Browsing by Subject "Health care delivery"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Insurance, chronic health conditions, and utilization of primary and specialty outpatient services: a Childhood Cancer Survivor Study report
    (Springer, 2018-10) Mueller, Emily L.; Park, Elyse R.; Kirchhoff, Anne C.; Kuhlthau, Karen; Nathan, Paul C.; Perez, Giselle; Rabin, Julia; Hutchinson, Raymond; Oeffinger, Kevin C.; Robison, Leslie L.; Armstrong, Gregory T.; Leisenring, Wendy M.; Donelan, Karen; Medicine, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: Survivors of childhood cancer require life-long outpatient healthcare, which may be impacted by health insurance. This study sought to understand survivors' utilization of outpatient healthcare provider services. METHODS: The study examined cross-sectional survey data using an age-stratified sample from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study of self-reported annual use of outpatient services. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with utilization of services. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-eight survivors were surveyed, median age 36.3 years (range 22.2-62.6), median time from diagnosis 28.8 years (range 23.1-41.7). Almost all (93%) of survivors had at least one outpatient visit during the previous year; 81.3% of these visits were with a primary care providers (PCP), 54.5% were with specialty care physicians, 30.3% were with nurse practitioner/physician's assistants (NP/PA), and 14.2% were with survivorship clinic providers. Survivors with severe to life-threatening chronic health conditions had greater odds of utilizing a specialty care physician (OR = 5.15, 95% CI 2.89-9.17) or a survivorship clinic (OR = 2.93, 95% CI 1.18-7.26) than those with no chronic health conditions. Having health insurance increased the likelihood of seeking care from NP/PA (private, OR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.37-5.58; public, OR = 2.09, 95% CI 0.85-5.11), PCP (private, OR = 7.82, 95% CI 3.80-13.10; public, OR = 7.24, 95% CI 2.75-19.05), and specialty care (private, OR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.48-5.94; public, OR = 2.93, 95% CI 1.26-6.84) compared to without insurance. CONCLUSION: Most childhood cancer survivors received outpatient care from a PCP, but a minority received care from a survivorship clinic provider. Having health insurance increased the likelihood of outpatient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Targeted interventions in the primary care setting may improve risk-based, survivor-focused care for this vulnerable population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Nurse practitioner patient care patterns and practice characteristics : understanding the role of state scope-of-practice policies
    (2017-05-09) Norwood, Connor W.; Harle, Christopher; Menachemi, Nir; Stone, Cynthia; Liu, Ziyue
    Introduction: The U.S. is faced with a primary care (PC) workforce shortage; an estimated 43 percent of the population has unmet health care needs and 18.2 percent of the adult population lacks a usual source of care (USC) provider. The workforce shortage limits even those with a USC from receiving the full scope of recommended clinical services. One promising solution is reforming scope-of-practice (SOP) policies for PC nurse practitioners (NPs). Objectives: The primary objective of this dissertation was to assess the impact of NP SOP policy implementation on NP practice patterns and patient access to PC by evaluating NP time spent delivering patient care, NP role as USC providers, patient travel times, and appointment availability. Methods: The studies discussed in this dissertation leveraged cross-sectional data from the National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (NSSNP), time-series data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), and the Nurse Practitioner Professional Practice Index (NPPPI) to quantify variations in state policy environments. We used generalized mixed effects models to examine relationships in the cross-sectional data analyses and two-way fixed effect models to evaluate longitudinal data. Results: Our analyses revealed several key findings: NP SOP policies do impact the percentage of time NPs spend providing direct patient care; the NP workforce role as USC providers has increased as SOP policies have changed; states with supportive reimbursement policies have more NPs working as USC providers; and states with fewer NP supervision requirements have shorter patient travel times to USC providers. Conclusion: The U.S. health care system must continue to evolve to address the growing demand for PC services. While strategies to increase the supply of PC providers may be an effective long-term solution, our findings suggest that NP SOP reform may be a viable and complementary strategy to increasing the capacity of the PC workforce, providing more immediate relief.