Browsing by Subject "Health equity"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 35
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item 196 Measuring the Impact of Community Engagement Brokers through Qualitative Interviews(Cambridge University Press, 2023-04-24) Piechowski, Patricia; Claxton, Gina; Spencer, Nicola 'Nicki'; Vasile, Elizabeth; Zender, Robynn; Medicine, School of MedicineOBJECTIVES/GOALS: As the clinical and translational research enterprise evolves toward addressing health equity and the science of translational science, the CE Brokers are exploring new avenues for impacting the CTSA consortium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Since 2013, managers of Community Engagement (CE) programs across the NCATS CTSA institutes have met monthly to build connections, share knowledge, and advocate for the boundary spanner role. As the clinical and translational research enterprise evolves toward addressing health equity and the science of translational science, the CE Brokers are exploring new avenues for impacting the CTSA consortium. The CE Brokers are composed of 140 individuals from 58 CTSA-associated institutions, and have a long history that has fostered rich, trusting relationships. The growth and strength of this group has primed it to pivot with the new NCATS direction to contribute meaningfully to the science of community engagement and continue the work of improving health equity within the communities we serve. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2022; we surveyed its members about their roles and responsibilities; the ways the network has contributed to their hub’s adoption and development of best practices and innovations; resources and lessons learned; the creation of opportunities for members to collaboratively conduct and disseminate original research; and research on the science of CE. Grounding ourselves in this initial data, we have developed interview questions to take the inquiry further, by gathering qualitative data on the impact of the group: How the Brokers group impacted them personally and professionally; How the Brokers impacted the work of their CTSA; In three words, describe the group; How could the CE Brokers contribute to the science of community engagement? DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Together, we will identify themes supported by quotes to inform how the CE Broker group is most effectively moving the CTSAs’ mission forward and how it can be improved. These will be shared at the Translational Science Meeting, 2023.Item 2023 Inaugural Healthcare Delivery Science: Innovation and Partnerships for Health Equity Research (DESCIPHER) Symposium(Wiley, 2024-07-04) Orechwa, Allison Z.; Abhat, Anshu; Amezcua, Lilyana; Boden-Albala, Bernadette; Buchanan, Thomas A.; Chen, Steve; Daskivich, Lauren P.; Feldman, Brett; Gould, Michael K.; Lee, Wei-an; Lynch, Christopher; Meltzer, Carolyn C.; Mittman, Brian S.; Pereyda, Margarita; Raff, Evan; Robinson, Jehni; Saluja, Sonali; Turner, Barbara J.; Taira, Breena R.; Trotzky-Sirr, Rebecca; Williams, Linda; Wu, Shinyi; Yee, Hal, Jr.; Towfighi, Amytis; Neurology, School of MedicineIntroduction: This article provides an overview of presentations and discussions from the inaugural Healthcare Delivery Science: Innovation and Partnerships for Health Equity Research (DESCIPHER) Symposium. Methods: The symposium brought together esteemed experts from various disciplines to explore models for translating evidence-based interventions into practice. Results: The symposium highlighted the importance of disruptive innovation in healthcare, the need for multi-stakeholder engagement, and the significance of family and community involvement in healthcare interventions. Conclusions: The article concluded with a call to action for advancing healthcare delivery science to achieve health equity.Item 56656 Programmatic Enhancements to Advance Racial Equity in Indiana (IN) CTSI(Cambridge University Press, 2021) Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Robb, Sheri; Hurley, Thomas; Carroll, Aaron; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineABSTRACT IMPACT: We present new programs aimed at training, retaining and preparing a diverse cadre of scientists to lead the field in transforming population health and advancing health equity. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To mitigate biases inherent to the R01 grant funding process, trainees from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (URM) may benefit from enhanced mentorship and a longer ‘runway’ to funding. As such, we have deployed two synergistic programs that aim to support URM retention and advancement. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The URM Program for Advising in Research and Development (UPwARD) pairs URM trainees with 2 mentors: 1) an institutional leader from outside their discipline to serve as an internal advocate and 2) an external eminent scholar who will facilitate the scholar’s development and prominence within their discipline. Additionally, the KL2 Program to Launch URM Success (KL2 PLUS) offers URM trainees a third year of funding to focus on scholarship, grant writing and leadership development. Four specific training components of KL2 PLUS include: 1) PLUS II Seminar Series, 2) Faculty Success Program, 3) attendance at the AAMC Minority Faculty Leadership Conference, and 4) CTSI Committee Service. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Along with measures of productivity (papers, grants, K to R transition), we will utilize social network analyses and measures of collaboration, retention, and future CTSI engagement to evaluate the programs “success’‘ as both are designed to enhance trainee scholarly development and expand their professional and social networks. UPwARD does so by supporting engagement with external mentors at professional meetings and travel to present work across institutions. PLUS writing accountability groups will enhance publication rates and grant submissions, while also building connections with other URM faculty. Trainees also serve on IN CTSI committees to groom talent for future IN CTSI leadership. