Browsing by Subject "FGFR"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current Strategies and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    (MDPI, 2020-06-02) Mollica, Veronica; Rizzo, Alessandro; Montironi, Rodolfo; Cheng, Liang; Giunchi, Francesca; Schiavina, Riccardo; Santoni, Matteo; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Brunocilla, Eugenio; Brandi, Giovanni; Massari, Francesco; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a frequent cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Metastatic UC has been historically associated with poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of approximately 15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 18%. Although platinum-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of medical treatment for patients with metastatic UC, chemotherapy clinical trials produced modest benefit with short-lived, disappointing responses. In recent years, the better understanding of the role of immune system in cancer control has led to the development and approval of several immunotherapeutic approaches in UC therapy, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been revolutionizing the treatment of metastatic UC. Because of a better tumor molecular profiling, FGFR inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, anti-HER2 agents, and antibody drug conjugates targeting Nectin-4 are also emerging as new therapeutic options. Moreover, a wide number of trials is ongoing with the aim to evaluate several other alterations and pathways as new potential targets in metastatic UC. In this review, we will discuss the recent advances and highlight future directions of the medical treatment of UC, with a particular focus on recently published data and ongoing active and recruiting trials.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hyperphosphatemic Tumoral Calcinosis With Pemigatinib Use
    (Elsevier, 2022-07-16) Puar, Akshan; Donegan, Diane; Helft, Paul; Kuhar, Matthew; Webster, Jonathan; Rao, Megana; Econs, Michael; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background/objective: Pemigatinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor, is a novel therapeutic approach for treating cholangiocarcinoma when an FGFR fusion or gene rearrangement is identified. Although the most reported side effect of pemigatinib is hyperphosphatemia, tumoral calcinosis with soft tissue calcifications is not widely recognized as a complication. We report a case of patient with hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis on pemigatinib. Case report: A 59-year-old woman with progressive metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, despite receiving treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine for 7 months, was found to have an FGFR2-BICC1 fusion in the tumor on next-generation sequencing. Pemigatinib was, therefore, initiated. Four months into the therapy, multiple subcutaneous nodules developed over the lower portion of her back, hips, and legs. Punch biopsies revealed deep dermal and subcutaneous calcifications. Investigations revealed elevated serum phosphorus (7.5 mg/dL), normal serum calcium (8.7 mg/dL), and elevated intact fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23, 1216 pg/mL; normal value <59 pg/mL) levels. Serum phosphorus levels improved with a low-phosphorus diet and sevelamer. Calcifications regressed with pemigatinib discontinuation. Discussion: Inhibition or deficiency of FGF-23 results in hyperphosphatemia and can lead to ectopic calcification. Pemigatinib, a potent inhibitor of FGFR-1-3, blocks the effect of FGF-23 leading to hyperphosphatemia and tumoral calcinosis as observed in our case. Treatment is aimed primarily at lowering serum phosphate levels through dietary restriction or phosphate binders; however, the regression of tumoral calcinosis can occur with pemigatinib cessation, as seen in this case. Conclusion: As the use of FGFR 1-3 inhibitors becomes more prevalent, we aim to raise attention to the potential side effects of tumoral calcinosis.