Browsing by Subject "Health care disparities"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Catalyzing Restructure of a Broken Healthcare System
    (American Heart Association, 2024) Breathett, Khadijah; Manning, Kimberly D.; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Geographic Disparities in Case Fatality and Discharge Disposition Among Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    (American Heart Association, 2023) Bako, Abdulaziz T.; Potter, Thomas; Pan, Alan; Tannous, Jonika; Rahman, Omar; Langefeld, Carl; Woo, Daniel; Britz, Gavin; Vahidy, Farhaan S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: We evaluate nationwide trends and urban–rural disparities in case fatality (in‐hospital mortality) and discharge dispositions among patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods and Results: In this repeated cross‐sectional study, we identified adult patients (≥18 years of age) with primary ICH from the National Inpatient Sample (2004–2018). Using a series of survey design Poisson regression models, with hospital location–time interaction, we report the adjusted risk ratio (aRR), 95% CI, and average marginal effect (AME) for factors associated with ICH case fatality and discharge dispositions. We performed a stratified analysis of each model among patients with extreme loss of function and minor to major loss of function. We identified 908 557 primary ICH hospitalizations (overall mean age [SD], 69.0 [15.0] years; 445 301 [49.0%] women; 49 884 [5.5%] rural ICH hospitalizations). The crude ICH case fatality rate was 25.3% (urban hospitals: 24.9%, rural hospitals:32.5%). Urban (versus rural) hospital patients had a lower likelihood of ICH case fatality (aRR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83–0.89]). ICH case fatality is declining over time; however, it is declining faster in urban hospitals (AME, −0.049 [95% CI, −0.051 to −0.047]) compared with rural hospitals (AME, −0.034 [95% CI, −0.040 to −0.027]). Conversely, home discharge is increasing significantly among urban hospitals (AME, 0.011 [95% CI, 0.008–0.014]) but not significantly changing in rural hospitals (AME, −0.001 [95% CI, −0.010 to 0.007]). Among patients with extreme loss of function, hospital location was not significantly associated with ICH case fatality or home discharge. Conclusions: Improving access to neurocritical care resources, particularly in resource‐limited communities, may reduce the ICH outcomes disparity gap.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pilot test of a Multi-Component Implementation Strategy for Equity in Advanced Heart Failure Allocation
    (Elsevier, 2023) Breathett, Khadijah; Yee, Ryan H.; Pool, Natalie; Hebdon, Megan C.; Knapp, Shannon M.; Calhoun, Elizabeth; Sweitzer, Nancy K.; Carnes, Molly; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Advanced heart failure (AHF) therapy allocation is vulnerable to bias related to subjective assessments and poor group dynamics. Our objective was to determine whether an implementation strategy for AHF team members could feasibly contribute to organizational and culture change supporting equity in AHF allocation. Using a pretest-posttest design, the strategy included an 8-week multicomponent training on bias reduction, standardized numerical social assessments, and enhanced group dynamics at an AHF center. Evaluations of organizational and cultural changes included pretest-posttest AHF team member surveys, transcripts of AHF meetings to assess group dynamics using a standardized scoring system, and posttest interviews guided by a framework for implementing a complex strategy. Results were analyzed with qualitative descriptive methods and Brunner-Munzel tests for relative effect (RE, RE >0.5 signals posttest improvement). The majority of survey metrics revealed potential benefit with RE >0.5. REs were >0.5 for 5 of 6 group dynamics metrics. Themes for implementation included (1) promoting equitable distribution of scarce resources, (2) requiring a change in team members' time investment to correct bias and change the meeting structure, (3) slowing and then accelerating the allocation process, and (4) adaptable beyond AHF and reinforceable with semi-annual trainings. An implementation strategy for AHF equity demonstrated the feasibility for organizational and culture changes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Proactive, Recovery-Oriented Treatment Navigation to Engage Racially Diverse Veterans in Mental Healthcare (PARTNER-MH), a Peer-Led Patient Navigation Intervention for Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Veterans in Veterans Health Administration Mental Health Services: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study
    (JMIR, 2022-09-06) Eliacin, Johanne; Burgess, Diana J.; Rollins, Angela L.; Patterson, Scott; Damush, Teresa; Bair, Matthew J.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Spoont, Michele; Slaven, James E.; O'Connor, Caitlin; Walker, Kiara; Zou, Denise S.; Austin, Emily; Akins, John; Miller, James; Chinman, Matthew; Matthias, Marianne S.; Psychology, School of Science