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Systemic inequities underlie the ‘leaky pipeline’ challenge we face in cultivating a diverse cadre of senior scientists and independent investigators. With intentional programming and targeted investments, IN CTSI aims to advance more equitable funding outcomes and diverse leadership.Item A Global Health Reciprocal Innovation grant programme: 5-year review with lessons learnt(BMJ Publishing, 2023) Ruhl, Laura J.; Kiplagat, Jepchirchir; O'Brien, Rishika; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Scanlon, Michael; Plater, David; Thomas, Melissa R.; Pastakia, Sonak; Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi; Morales-Soto, Nydia; Nyandiko, Winstone; Vreeman, Rachel C.; Litzelman, Debra K.; Laktabai, Jeremiah; Medicine, School of MedicineUnilateral approaches to global health innovations can be transformed into cocreative, uniquely collaborative relationships between low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HIC), constituted as 'reciprocal innovation' (RI). Since 2018, the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) and Indiana University (IU) Center for Global Health Equity have led a grants programme sculpted from the core elements of RI, a concept informed by a 30-year partnership started between IU (Indiana) and Moi University (Kenya), which leverages knowledge sharing, transformational learning and translational innovations to address shared health challenges. In this paper, we describe the evolution and implementation of an RI grants programme, as well as the challenges faced. We aim to share the successes of our RI engagement and encourage further funding opportunities to promote innovations grounded in the RI core elements. From the complex series of challenges encountered, three major lessons have been learnt: dedicating extensive time and resources to bring different settings together; establishing local linkages across investigators; and addressing longstanding inequities in global health research. We describe our efforts to address these challenges through educational materials and an online library of resources for RI projects. Using perspectives from RI investigators funded by this programme, we offer future directions resulting from our 5-year experience in applying this RI-focused approach. As the understanding and implementation of RI grow, global health investigators can share resources, knowledge and innovations that have the potential to significantly change the face of collaborative international research and address long-standing health inequities across diverse settings.Item A Systematic Approach to Developing Virtual Patient Vignettes for Pediatric Health Equity Research(Mary Ann Liebert, 2022-11-22) Mulchan, Siddika S.; Miller, Megan; Theriault, Christopher B.; Zempsky, William T.; Hirsh, Adam; Psychology, School of ScienceObjective: The aim of this study was to describe a systematic approach to developing virtual patient (VP) vignettes for health equity research in pediatric pain care. Methods: VPs were initially developed to depict the body posture and movements of actual children experiencing pain. Researchers and clinicians with expertise in pediatric pain worked closely with a professional animator to portray empirically supported pain expression in four, full-motion, virtual male characters of two races (i.e., White and Black). Through an iterative process, VPs were refined to (1) appear realistic in a clinical setting and (2) display archetypal pain behavior and expression during a 1-min video clip without sound. Text vignettes were developed with consultation from experts in pain care and presented alongside VPs to assess clinical decision-making. VP vignettes were piloted in a sample of pediatric providers (N=13). Results: Informed by the literature and expertise of stakeholders, several revisions were made to improve VPs' facial grimacing and realism before piloting. VPs appeared to accurately capture important aspects of pain expression and behavior common among pediatric patients with pain disorders. Additional refinements to the text vignettes were made based on provider feedback to improve clarity and clinical relevance. Conclusions: This article presents a working framework to facilitate a systematic approach to developing VP vignettes. This framework is a first step toward advancing health equity research by isolating psychosocial and interpersonal factors affecting provider behavior and decision-making. Future research is needed to validate the use of VP vignettes for assessing provider behavior contributing to health inequities for youth with pain disorders.Item Addressing Inequities in Cardiovascular Disease and Maternal Health in Black Women(American Heart Association, 2021) Cortés, Yamnia I.; Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Association between clinician team segregation, receipt of cardiovascular care and outcomes in valvular heart diseases(Wiley, 2025) Bolakale-Rufai, Ikeoluwapo Kendra; Knapp, Shannon M.; Bisono, Janina Quintero; Johnson, Adedoyin; Moore, Wanda; Yankah, Ekow; Yee, Ryan; Trabue, Dalancee; Nallamothu, Brahmajee; Hollingsworth, John M.; Watty, Stephen; Williamson, Francesca; Pool, Natalie; Hebdon, Megan; Ezema, Nneamaka; Capers, Quinn; Blount, Courtland; Kimbrough, Nia; Johnson, Denee; Evans, Jalynn; Foree, Brandi; Holman, Anastacia; Lightbourne, Karen; Brown, David; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of MedicineAims: Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease (VHD). It is unknown whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities. Among an adequately insured population, we evaluated the relationship between clinician segregation in a hospital and receipt of care by a cardiologist according to patient race. We also evaluated the association between clinician segregation, race and care by a cardiologist on 30-day readmission and 1-year survival. Methods and results: Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM, US commercial and Medicare beneficiaries) from 2010 to 2018, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of VHD. