Browsing by Subject "Early‐onset AD (EOAD)"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Alzheimer’s Disease Polygenic Risk in the LEADS Cohort
    (Wiley, 2025-01-03) Nudelman, Kelly N.; Pentchev, Julian V.; Jackson, Trever; Eloyan, Ani; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Hammers, Dustin B.; Carrillo, Maria C.; Dickerson, Bradford C.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Apostolova, Liana G.; LEADS Consortium; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Currently, it is unclear to what extent late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk variants contribute to early‐onset AD (EOAD). One method to clarify the contribution of late‐onset AD genetic risk to EOAD is to investigate the association of AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) with EOAD. We hypothesize that in the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS), EOAD participants will have greater PRS than early‐onset amyloid‐negative cognitively‐impaired participants (EOnonAD) and controls, and investigate the association of AD PRS with age of disease onset (AoO) and cognitive performance. Methods: GWAS data was generated for LEADS participants, including those with EOAD, EOnonAD, and controls, with the Illumina Global Screening Array. A PRS was calculated using the 31 SNPs and weights published previously by Desikan et al. (2017) for LEADS participants with imputed GWAS data (N = 369). Logistic regression models including age, sex, PRS, and genetic ancestry principal components were tested to identify predictors of EOAD (N = 210) vs. EOnonAD (N = 69) and controls (N = 89). ANCOVA models were used to assess group differences in PRS scores. Kaplan‐Meier regression was used to assess differences in EOAD AoO for tertile‐binned PRS groups. Within EOAD, pre‐calculated cognitive domain scores for speed and attention, working memory, episodic memory, language, and visuospatial performance were assessed for correlation with PRS. Results: The AD PRS was a predictor of EOAD (p = 0.014), with the model explaining 10.5% of variance (X2 = 40.971, p<0.001). EOAD participants had higher PRS scores (mean = 0.0012, standard deviation (SD) = 0.015) compared to EOnonAD and controls (mean = ‐0.0018, SD = 0.015) (F = 6.602, p = 0.011). Survival analysis indicated no significant differences in EOAD AoO between PRS groups (X2 = 3.396, p = 0.183). In the EOAD group, PRS was associated with cognitive scores for speed and attention (r = 0.204, p = 0.007), language (r = 0.230, p = 0.002), and visuospatial performance (r = 0.166, p = 0.037). Conclusions: In the LEADS cohort, AD PRS is a predictor for EOAD, and is associated with cognitive performance, but does not predict EOAD AoO. This suggests that while late onset AD‐associated genetic variants contribute to disease risk and processes, they do not account for a large portion of disease risk, and do not explain differences in disease AoO in the LEADS cohort.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of APOE genotype on cortical atrophy in early onset Alzheimer’s disease
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Chan, Diane; Brickhouse, Michael; Zaitsev, Alexander; Wong, Bonnie; Hammers, Dustin B.; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Eloyan, Ani; Nudelman, Kelly N.; Nemes, Sára; Carrillo, Maria C.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Dickerson, Bradford C.; Touroutoglou, Alexandra; LEADS Consortium; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: APOE‐ɛ4 is a major risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD); its effects have been examined in late‐onset AD (LOAD) but less so in early‐onset AD (EOAD). In LOAD, APOE genotype has strong effects on episodic memory and medial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy (Wolk & Dickerson, 2010). However, EOAD often presents with more cognitive impairments in executive function, language, and visuospatial abilities than memory. These differences reflect more prominent atrophy in posterior lateral temporal and inferior parietal cortex that mainly constitute the EOAD‐signature of atrophy. Based on the cognitive and neuroanatomical profile of EOAD, we hypothesized that EOAD ɛ4 carriers will have relatively more atrophy in MTL regions subserving episodic memory, whereas non carriers would express more atrophy in cortical regions of the EOAD‐signature involved in executive function, language, and visuospatial abilities including inferior parietal and posterior temporal regions. We also expected worse performance on episodic memory tests in ɛ4 carriers with EOAD. Methods: We examined the effects of APOE genotype on cortical atrophy and episodic memory of 144 ɛ4 carriers and 117 ɛ4 non‐carriers with EOAD from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS). Between‐group comparisons using independent T‐tests were made for morphometric measures of cortical atrophy in MTL and hippocampus localized in LOAD as well as in cortical regions within our newly developed EOAD‐Signature tool (Touroutoglou et al., 2023). ANCOVA with Bonferonni’s correction was used to evaluate for effects of age on significant differences between groups. Results: As predicted, ɛ4 carriers with EOAD had more atrophy in the MTL and bilateral hippocampi, whereas non‐carriers had more atrophy in regions of the EOAD‐signature including bilateral caudal temporal, parietal lobule, middle frontal gyrus, mid temporal, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, superior frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule. Post hoc vertex wise cortical maps further confirmed the specificity of the results. In addition, ɛ4 carriers had worse performance on episodic memory testing (AVLT delayed recall). These results were not explained by a difference in age between the groups. Conclusions: These results are consistent with prior work (Nemes et al. 2023) and support the hypothesis that the ɛ4 genotype modulates distinct neuroanatomic phenotypes of AD in EOAD patients.