- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Gram-positive bacteria"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Exploring the mechanism of action of spore photoproduct lyase(2014-08-27) Nelson, Renae; Li, Lei; Long, Eric C. (Eric Charles); McLeish, Michael J.Spore photoproduct lyase (SPL) is a radical SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) enzyme that is responsible for the repair of the DNA UV damage product 5-thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine (also called spore photoproduct, SP) in the early germination phase of bacterial endospores. SPL initiates the SP repair process using 5'-dA• (5'-deoxyadenosyl radical) generated by SAM cleavage to abstract the H6proR atom which results in a thymine allylic radical. These studies provide strong evidence that the TpT radical likely receives an H atom from an intrinsic H atom donor, C141 in B. subtilis SPL. I have shown that C141 can be alkylated in native SPL by iodoacetamide treatment indicating that it is accessible to the TpT radical. Activity studies demonstrate a 3-fold slower repair rate of SP by C141A which produces TpTSO2 - and TpT simultaneously with no lag phase observed for TpTSO2- formation. Additionally, formation of both products shows a Dvmax kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of 1.7 ± 0.2 which is smaller than the DVmax KIE of 2.8 ± 0.3 for the WT SPL reaction. Removal of the intrinsic H atom donor by this single mutation disrupts the rate-limiting process in the enzyme catalysis. Moreover, C141A exhibits ~0.4 turnover compared to the > 5 turnovers in the WT SPL reaction. In Y97 and Y99 studies, structural and biochemical data suggest that these two tyrosine residues are also crucial in enzyme catalysis. It is suggested that Y99 in B. subtilis SPL uses a novel hydrogen atom transfer pathway utilizing a pair of cysteinetyrosine residues to regenerate SAM. The second tyrosine, Y97, structurally assists in SAM binding and may also contribute to SAM regeneration by interacting with radical intermediates to lower the energy barrier for the second H-abstraction step.Item Multiplexed Signal Ion Emission Reactive Release Amplification (SIERRA) Assay for the Culture-Free Detection of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes(American Chemical Society, 2021) Pugia, Michael; Bose, Tiyash; Tjioe, Marco; Frabutt, Dylan; Baird, Zane; Cao, Zehui; Vorsilak, Anna; McLuckey, Ian; Barron, M. Regina; Barron, Monica; Denys, Gerald; Carpenter, Jessica; Das, Amitava; Kaur, Karamjeet; Roy, Sashwati; Sen, Chandan K.; Deiss, Frédérique; Chemistry and Chemical Biology, School of ScienceThe global prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has increased the risk of dangerous infections, requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. The standard method for diagnosis of bacterial infections remains dependent on slow culture-based methods, carried out in central laboratories, not easily extensible to rapid identification of organisms, and thus not optimal for timely treatments at the point-of-care (POC). Here, we demonstrate rapid detection of bacteria by combining electrochemical immunoassays (EC-IA) for pathogen identification with confirmatory quantitative mass spectral immunoassays (MS-IA) based on signal ion emission reactive release amplification (SIERRA) nanoparticles with unique mass labels. This diagnostic method uses compatible reagents for all involved assays and standard fluidics for automatic sample preparation at POC. EC-IA, based on alkaline phosphatase-conjugated pathogen-specific antibodies, quantified down to 104 bacteria per sample when testing Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lysates. EC-IA quantitation was also obtained for wound samples. The MS-IA using nanoparticles against S. aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa allowed selective quantitation of ∼105 bacteria per sample. This method preserves bacterial cells allowing extraction and amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA genes and antibiotic resistance genes, as was demonstrated through identification and quantitation of two strains of E. coli, resistant and nonresistant due to β-lactamase cefotaximase genes. Finally, the combined immunoassays were compared against culture using remnant deidentified patient urine samples. The sensitivities for these immunoassays were 83, 95, and 92% for the prediction of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli or K. pneumoniae positive culture, respectively, while specificities were 85, 92, and 97%. The diagnostic platform presented here with fluidics and combined immunoassays allows for pathogen isolation within 5 min and identification in as little as 15 min to 1 h, to help guide the decision for additional testing, optimally only on positive samples, such as multiplexed or resistance gene assays (6 h).