Browsing by Subject "Hip"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Baseball and softball pitchers are distinct within-subject controlled models for exploring proximal femur adaptation to physical activity
    (Springer, 2019-01-21) Fuchs, Robyn K.; Thompson, William R.; Weatherholt, Alyssa M.; Warden, Stuart J.; Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences
    Purpose: Within-subject controlled models in individuals who preferentially load one side of the body enable efficient exploration of the skeletal benefits of physical activity. There is no established model of physical activity-induced side-to-side differences (i.e., asymmetry) at the proximal femur. Methods: Proximal femur asymmetry was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in male jumping athletes (JMP, n=16), male baseball pitchers (BB, n=21), female fast-pitch softball pitchers (SB, n=22), and controls (CON, n=42). The jumping leg was the dominant leg in JMP, whereas in BB, SB and CON the dominant leg was contralateral to the dominant/throwing arm. Results: BB and SB had 5.5% (95%CI, 3.9 to 7.0%) and 6.5% (95%CI, 4.8 to 8.2%) dominant-to-nondominant leg differences for total hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD), with the asymmetry being greater than both CON and JMP (p<0.05). BB and SB also possessed dominant-to-nondominant leg differences in femoral neck and trochanteric aBMD (p<0.001). SB had 9.7% (95% CI, 6.4 to 13.0%) dominant-to-nondominant leg differences in femoral neck bone mineral content, which was larger than any other group (p≤0.006). At the narrow neck, SB had large (>8%) dominant-to-nondominant leg differences in cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia and section modulus, which were larger than any other group (p≤0.02). Conclusion: Male baseball and female softball pitchers are distinct within-subject controlled models for exploring adaptation of the proximal femur to physical activity. They exhibit adaptation in their dominant/landing leg (i.e., leg contralateral to the throwing arm), but the pattern differs with softball pitchers exhibiting greater femoral neck adaptation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Doctor when can I drive? A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to driving after total hip arthroplasty
    (Sage, 2023) Patel, Purva V.; Giannoudis, Vasileios P.; Palma, Samantha; Guy, Stephen P.; Palan, Jeya; Pandit, Hemant; Van Duren, Bernard H.; Graduate Medical Education, School of Medicine
    Background/objective: Advice given to patients on driving resumption after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is inconsistent. Due to a lack of clear guidelines, surgeons' recommendations range between 4-8 weeks after surgery to resume driving. Delays in driving return can have detrimental social and economic impact. However, it is important to ensure patients only resume driving once safe. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of driving simulation studies after THA to establish when patients can safely return to driving postoperatively. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion, data was extracted, and studies assessed for bias risk. Review Manager, was used for statistical analysis. Values for brake reaction time (BRT) were included for meta-analysis. Results: 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 7 measured BRT and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled means of both right and left THA showed BRT around or above preoperative baseline at 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks, and below baseline at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 32 weeks and 52 weeks. Of these, the pooled means at 6, 32, and 52 weeks were significant (p < 0.05).Studies not meeting meta-analysis inclusion criteria were included in a qualitative analysis, examining self-reported postoperative driving return times which ranged from 6 days to over a year or in rare cases, never. Majority of patients (n = 960) self-reported driving return within approximately 6 weeks (pooling of mean values 32.9 days). Conclusions: The mean return to driving time recommended in the literature was 4.5 weeks. Based upon BRT meta-analysis, a return to baseline braking performance was noted at 6 weeks postoperatively. However, driving is a complex skill, and patient recommendation should be individualised based on factors such as vehicle transmission type, THA technique, surgical side, medication and comorbidities.