- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Discourse Analysis"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item An Approach to Corpus-based Discourse Analysis: The Move Analysis as Example(Copyright © 2009 SAGE Publications [BREAK]The original doi for the as-published version of the article is 10.1177/1461445609341006. To access the doi, open the following DOI site in your browser and cut and paste the doi name where indicated: [LINK]http://dx.doi.org[/LINK]. [BREAK] Access to the original article may require subscription and authorized logon ID/password. IUPUI faculty/staff/students please check University Library resources before purchasing an article. Questions on finding the original article via our databases? Ask a librarian: [LINK] http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/research/askalibrarian [/LINK]., 2009-10) Upton, Thomas A. (Thomas Albin); Cohen, Mary AnnThis article presents a seven-step corpus-based approach to discourse analysis that starts with a detailed analysis of each individual text in a corpus that can then be generalized across all texts of a corpus, providing a description of typical patterns of discourse organization that hold for the entire corpus. This approach is applied specifically to a methodology that is used to analyze texts in terms of the functional/communicative structures that typically make up texts in a genre: move analysis. The resulting corpus-based approach for conducting a move analysis significantly enhances the value of this often used (and misused) methodology, while at the same time providing badly needed guidelines for a methodology that lacks them. A corpus of ‘birthmother letters’ is used to illustrate the approach.Item Dear Birthmother: A Linguistic Analysis of Letters Written to Expectant Mothers Considering Adoption(2007-07-20T19:08:40Z) Cohen, Mary Ann D.; Harrington, Susanmarie; Upton, Thomas A. (Thomas Albin); Shepherd, SusanItem Discourse Approaches to Writing Assessment(Copyright © 2002 Cambridge University Press[BREAK] Original publisher version at: [LINK]http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1394200401&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=13225&RQT=309&VName=PQD[/LINK].[BREAK]Access to the original article may require subscription and authorized logon ID/password. IUPUI faculty/staff/students please check University Library resources before purchasing an article. Questions on finding the original article via our databases? Ask a librarian: [LINK]http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/research/askalibrarian[/LINK]., 2002) Connor, Ulla, 1948-; Mbaye, AymerouAt present, mastery of English for educational and professional purposes contributes significantly to expansion of the role of English as a language of world communication. In this context, the teaching--and, consequently, the assessment--of EFL/ESL writing is receiving more attention than ever before. This chapter argues that, although this renewed interest in the evaluation of writing has resulted in advances in the field of language testing, it has by and large failed to incorporate insights gained from recent developments in text analysis. There is a considerable gap between current practices in writing assessment and criteria suggested by advances in knowledge of discourse structure. We illustrate this gap by contrasting current practices in the scoring of two major EFL/ESL writing tests with knowledge of text characteristics generated from recent developments in text analysis. The review concludes by making the case for bridging the gap and by proposing a model of writing assessment that incorporates both linguistic and discoursal features of texts.