- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Enrollment"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Barriers to Screening: An Analysis of Factors Impacting Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Prevention Trials(Oxford University Press, 2023-01-11) Kinney, Mara; You, Lu; Sims, Emily K.; Wherrett, Diane; Schatz, Desmond; Lord, Sandra; Krischer, Jeffrey; Russell, William E.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Libman, Ingrid; Buckner, Jane; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Herold, Kevan C.; Steck, Andrea K.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineContext: Participants with stage 1 or 2 type 1 diabetes (T1D) qualify for prevention trials, but factors involved in screening for such trials are largely unknown. Objective: To identify factors associated with screening for T1D prevention trials. Methods: This study included TrialNet Pathway to Prevention participants who were eligible for a prevention trial: oral insulin (TN-07, TN-20), teplizumab (TN-10), abatacept (TN-18), and oral hydroxychloroquine (TN-22). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine participant, site, and study factors at the time of prevention trial accrual. Results: Screening rates for trials were: 50% for TN-07 (584 screened/1172 eligible), 9% for TN-10 (106/1249), 24% for TN-18 (313/1285), 17% for TN-20 (113/667), and 28% for TN-22 (371/1336). Younger age and male sex were associated with higher screening rates for prevention trials overall and for oral therapies. Participants with an offspring with T1D showed lower rates of screening for all trials and oral drug trials compared with participants with other first-degree relatives as probands. Site factors, including larger monitoring volume and US site vs international site, were associated with higher prevention trial screening rates. Conclusions: Clear differences exist between participants who screen for prevention trials and those who do not screen and between the research sites involved in prevention trial screening. Participant age, sex, and relationship to proband are significantly associated with prevention trial screening in addition to key site factors. Identifying these factors can facilitate strategic recruitment planning to support rapid and successful enrollment into prevention trials.Item Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial(BMC, 2022-08-12) Sivly, Angela; Gorr, Haeshik S.; Gravholt, Derek; Branda, Megan E.; Linzer, Mark; Noseworthy, Peter; Hargraves, Ian; Kunneman, Marleen; Doubeni, Chyke A.; Suzuki, Takeki; Brito, Juan P.; Jackson, Elizabeth A.; Burnett, Bruce; Wambua, Mike; Montori, Victor M.; Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Trial recruitment of Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) is key for interventions that interact with socioeconomic factors and cultural norms, preferences, and values. We report on our experience enrolling BIPOC participants into a multicenter trial of a shared decision-making intervention about anticoagulation to prevent strokes, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We enrolled patients with AF and their clinicians in 5 healthcare systems (three academic medical centers, an urban/suburban community medical center, and a safety-net inner-city medical center) located in three states (Minnesota, Alabama, and Mississippi) in the United States. Clinical encounters were randomized to usual care with or without a shared decision-making tool about anticoagulation. Analysis: We analyzed BIPOC patient enrollment by site, categorized reasons for non-enrollment, and examined how enrollment of BIPOC patients was promoted across sites. Results: Of 2247 patients assessed, 922 were enrolled of which 147 (16%) were BIPOC patients. Eligible Black participants were significantly less likely (p < .001) to enroll (102, 11%) than trial-eligible White participants (185, 15%). The enrollment rate of BIPOC patients varied by site. The inclusion and prioritization of clinical practices that care for more BIPOC patients contributed to a higher enrollment rate into the trial. Specific efforts to reach BIPOC clinic attendees and prioritize their enrollment had lower yield. Conclusions: Best practices to optimize the enrollment of BIPOC participants into trials that examined complex and culturally sensitive interventions remain to be developed. This study suggests a high yield from enrolling BIPOC patients from practices that prioritize their care.Item Geography: its place in higher education enrollment(2011-03-16) McDonald, Joseph P.; Banerjee, Aniruddha; Dwyer, Owen J.; Ward, Richard E.The fundamental principles colleges and universities use to recruit students have remained largely unchanged for decades. Traditionally, admissions professionals visit high schools and attend college fairs, while colleges and universities hold preview days and publish viewbooks all in the interest of attracting a high-quality and diverse student population. The recruiting process has been greatly improved through the application of modern technology. The analytic abilities of technologies such as geographic information systems (GISystems), which allow for the visualization and analysis of spatial data, presents previously underutilized strategies for higher education recruiting methods. In addition, the incorporation of a Hierarchical Bayesian model will effectively model influential enrollment factors, which successful students possess. Hierarchical Bayesian models use the prior distribution, and likelihood of an events occurrence to create the posterior distribution or Bayesian inference. The intelligence created by combining traditional recruiting techniques with GISystems and Hierarchical Bayesian modeling will allow admissions professionals to improve the success rate of enrollment efforts and expenditures. This paper will explore the application of Hierarchical Bayesian models and GISystems within higher education recruiting.Item Recruitment and Retention Strategies for the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms Study: From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium(Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Yazici, Cemal; Dyer, Anne-Marie; Conwell, Darwin L.; Afghani, Elham; Andersen, Dana K.; Basina, Marina; Bellin, Melena D.; Boone, Leslie R.; Casu, Anna; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Greenbaum, Carla J.; Hart, Phil A.; Jeon, Christie Y.; Lee, Peter J.; Meier, Shelby; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Raja-Khan, Nazia T.; Saeed, Zeb I.; Serrano, Jose; Yadav, Dhiraj; Fogel, Evan L.; Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium (T1DAP); Medicine, School of MedicineRecruitment and retention of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in clinical studies can be challenging. While some obstacles are similar to other clinical conditions, some are unique to AP. Identifying potential barriers early and developing targeted solutions can help optimize recruitment and retention in AP studies. Such preemptive and detailed planning can help prospective, longitudinal studies focusing on exocrine and endocrine complications of AP in accurately measuring outcomes. This manuscript highlights the challenges in recruitment and retention strategies in AP studies and reviews available resources to create opportunities to address them. We describe the multifaceted approach used by the Recruitment and Retention Committee of the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium (T1DAPC), which builds upon earlier experiences to develop a recruitment and retention plan for the DREAM (Diabetes RElated to Acute pancreatitis and its Mechanisms) study.