- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Germ-line mutation"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Differential Activity of PARP Inhibitors in BRCA1- Versus BRCA2-Altered Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021-07-22) Taza, Fadi; Holler, Albert E.; Fu, Wei; Wang, Hao; Adra, Nabil; Albany, Costantine; Ashkar, Ryan; Cheng, Heather H.; Sokolova, Alexandra O.; Agarwal, Neeraj; Kessel, Adam; Bryce, Alan; Nafissi, Nellie; Barata, Pedro; Sartor, A. Oliver; Bastos, Diogo; Smaletz, Oren; Berchuck, Jacob E.; Taplin, Mary-Ellen; Aggarwal, Rahul; Sternberg, Cora N.; Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.; Alva, Ajjai S.; Su, Christopher; Marshall, Catherine H.; Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.; Medicine, School of MedicineTwo poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) are US Food and Drug Administration-approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations, but the relative efficacy of PARP inhibition in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC is understudied. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 12 sites. We collected genomic and clinical data from 123 patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC who were treated with PARP inhibitors. The primary efficacy end point was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% PSA decline) rate. Secondary end points were PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical or radiographic PFS, and overall survival. We compared clinical outcomes, and other genomic characteristics, among BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. Results: A total of 123 patients (13 BRCA1 and 110 BRCA2) were included. PARP inhibitors used were olaparib (n = 116), rucaparib (n = 3), talazoparib (n = 2), and veliparib (n = 2). At diagnosis, 72% of patients had Gleason 8-10 disease. BRCA1 patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (69% v 37%; P = .04). Age, baseline PSA, metastatic distribution, and types of previous systemic therapies were similar between groups. There were equal proportions of germline mutations (51% v 46%; P = .78) in both groups. BRCA1 patients had more monoallelic (56% v 41%; P = .49) and concurrent TP53 (55% v 36%; P = .32) mutations. PSA50 responses in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered patients were 23% versus 63%, respectively (P = .01). BRCA2 patients achieved longer PSA-PFS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 4.09; P = .08), PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.40; P = .05), and overall survival (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.83; P = .008). Biallelic (compared with monoallelic) mutations, truncating (compared with missense) mutations, and absence of a concurrent TP53 mutation were associated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Conclusion: PARP inhibitor efficacy is diminished in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. This is not due to an imbalance in germline mutations but might be related to more monoallelic mutations and/or concurrent TP53 alterations in the BRCA1 group.Item Germline Genetic Mutations in a Multi-Center Contemporary Cohort of 550 Phyllodes Tumors: An Opportunity for Expanded Multi-Gene Panel Testing(Springer Nature, 2020) Rosenberger, Laura H.; Thomas, Samantha M.; Nimbkar, Suniti N.; Hieken, Tina J.; Ludwig, Kandice K.; Jacobs, Lisa K.; Miller, Megan E.; Gallagher, Kristalyn K.; Wong, Jasmine; Neuman, Heather B.; Tseng, Jennifer; Hassinger, Taryn E.; Jakub, James W.; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: A paucity of data exists regarding inherited mutations associated with phyllodes tumors (PT); however, some are reported (TP53, BRCA1, and RB1). A PT diagnosis does not meet NCCN criteria for testing, including within Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (TP53). We sought to determine the prevalence of mutations associated with PT. Methods: We performed an 11-institution review of contemporary (2007-2017) PT practice. We recorded multigenerational family history and personal history of genetic testing. We identified patients meeting NCCN criteria for genetic evaluation. Logistic regression estimated the association of select covariates with likelihood of undergoing genetic testing. Results: Of 550 PT patients, 59.8% (n = 329) had a close family history of cancer, and 34.0% (n = 112) had ≥ 3 family members affected. Only 6.2% (n = 34) underwent genetic testing, 38.2% (n = 13) of whom had only BRCA1/BRCA2 tested. Of 34 patients tested, 8.8% had a deleterious mutation (1 BRCA1, 2 TP53), and 5.9% had a BRCA2 VUS. Of women who had TP53 testing (N = 21), 9.5% had a mutation. Selection for testing was not associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, p = 0.55) or PT size (p = 0.12) but was associated with grade (malignant vs. benign: OR 9.17, 95% CI 3.97-21.18) and meeting NCCN criteria (OR 3.43, 95% confidence interval 1.70-6.94). Notably, an additional 86 (15.6%) patients met NCCN criteria but had no genetic testing. Conclusions: Very few women with PT undergo germline testing; however, in those selected for testing, a deleterious mutation was identified in ~ 10%. Multigene testing of a PT cohort would present an opportunity to discover the true incidence of germline mutations in PT patients.Item LFSPROShiny: an interactive R/Shiny app for prediction and visualization of cancer risks in families with deleterious germline TP53 mutations(medRxiv, 2023-08-15) Nguyen, Nam H.; Dodd-Eaton, Elissa B.; Peng, Gang; Corredor, Jessica L.; Jiao, Wenwei; Woodman-Ross, Jacynda; Arun, Banu K.; Wang, Wenyi; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicinePurpose: LFSPRO is an R library that implements risk prediction models for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a genetic disorder characterized by deleterious germline mutations in the TP53 gene. To facilitate the use of these models in clinics, we developed LFSPROShiny, an interactive R/Shiny interface of LFSPRO that allows genetic counselors (GCs) to perform risk predictions without any programming components, and further visualize the risk profiles of their patients to aid the decision-making process. Methods: LFSPROShiny implements two models that have been validated on multiple LFS patient cohorts: a competing-risk model that predicts cancer-specific risks for the first primary, and a recurrent-event model that predicts the risk of a second primary tumor. Starting with a visualization template, we keep regular contact with GCs, who ran LFSPROShiny in their counseling sessions, to collect feedback and discuss potential improvement. Upon receiving the family history as input, LFSPROShiny renders the family into a pedigree, and displays the risk estimates of the family members in a tabular format. The software offers interactive overlaid side-by-side bar charts for visualization of the patients' cancer risks relative to the general population. Results: We walk through a detailed example to illustrate how GCs can run LFSPROShiny in clinics, from data preparation to downstream analyses and interpretation of results with an emphasis on the utilities that LFSPROShiny provides to aid decision making. Conclusion: Since Dec 2021, we have applied LFSPROShiny to over 100 families from counseling sessions at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Our study suggests that software tools with easy-to-use interfaces are crucial for the dissemination of risk prediction models in clinical settings, hence serving as a guideline for future development of similar models.Item LFSPROShiny: An Interactive R/Shiny App for Prediction and Visualization of Cancer Risks in Families With Deleterious Germline TP53 Mutations(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024) Nguyen, Nam H.; Dodd-Eaton, Elissa B.; Peng, Gang; Corredor, Jessica L.; Jiao, Wenwei; Woodman-Ross, Jacynda; Arun, Banu K.; Wang, Wenyi; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicinePurpose: LFSPRO is an R library that implements risk prediction models for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a genetic disorder characterized by deleterious germline mutations in the TP53 gene. To facilitate the use of these models in clinics, we developed LFSPROShiny, an interactive R/Shiny interface of LFSPRO that allows genetic counselors (GCs) to perform risk predictions without any programming components and further visualize the risk profiles of their patients to aid the decision-making process. Methods: LFSPROShiny implements two models that have been validated on multiple LFS patient cohorts: a competing risk model that predicts cancer-specific risks for the first primary and a recurrent-event model that predicts the risk of a second primary tumor. Starting with a visualization template, we keep regular contact with GCs, who ran LFSPROShiny in their counseling sessions, to collect feedback and discuss potential improvement. On receiving the family history as input, LFSPROShiny renders the family into a pedigree and displays the risk estimates of the family members in a tabular format. The software offers interactive overlaid side-by-side bar charts for visualization of the patients' cancer risks relative to the general population. Results: We walk through a detailed example to illustrate how GCs can run LFSPROShiny in clinics from data preparation to downstream analyses and interpretation of results with an emphasis on the utilities that LFSPROShiny provides to aid decision making. Conclusion: Since December 2021, we have applied LFSPROShiny to over 100 families from counseling sessions at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Our study suggests that software tools with easy-to-use interfaces are crucial for the dissemination of risk prediction models in clinical settings, hence serving as a guideline for future development of similar models.Item Risk of Syndrome-Associated Cancers Among First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants(American Medical Association, 2023) Chen, Xuan; Meyer, Margaret A.; Kemppainen, Jennifer L.; Horibe, Masayasu; Chandra, Shruti; Majumder, Shounak; Petersen, Gloria M.; Rabe, Kari G.