Browsing by Subject "Endoscopic Ultrasound"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Endoscopic Ultrasound and Related Technologies for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Disease - Research Gaps and Opportunities: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop
    (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2017) Lee, Linda S.; Andersen, Dana K.; Ashida, Reiko; Brugge, William R.; Canto, Mimi I.; Chang, Kenneth J.; Chari, Suresh T.; DeWitt, John; Hwang, Joo Ha; Khashab, Mouen A.; Kim, Kang; Levy, Michael J.; McGrath, Kevin; Park, Walter G.; Singhi, Aatur; Stevens, Tyler; Thompson, Christopher C.; Topazian, Mark D.; Wallace, Michael B.; Wani, Sachin; Waxman, Irving; Yadav, Dhiraj; Singh, Vikesh K.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    A workshop was sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to address the research gaps and opportunities in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The event occurred on July 26, 2017 in 4 sessions: (1) benign pancreatic diseases, (2) high-risk pancreatic diseases, (3) diagnostic and therapeutics, and (4) new technologies. The current state of knowledge was reviewed, with identification of numerous gaps in knowledge and research needs. Common themes included the need for large multicenter consortia of various pancreatic diseases to facilitate meaningful research of these entities; to standardize EUS features of different pancreatic disorders, the technique of sampling pancreatic lesions, and the performance of various therapeutic EUS procedures; and to identify high-risk disease early at the cellular level before macroscopic disease develops. The need for specialized tools and accessories to enable the safe and effective performance of therapeutic EUS procedures also was discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EUS-directed transgastric interventions in Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass anatomy: a multicenter experience
    (Elsevier, 2022-05) Ghandour, Bachir; Shinn, Brianna; Dawod, Qais M.; Fansa, Sima; El Chafic, Abdul Hamid; Irani, Shayan S.; Pawa, Rishi; Gutta, Aditya; Ichkhanian, Yervant; Paranandi, Bharat; Pawa, Swati; Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.; Zuchelli, Tobias; Huggett, Matthew T.; Bejjani, Michael; Sharaiha, Reem Z.; Kowalski, Thomas E.; Khashab, Mouen A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and Aims Placement of a Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) between the gastric pouch and the excluded stomach allows for EUS Guided Transgastric Interventions (EDGI) in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Although EUS guided transgastric ERCP (EDGE) outcomes have been reported, there is a paucity of data on other endoscopic interventions. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes and safety of EDGI. Methods This is a retrospective study involving 9 centers (8 USA, 1 Europe) and included patients with RYGB who underwent EDGI between 06/2015 and 09/2021. The primary outcome was the technical success of EDGI. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, length of hospital stay, and fistula follow-up and management. Results 54 EDGI procedures were performed in 47 patients (mean age 61yr, F 72%), most commonly for the evaluation of a pancreatic mass (n=16) and management of pancreatic fluid collections (n=10). A 20mm LAMS was utilized in 26 patients and a 15mm LAMS in 21, creating a gastrogastrostomy (GG) in 37 patients and jejunogastrostomy (JG) in 10. Most patients (n=30, 64%) underwent a dual-session EDGI, with a median interval of 17d between the 2 procedures. Single-session EDGI was performed in 17 patients, of whom 10 (59%) had anchoring of the LAMS. The most common interventions were diagnostic EUS (+/-FNA/B) (n=28) and EUS-guided cystgastrostomy (n=8). The mean procedural time was 97.6 ± 78.9 mins. Technical success was achieved in 52 (96%). AEs occurred in 5 (10.6%) patients, of which only 1 (2.1%) was graded as severe. Intraprocedural LAMS migration was the most common AE, occurring in 3 patients (6.4%), while delayed spontaneous LAMS migration occurred in 2 (4.3%). 4 of the 5 LAMS migration events were managed endoscopically, and one required surgical repair. LAMS anchoring was found to be protective against LAMS migration (p=0.001). The median duration of hospital stay was 2.1 ± 3.7d. Of the 17 patients who underwent objective fistula assessment endoscopically/radiologically after LAMS removal, 2 (11.7%) were found to have persistent fistulas. In one case the fistula was intentionally left open to assist with weight gain. The other fistula was successfully closed endoscopically. Conclusion EDGI is effective and safe for the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary and foregut disorders in RYGB patients. It is associated with high rates of technical success and low rates of severe AEs. LAMS migration is the most common AE with evidence that anchoring can be protective against its occurrence. Persistent fistulas may occur, but endoscopic closure seems effective.