Browsing by Subject "Healthcare resource utilization"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of perioperative hypotension with subsequent greater healthcare resource utilization
    (Elsevier, 2021) Stapelfeldt, Wolf H.; Khanna, Ashish K.; Shaw, Andrew D.; Shenoy, Apeksha V.; Hwang, Seungyoung; Stevens, Mitali; Smischney, Nathan J.; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Study objective: Determine if perioperative hypotension, a modifiable risk factor, is associated with increased postoperative healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Multicenter using the Optum® electronic health record database. Patients: Patients discharged to the ward after non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgeries between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017 with six months of data, before and after the surgical visit. Interventions/exposure: Perioperative hypotension, a binary variable (presence/absence) at an absolute MAP of ≤65-mmHg, measured during surgery and within 48-h after, to dichotomize patients with greater versus lesser hypotensive exposures. Measurements: Short-term HRU defined by postoperative length-of-stay (LOS), discharge to a care facility, and 30-day readmission following surgery discharge. Mid-term HRU (within 6 months post-discharge) quantified via number of outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits, and readmission LOS. Main results: 42,800 distinct patients met study criteria and 37.5% experienced perioperative hypotension. After adjusting for study covariates including patient demographics and comorbidities, patients with perioperative hypotension had: longer LOS (4.01 vs. 3.83 days; LOS ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), higher odds of discharge to a care facility (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24; observed rate 22.1% vs. 18.1%) and of 30-day readmission (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33; observed rate 6.2% vs. 5.0%) as compared to the non-hypotensive population (all outcomes, p < 0.001). During 6-month follow-up, patients with perioperative hypotension showed significantly greater HRU regarding number of ED visits (0.34 vs. 0.31 visits; visit ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and readmission LOS (1.06 vs. 0.92 days; LOS ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24) but not outpatient visits (10.47 vs. 10.82; visit ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99) compared to those without hypotension. There was no difference in HRU during the 6-month period before qualifying surgery. Conclusions: We report a significant association of perioperative hypotension with an increase in HRU, including additional LOS and readmissions, both important contributors to overall medical costs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Healthcare Resource Use and Costs Among Individuals with Vitiligo and Psychosocial Comorbidities: Retrospective Analysis of an Insured US Population
    (Dove Press, 2024-08-08) Lofland, Jennifer H.; Darbha, Samyuktha; Naim, Ahmad B.; Rosmarin, David; Dermatology, School of Medicine
    Purpose: This study aimed to describe healthcare resource utilization and costs among individuals with vitiligo who were diagnosed with ≥1 psychosocial comorbidity, using data from US claims databases. Patients and methods: A retrospective, observational cohort analysis of the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases for US individuals with vitiligo aged ≥12 years and a first vitiligo claim between January 1 and December 31, 2018, was undertaken to assess psychosocial burden, including mental and behavioral health comorbidities. Results: Of the 12,427 individuals included in the analysis, nearly 1 in 4 (23.5%) who had vitiligo were also diagnosed with ≥1 psychosocial comorbidity. A greater percentage of these individuals versus those who were not diagnosed with a psychosocial comorbidity had a vitiligo-related prescription claim (50.2% vs 45.4%; P<0.0001), especially for oral corticosteroids (25.4% vs 16.6%; P<0.0001) and low-potency topical corticosteroids (9.0% vs 7.6%; P<0.05). Total vitiligo-related healthcare resource utilization and costs were consistent among individuals with and without psychosocial comorbidity despite significantly (P<0.05) higher vitiligo-related ER visit utilization and expenditure among those with psychosocial comorbidity. Furthermore, individuals diagnosed with vitiligo and ≥1 psychosocial comorbidity had significantly (P<0.0001) greater utilization of all-cause mean prescription claims (25.0 vs 12.8), outpatient services (other than physician and ER visits: 19.5 vs 11.3), outpatient physician visits (10.1 vs 6.4), inpatient stays (0.6 vs 0.1), and ER visits (0.4 vs 0.2) and incurred significantly higher mean (SD) direct medical expenditures ($18,804 [$46,621] vs $9833 [$29,094] per patient per year; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Individuals with vitiligo who were diagnosed with ≥1 psychosocial comorbidity incurred greater total all-cause but not vitiligo-related healthcare resource utilization and expenditures than those without diagnosis of psychosocial comorbidities. Identification of psychosocial comorbidities in individuals with vitiligo may be important for multidisciplinary management of vitiligo to reduce overall burden for individuals with vitiligo.