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineImportance: Increased cancer risk in first-degree relatives of probands with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC probands) who carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in cancer syndrome-associated genes encourages cascade genetic testing. To date, unbiased risk estimates for the development of cancers on a gene-specific basis have not been assessed. Objective: To quantify the risk of development of PDAC and extra-PDAC among first-degree relatives of PDAC probands who carry a PGV in 1 of 9 cancer syndrome-associated genes-ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and CDKN2A. Design, setting, and participants: This case series focused on first-degree relatives of PDAC probands carrying PGVs in specific cancer syndrome-associated genes. The cohort comprised clinic-ascertained patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Biospecimen Resource for Pancreas Research registry with germline genetic testing. In total, 234 PDAC probands carrying PGVs were drawn from the prospective research registry of 4562 participants who had undergone genetic testing of cancer syndrome-associated genes. Demographic and cancer-related family histories were obtained by questionnaire. The data were collected from October 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Main outcomes and measures: For the PDAC probands, the genetic test results of the presence of PGVs in 9 cancer syndrome-associated genes were obtained by clinical testing. Cancers (ovary, breast, uterus or endometrial, colon, malignant melanoma, and pancreas) among first-degree relatives were reported by the probands. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to estimate cancer risks among first-degree relatives of PDAC probands carrying a PGV. Results: In total, 1670 first-degree relatives (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [17.8] years; 853 male [51.1%]) of 234 PDAC probands (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [10.1] years; 124 male [53.0%]; 219 [94.4%] White; 225 [98.7%] non-Hispanic or non-Latino]) were included in the study. There was a significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer in female first-degree relatives of probands who had variants in BRCA1 (SIR, 9.49; 95% CI, 3.06-22.14) and BRCA2 (SIR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.36-8.11). Breast cancer risks were higher with BRCA2 variants (SIR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.89-3.54). The risks of uterine or endometrial cancer (SIR, 6.53; 95% CI, 2.81-12.86) and colon cancer (SIR, 5.83; 95% CI, 3.70-8.75) were increased in first-degree relatives of probands who carried Lynch syndrome mismatch repair variants. Risk of PDAC was also increased for variants in ATM (SIR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.69-7.16), BRCA2 (SIR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.72-6.17), CDKN2A (SIR, 7.38; 95% CI, 3.18-14.54), and PALB2 (SIR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.45-13.79). Melanoma risk was elevated for first-degree relatives of probands with CDKN2A variants (SIR, 7.47; 95% CI, 3.97-12.77). Conclusions and relevance: In this case series, the presence of PGVs in 9 cancer syndrome-associated genes in PDAC probands was found to be associated with increased risk of 6 types of cancers in first-degree relatives. These gene-specific PDAC and extra-PDAC cancer risks may provide justification for clinicians to counsel first-degree relatives about the relevance and importance of genetic cascade testing, with the goal of higher uptake of testing.Item Signaling Pathway Alterations Driven by BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutations are Sufficient to Initiate Breast Tumorigenesis by the PIK3CAH1047R Oncogene(American Association for Cancer Research, 2024) Bhat-Nakshatri, Poornima; Khatpe, Aditi S.; Chen, Duojiao; Batic, Katie; Mang, Henry; Herodotou, Christopher; McGuire, Patrick C.; Xuei, Xiaoling; Erdogan, Cihat; Gao, Hongyu; Liu, Yunlong; Sandusky, George; Storniolo, Anna Maria; Nakshatri, Harikrishna; Surgery, School of MedicineSingle-cell transcriptomics studies have begun to identify breast epithelial cell and stromal cell specific transcriptome differences between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. We generated a single-cell transcriptome atlas of breast tissues from BRCA1, BRCA2 mutation carriers and compared this single-cell atlas of mutation carriers with our previously described single-cell breast atlas of healthy non-carriers. We observed that BRCA1 but not BRCA2 mutations altered the ratio between basal (basal-myoepithelial), luminal progenitor (luminal adaptive secretory precursor, LASP), and mature luminal (luminal hormone sensing) cells in breast tissues. A unique subcluster of cells within LASP cells is underrepresented in case of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with non-carriers. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations specifically altered transcriptomes in epithelial cells which are an integral part of NFκB, LARP1, and MYC signaling. Signaling pathway alterations in epithelial cells unique to BRCA1 mutations included STAT3, BRD4, SMARCA4, HIF2A/EPAS1, and Inhibin A signaling. BRCA2 mutations were associated with upregulation of IL6, PDK1, FOXO3, and TNFSF11 signaling. These signaling pathway alterations are sufficient to alter sensitivity of BRCA1/BRCA2-mutant breast epithelial cells to transformation as epithelial cells from BRCA1 mutation carriers overexpressing hTERT + PIK3CAH1047R generated adenocarcinomas, whereas similarly modified mutant BRCA2 cells generated basal carcinomas in NSG mice. Thus, our studies provide a high-resolution transcriptome atlas of breast epithelial cells of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and reveal their susceptibility to PIK3CA mutation-driven transformation. Significance: This study provides a single-cell atlas of breast tissues of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and demonstrates that aberrant signaling due to BRCA1/2 mutations is sufficient to initiate breast cancer by mutant PIK3CA.Item Somatic mutational landscape of hereditary hematopoietic malignancies caused by germline variants in RUNX1, GATA2, and DDX41(American Society of Hematology, 2023) Homan, Claire C.; Drazer, Michael W.; Yu, Kai; Lawrence, David M.; Feng, Jinghua; Arriola-Martinez, Luis; Pozsgai, Matthew J.; McNeely, Kelsey E.; Ha, Thuong; Venugopal, Parvathy; Arts, Peer; King-Smith, Sarah L.; Cheah, Jesse; Armstrong, Mark; Wang, Paul; Bödör, Csaba; Cantor, Alan B.; Cazzola, Mario; Degelman, Erin; DiNardo, Courtney D.; Duployez, Nicolas; Favier, Remi; Fröhling, Stefan; Rio-Machin, Ana; Klco, Jeffery M.; Krämer, Alwin; Kurokawa, Mineo; Lee, Joanne; Malcovati, Luca; Morgan, Neil V.; Natsoulis, Georges; Owen, Carolyn; Patel, Keyur P.; Preudhomme, Claude; Raslova, Hana; Rienhoff, Hugh; Ripperger, Tim; Schulte, Rachael; Tawana, Kiran; Velloso, Elvira; Yan, Benedict; Kim, Erika; Sood, Raman; Hsu, Amy P.; Holland, Steven M.; Phillips, Kerry; Poplawski, Nicola K.; Babic, Milena; Wei, Andrew H.; Forsyth, Cecily; Fan, Helen Mar; Lewis, Ian D.; Cooney, Julian; Susman, Rachel; Fox, Lucy C.; Blombery, Piers; Singhal, Deepak; Hiwase, Devendra; Phipson, Belinda; Schreiber, Andreas W.; Hahn, Christopher N.; Scott, Hamish S.; Liu, Paul; Godley, Lucy A.; Brown, Anna L.; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Pediatrics, School of MedicineIndividuals with germ line variants associated with hereditary hematopoietic malignancies (HHMs) have a highly variable risk for leukemogenesis. Gaps in our understanding of premalignant states in HHMs have hampered efforts to design effective clinical surveillance programs, provide personalized preemptive treatments, and inform appropriate counseling for patients. We used the largest known comparative international cohort of germline RUNX1, GATA2, or DDX41 variant carriers without and with hematopoietic malignancies (HMs) to identify patterns of genetic drivers that are unique to each HHM syndrome before and after leukemogenesis. These patterns included striking heterogeneity in rates of early-onset clonal hematopoiesis (CH), with a high prevalence of CH in RUNX1 and GATA2 variant carriers who did not have malignancies (carriers-without HM). We observed a paucity of CH in DDX41 carriers-without HM. In RUNX1 carriers-without HM with CH, we detected variants in TET2, PHF6, and, most frequently, BCOR. These genes were recurrently mutated in RUNX1-driven malignancies, suggesting CH is a direct precursor to malignancy in RUNX1-driven HHMs. Leukemogenesis in RUNX1 and DDX41 carriers was often driven by second hits in RUNX1 and DDX41, respectively. This study may inform the development of HHM-specific clinical trials and gene-specific approaches to clinical monitoring. For example, trials investigating the potential benefits of monitoring DDX41 carriers-without HM for low-frequency second hits in DDX41 may now be beneficial. Similarly, trials monitoring carriers-without HM with RUNX1 germ line variants for the acquisition of somatic variants in BCOR, PHF6, and TET2 and second hits in RUNX1 are warranted.