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium and high segregation groups (SG), according to clinician segregation index (SI). SI can range from 0-1 (0: the ratio of Black to White patients is the same for all clinicians; 1: each clinician treats only Black or only White patients). Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed effect models. Among 8649 patients [median age 75 (67-82), 45.4% female, 16.1% Black, 83.9% White], odds of care from a cardiologist did not vary across race for all SGs [Low SG adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.08), P = 0.14; Medium SG aOR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25), P = 0.43; High SG aOR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.69), P = 0.76]. Among those that received care from a cardiologist, there was no difference in the 30-day readmission between Black and White patients across SGs [Low SG aOR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), P = 0.70; Medium SG aOR: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.92-1.61), P = 0.17; High SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57-1.17), P = 0.27]. Among patients that did not receive care from a cardiologist, Black patients in low SG had higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients [aOR: 2.74 (95%CI:1.38-5.43), P < 0.01]. Odds of 1-year survival were similar across race for all SG irrespective of receipt of care from a cardiologist [seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.86-1.48), P = 0.38; Medium SG aOR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59-1.17), P = 0.29; High SG aOR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.66-1.52), P = 0.98; not seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.34), P = 0.19; Medium SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.28-2.37), P = 0.70; High SG aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.23-1.74), P = 0.37]. Conclusions: Among an insured population, race was not associated with care by a cardiologist for VHD or survival. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had higher odds of 30-day readmission in low clinician SG.Item Association Between the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion and Receipt of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Race and Ethnicity(American Heart Association, 2022) Mwansa, Hunter; Barry, Ibrahim; Knapp, Shannon M.; Mazimba, Sula; Calhoun, Elizabeth; Sweitzer, Nancy K.; Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than White patients. Medicaid expansion has been associated with increased access to cardiovascular care among racial and ethnic groups with higher prevalence of underinsurance. It is unknown whether the Medicaid expansion was associated with increased receipt of CRT by race and ethnicity. Methods and Results: Using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Data State Inpatient Databases from 19 states and Washington, DC, we analyzed 1061 patients from early‐adopter states (Medicaid expansion by January 2014) and 745 patients from nonadopter states (no implementation 2013–2014). Estimates of change in census‐adjusted rates of CRT with or without defibrillator by race and ethnicity and Medicaid adopter status 1 year before and after January 2014 were conducted using a quasi‐Poisson regression model. Following the Medicaid expansion, the rate of CRT did not significantly change among Black individuals from early‐adopter states (1.07 [95% CI, 0.78–1.48]) or nonadopter states (0.79 [95% CI, 0.57–1.09]). There were no significant changes in rates of CRT among Hispanic individuals from early‐adopter states (0.99 [95% CI, 0.70–1.38]) or nonadopter states (1.01 [95% CI, 0.65–1.57]). There was a 34% increase in CRT rates among White individuals from early‐adopter states (1.34 [95% CI, 1.05–1.70]), and no significant change among White individuals from nonadopter states (0.77 [95% CI, 0.59–1.02]). The change in CRT rates among White individuals was associated with the timing of the Medicaid implementation (P=0.003). Conclusions: Among states participating in Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Data State Inpatient Databases, implementation of Medicaid expansion was associated with increase in CRT rates among White individuals residing in states that adopted the Medicaid expansion policy. Further work is needed to address disparities in CRT among Black and Hispanic patients.Item Baseline Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to Transplantation in Medicare’s ESRD Treatment Choices Payment Model(Elsevier, 2023-12-15) Drewry, Kelsey M.; Mora, Ariana N.; Kim, Daeho; Koukounas, Kalli; Wilk, Adam S.; Trivedi, Amal N.; Patzer, Rachel E.; Surgery, School of MedicineItem Better together: Coalitions committed to advancing health equity(Elsevier, 2022-11) Crowder, Sharron J.; Tanner, Andrea L.; Dawson, Martha A.; Felsman, Irene C.; Hassmiller , Susan B.; Miller, Lisa C.; Reinhard, Susan C.; Toney, Debra A.; School of NursingThe Future of Nursing 2020–2030 report identifies coalitions as a driving force for advancing health equity. Five coalitions provided insight into their accomplishments, lessons learned, and role in advancing health equity. The exemplar coalitions included Latinx Advocacy Team and Interdisciplinary Network for COVID-19, Black Coalition Against COVID, Camden Coalition, National Coalition of Ethnic Minority Nurse Associations, and The Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action. While all exemplar coalitions, credited relationship building and partnerships to their success, they used unique strategies for striving to meet their populations’ needs, whether the needs arose from COVID-19, racial and/or ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, or other barriers to health. Research and policy implications for coalitions are discussed. Nurses play a critical role in every highlighted coalition and in the national effort to make health and health care more equitable.