- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "GeoHealth"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers(Wiley, 2022) Filippelli, Gabriel; Colwell, Rita; Anenberg, Susan; Balbus, John; Ceccarelli, Daniela; Hudson-Edwards, Karen; Jutla, Antarpreet; Miao, Chiyuan; Sandifer, Paul; Vengosh, Avner; Earth Sciences, School of Science*The editors thank the 2021 peer reviewers. *In 2021, GeoHealth benefited from 365 reviews provided by 241 of our peers. *A number of individuals submitted multiple reviews for GeoHealth in 2021.Item Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers(Wiley, 2023-05-21) Filippelli, Gabriel; Colwell, Rita R.; Anenberg, Susan; Ceccarelli, Daniela; Franklin, Meredith; Dey, Sagnik; Hudson-Edwards, Karen A.; Jutla, Antarpreet; Miao, Chiyuan; Paytan, Adina; Vengosh, Avner; Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of SciencePeer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2022, GeoHealth benefited from 333 reviews provided by 245 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society. Thank you to the 245 reviewers who submitted 333 reviews in the journal last year. Individuals in italics provided two or more reviews for GeoHealth during the year.Item We have been the ladder and held the ladder": Evolving GeoHealth models for actionable, community-engaged research(ESS Open Archive, 2022-11-24) Hayhow, Claire; Brabander, Dan J.; Jim, Rebecca; Lively, Martin; Filippelli, Gabriel; Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of ScienceGeoHealth as a research paradigm offers the opportunity to re-evaluate common research engagement models and science training practices. GeoHealth challenges are often wicked problems that require both transdisciplinary approaches and the establishment of intimate and long term partnerships with a range of community members. We examine four common modes of community engagement and explore how research projects are launched, who has the power in these relationships, and how projects evolve to become truly transformative for everyone involved.