Browsing by Subject "Enterobacteriaceae"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Global epidemiology, genetic environment, risk factors and therapeutic prospects of mcr genes: A current and emerging update
    (Frontiers Media, 2022-08-26) Mmatli, Masego; Mbelle, Nontombi Marylucy; Sekyere , John Osei; Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine
    Background: Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes modify Lipid A molecules of the lipopolysaccharide, changing the overall charge of the outer membrane. Results and discussion: Ten mcr genes have been described to date within eleven Enterobacteriaceae species, with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella species being the most predominant. They are present worldwide in 72 countries, with animal specimens currently having the highest incidence, due to the use of colistin in poultry for promoting growth and treating intestinal infections. The wide dissemination of mcr from food animals to meat, manure, the environment, and wastewater samples has increased the risk of transmission to humans via foodborne and vector-borne routes. The stability and spread of mcr genes were mediated by mobile genetic elements such as the IncHI2 conjugative plasmid, which is associated with multiple mcr genes and other antibiotic resistance genes. The cost of acquiring mcr is reduced by compensatory adaptation mechanisms. MCR proteins are well conserved structurally and via enzymatic action. Thus, therapeutics found effective against MCR-1 should be tested against the remaining MCR proteins. Conclusion: The dissemination of mcr genes into the clinical setting, is threatening public health by limiting therapeutics options available. Combination therapies are a promising option for managing and treating colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections whilst reducing the toxic effects of colistin.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of ETEST Eravacycline for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci
    (American Society for Microbiology, 2023) Blanchard, Laurine S.; Armstrong, Thomas P.; Kresken, Michael; Emery, Christopher L.; Ying, Yun X.; Sauvonnet, Véronique; Zambardi, Gilles; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Eravacycline (ERV) (brand name Xerava [Tetraphase]) is a new tetracycline-class antibacterial that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). ETEST is a gradient diffusion method that represents a simple alternative to the broth microdilution (BMD) method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new ETEST ERV (bioMérieux) in comparison with BMD was conducted following FDA and International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations, using FDA- and EUCAST-defined breakpoints. Clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 542) and Enterococcus spp. (n = 137) were included. Based on the BMD reference method, 92 Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 9 enterococcal isolates were nonsusceptible to ERV according to the FDA breakpoints, while 7 Escherichia coli isolates and 3 Enterococcus sp. isolates were classified as ERV resistant according the EUCAST breakpoints. Referring to FDA performance criteria, the ETEST ERV demonstrated 99.4% and 100.0% essential agreement (EA), 98.0% and 94.9% categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME) rates of 5.4% and 33.33%, and major error (ME) rates of 1.3% and 3.1% with clinical and challenge isolates, respectively, of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus spp. According to EUCAST breakpoints, E. coli and Enterococcus sp. isolate results also met ISO acceptance criteria for EA and CA (EA of 99.0% and 100.0%, respectively, and CA of 100.0% for both), without any VMEs or MEs. In conclusion, we report that ETEST ERV represents an accurate tool for performing ERV AST of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus sp. isolates.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    (American Society for Microbiology, 2018-08-27) Bailey, Adam L.; Armstrong, Tom; Dwivedi, Hari-Prakash; Denys, Gerald A.; Hindler, Janet; Campeau, Shelley; Traczewski, Maria; Humphries, Romney; Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam–beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections., Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam–beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 Enterobacteriaceae challenge isolates and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the Enterobacteriaceae, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for P. aeruginosa were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 Enterobacteriaceae, including 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 159 Escherichia coli isolates, in addition to 173 P. aeruginosa isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 98.8% for P. aeruginosa isolates. Within the Enterobacteriaceae, isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for K. pneumoniae and one for Providencia rettgeri). By BMD, 47.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 46.2% of P. aeruginosa challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 12.1% of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.