work, and educate others in an antiracist learning environment.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of COVID-19 on gastroenterology fellowship training: a multicenter analysis of endoscopy volumes
    (Thieme, 2021-09-16) Paleti, Swathi; Sobani, Zain A.; McCarty, Thomas R.; Gutta, Aditya; Gremida, Anas; Shah, Raj; Nutalapati, Venkat; Bazerbachi, Fateh; Jesudoss, Randhir; Amin, Shreya; Okwara, Chinemerem; Kathi, Pradeep Reddy; Ahmed, Ali; Gessel, Luke; Hung, Kenneth; Masoud, Amir; Yu, Jessica; Mony, Shruti; Akshintala, Venkata; Jamil, Laith; Nasereddin, Thayer; Kochhar, Gursimran; Vyas, Neil; Saligram, Shreyas; Garg, Rajat; Sandhu, Dalbir; Benrajab, Karim; Konjeti, Rajesh; Agnihotri, Abhishek; Trivedi, Hirsh; Grunwald, Matthew; Mayer, Ira; Mohanty, Arpan; Rustagi, Tarun; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Abstract Background and study aims The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on gastroenterology training programs. We aimed to objectively evaluate procedural training volume and impact of COVID-19 on gastroenterology fellowship programs in the United States. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Procedure volume data on upper and lower endoscopies performed by gastroenterology fellows was abstracted directly from the electronic medical record. The study period was stratified into 2 time periods: Study Period 1, SP1 (03/15/2020 to 06/30/2020) and Study Period 2, SP2 (07/01/2020 to 12/15/2020). Procedure volumes during SP1 and SP2 were compared to Historic Period 1 (HP1) (03/15/2019 to 06/30/2019) and Historic Period 2 (HP2) (07/01/2019 to 12/15/2019) as historical reference. Results Data from 23 gastroenterology fellowship programs (total procedures = 127,958) with a median of 284 fellows (range 273–289; representing 17.8 % of all trainees in the United States) were collected. Compared to HP1, fellows performed 53.6 % less procedures in SP1 (total volume: 28,808 vs 13,378; mean 105.52 ± 71.94 vs 47.61 ± 41.43 per fellow; P < 0.0001). This reduction was significant across all three training years and for both lower and upper endoscopies (P < 0.0001). However, the reduction in volume was more pronounced for lower endoscopy compared to upper endoscopy [59.03 % (95 % CI: 58.2–59.86) vs 48.75 % (95 % CI: 47.96–49.54); P < 0.0001]. The procedure volume in SP2 returned to near baseline of HP2 (total volume: 42,497 vs 43,275; mean 147.05 ± 96.36 vs 150.78 ± 99.67; P = 0.65). Conclusions Although there was a significant reduction in fellows’ endoscopy volume in the initial stages of the pandemic, adaptive mechanisms have resulted in a return of procedure volume to near baseline without ongoing impact on endoscopy training.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on U.S. orthodontic practices in 2020
    (Elsevier, 2021-10-04) Motevasel, Hengameh; Helms, Lana R.; Eckert, George J.; Stewart, Kelton T.; Albright, David A.; Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, School of Dentistry
    INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the immediate impact and long-term implications of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus on orthodontic practices in the United States in 2020. METHODS: A 35-item survey was developed and validated to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on the orthodontic specialty. The survey contained 5 domains, including respondent's demographic information, COVID-19 information acquisition, practice ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic, financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, and patient management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. This voluntary survey acquired responses from active orthodontists in the United States. Associations of demographic and practice characteristics with items related to COVID-19 were assessed using chi-square tests, with a 5% significance level. RESULTS: The survey was disseminated to 5,694 orthodontists, and 507 complete surveys were obtained (response rate of 8.9%). Respondents indicated that they obtained the most useful information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic through professional associations and internet or online news resources. However, 30% of the orthodontists believed information regarding personal financial guidelines was lacking. Most respondents identified delayed treatment progress and temporary staff layoffs as the 2 most negative ramifications of mandated office closures. Approximately 93% of practices applied for and used some sort of stimulus funding offered through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Respondents indicated that the COVID-19 related office closures resulted in an average of 50% decrease in net revenue. CONCLUSIONS: The survey found that the COVID-19 pandemic had a broad and significant impact on patient care and financial aspects of U.S. orthodontic practices in 2020. Although generally accepting of the federal and state recommendations, respondents appeared to desire more guidance during the early phase of the pandemic.