Browsing by Subject "Direct oral anticoagulants"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Drug Interactions Affecting Oral Anticoagulant Use
    (American Heart Association, 2022) Mar, Philip L.; Gopinathannair, Rakesh; Gengler, Brooke E.; Chung, Mina K.; Perez, Arturo; Dukes, Jonathan; Ezekowitz, Michael D.; Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya; Lip, Gregory Y. H.; Miletello, Mike; Noseworthy, Peter A.; Reiffel, James; Tisdale, James E.; Olshansky, Brian; American Heart Association Electrocardiography & Arrhythmias Committee of the Council of Clinical Cardiology; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are medications commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular conditions. Both warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDI). DDI are an important cause of adverse drug reactions and exact a large toll on the healthcare system. DDI for warfarin mainly involve moderate to strong inhibitors / inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, which is responsible for the elimination of the more potent S-isomer of warfarin. However, inhibitor / inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 may also cause DDI with warfarin. Recognition of these precipitating agents along with increased frequency of monitoring when these agents are initiated or discontinued will minimize the impact of warfarin DDI. DOAC DDI are mainly affected by medications strongly affecting the permeability glycoprotein (P-gp), and to a lesser extent, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors / inducers. Dabigatran and edoxaban are affected by P-gp modulation. Strong inducers of CYP3A4 or P-gp should be avoided in all patients taking DOAC unless previously proven to be otherwise safe. Simultaneous strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors should be avoided in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Concomitant antiplatelet / anticoagulant use confers additive risk for bleeding, but their combination is unavoidable in many cases. Minimizing duration of concomitant anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy as indicated by evidence-based clinical guidelines is the best way to reduce the risk of bleeding.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulant and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
    (American Heart Association, 2022) Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan; Stebbins, Amanda; Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume; Vemulapalli, Sreekanth; Kosinski, Andrzej S.; Cheng, Alan; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Clinical evidence on the safety and effectiveness of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the trends and outcomes of using DOACs in patients with TAVR and atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results: Data from the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry was used to identify patients who underwent successful TAVR with preexisting or incident atrial fibrillation who were discharged on oral anticoagulation between January 2013 and May 2018. Patients with a mechanical valve, valve‐in‐valve procedure, or prior stroke within a year were excluded. The adjusted primary outcome was 1‐year stroke events. The adjusted secondary outcomes included bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. A total of 21 131 patients were included in the study (13 004 TAVR patients were discharged on a vitamin K antagonist and 8127 were discharged on DOACs.) The use of DOACs increased 5.5‐fold from 2013 to 2018. The 1‐year incidence of stroke was comparable between DOAC‐treated patients and vitamin K antagonist‐treated patients (2.51% versus 2.37%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.81–1.23) whereas DOAC‐treated patients had lower 1‐year incidence of any bleeding (11.9% versus 15.0%; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75–0.89), intracranial hemorrhage (0.33% versus 0.59%; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33–0.87), and death (15.8% versus 18.2%; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85–1.00). Conclusions: In patients with TAVR and atrial fibrillation, DOAC use, when compared with vitamin K antagonists, was associated with comparable stroke risk and significantly lower risks of bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death at 1 year.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Warfarin versus factor Xa inhibitors in the long-term treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis a single-center retrospective analysis
    (Elsevier, 2022-06-17) Christodoulides, Alexei; Bohnstedt, Bradley N.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Long-term anticoagulation in the treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) has revolved around the use of warfarin. The relatively recent introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), such as Factor Xa inhibitors, in treating CVSTs promises to offer numerous patient benefits. We aimed to examine the efficacy of Factor Xa inhibitors in comparison to warfarin in the long-term treatment of CVSTs. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in which 49 eligible patients having presented with a first-time CVST were identified. Long-term anticoagulation was achieved with Warfarin (n = 23) or Factor Xa Inhibitors (n = 26; Apixaban or Rivaroxaban). Outcomes of interest were improvements in patient functional status, modified Ranking Scores (mRS), and radiographic improvement/resolution in sinus thromboses. Secondary comparisons included complication rates, particularly recurring venous thrombotic events. Patient mRS scores by 7-to-18-month follow-up all fell within the extremely favorable range of 0-1 regardless of the long-term anticoagulant (P-value = 0.3591). Proportion of patients with radiographic improvement/resolution of thrombosed sinuses trended towards being higher in the Factor Xa Inhibitor group at the <12-month period, 69.2%, compared to 33.3% with Warfarin (P-value = 0.0548). By the >12-month follow-up period, Warfarin and Factor Xa inhibitor groups had similar rates of radiographic sinus improvement - 76.9% versus 71.4%, respectively (P-value = 0.6298). No statistically significant differences were documented between groups regarding complications. Factor Xa inhibitors are equally as effective as Warfarin in the long-term treatment of CVSTs, whether it be restoring patient functional status, sinus thrombus burden reduction, or minimizing bleeding complications whilst preventing recurrent venous thrombosis.