    Background: Mental health care disparities are persistent and have increased in recent years. Compared with their White counterparts, members of racially and ethnically minoritized groups have less access to mental health care. Minoritized groups also have lower engagement in mental health treatment and are more likely to experience ineffective patient-provider communication, which contribute to negative mental health care experiences and poor mental health outcomes. Interventions that embrace recovery-oriented practices to support patient engagement and empower patients to participate in their mental health care and treatment decisions may help reduce mental health care disparities. Designed to achieve this goal, the Proactive, Recovery-Oriented Treatment Navigation to Engage Racially Diverse Veterans in Mental Healthcare (PARTNER-MH) is a peer-led patient navigation intervention that aims to engage minoritized patients in mental health treatment, support them to play a greater role in their care, and facilitate their participation in shared treatment decision-making. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of PARTNER-MH delivered to patients over 6 months. The second aim is to evaluate the preliminary effects of PARTNER-MH on patient activation, patient engagement, and shared decision-making. The third aim is to examine patient-perceived barriers to and facilitators of engagement in PARTNER-MH as well as contextual factors that may inhibit or promote the integration, sustainability, and scalability of PARTNER-MH using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Methods: This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of PARTNER-MH in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) mental health setting using a mixed methods, randomized controlled trial study design. PARTNER-MH is tested under real-world conditions using certified VHA peer specialists (peers) selected through usual VHA hiring practices and assigned to the mental health service line. Peers provide PARTNER-MH and usual peer support services. The study compares the impact of PARTNER-MH versus a wait-list control group on patient activation, patient engagement, and shared decision-making as well as other patient-level outcomes. PARTNER-MH also examines organizational factors that could impact its future implementation in VHA settings. Results: Participants (N=50) were Veterans who were mostly male (n=31, 62%) and self-identified as non-Hispanic (n=44, 88%) and Black (n=35, 70%) with a median age of 45 to 54 years. Most had at least some college education, and 32% (16/50) had completed ≥4 years of college. Randomization produced comparable groups in terms of characteristics and outcome measures at baseline, except for sex. Conclusions: Rather than simply documenting health disparities among vulnerable populations, PARTNER-MH offers opportunities to evaluate a tailored, culturally sensitive, system-based intervention to improve patient engagement and patient-provider communication in mental health care for racially and ethnically minoritized individuals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rural-urban disparities in tobacco use and the role of pharmacists in closing the gap
    (Wiley, 2022) Ellis Hilts, Katy; Suchanek Hudmon, Karen; Benson, Adam F.; Elkhadragy, Nervana; School of Nursing
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    U.S. Heart Transplantation Allocation: Injustice in Complacency
    (Elsevier, 2023) Breathett, Khadijah; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Veterans Affairs Providers' Beliefs About the Contributors to and Responsibility for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Health Care Disparities
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2019-08-23) Eliacin, Johanne; Cunningham, Brooke; Partin, Melissa R.; Gravely, Amy; Taylor, Brent C.; Gordon, Howard S.; Saha, Somnath; Burgess, Diana J.; Psychology, School of Science
    Purpose: Providers' beliefs about the causes of disparities and the entities responsible for addressing these disparities are important in designing disparity-reduction interventions aimed at providers. This secondary analysis of a larger study is aimed at evaluating perceptions of providers regarding the underlying causes of racial health care disparities and their views of who is responsible for reducing them. Methods: We surveyed 232 providers at 3 Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. Results: Sixty-nine percent of participants believed that minority patients in the United States receive lower quality health care. Most participants (64%) attributed differences in quality of care for minority patients in the VA health care system primarily to patients' socioeconomic status, followed by patient behavior (43%) and provider behaviors (33%). In contrast, most participants believed that the VA and other health care organizations (75%) and providers (70%) bear the responsibility for reducing disparities, while less than half (45%) believed that patients were responsible. Among provider-level contributors to disparities, providers' poor communication was the most widely endorsed (48%), while differences in prescribing of medications (13%) and in provision of specialty referrals (12%) were the least endorsed. Conclusions: Although most providers in the study did not believe that providers contribute to disparities, they do believe that they, along with health care organizations, have the responsibility to help reduce them. Interventions might focus on directly offering providers concrete ways that they can help reduce disparities, rather than focusing on simply raising awareness about disparities and their contributions to them.