ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Diagnosis date"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Registry versus claims-based index dates for studies of cancer diagnosis in administrative data
    (Springer, 2025) Soppe, Sarah E.; Peacock Hinton, Sharon; Halula, Jamie C.; Lund, Jennifer L.; Baggett, Chris D.; Pruitt, Sandi L.; Mullins, Megan A.; Dillon, Ellis C.; Barclay, Matthew E.; Thompson, Matthew; Pettit, Nicholas; Lyratzopoulos, Georgios; Thompson, Caroline A.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Studies of healthcare encounters leading to cancer diagnosis have increased over recent years. While some studies examine healthcare utilization before the cancer registry date of diagnosis, relevant pre-diagnosis interactions are not always immediately prior to this date due to date abstraction guidelines. We evaluated agreement of a registry date with a claims-based index and examined Emergency Department (ED) involvement in cancer diagnosis as an example of possible pre-diagnostic healthcare misclassification that could arise from improper date choice. Methods: We implemented an algorithm to define a claims-based index as the date of the earliest International Classification of Diseases code for the cancer in Medicare and estimated agreement with the date of diagnosis from a North Carolina registry for patients diagnosed aged 66 or older with 16 cancer types from 2008 to 2017 (n = 92,056). We then classified whether each cancer was initially diagnosed through care originating in the ED using each date. Results: The index date was identical to the cancer registry date for 47% of patients and preceded the registry date for 28%, with extent of agreement varying by cancer- and patient-specific characteristics. Agreement in ED-involved diagnosis classification using each date varied by cancer site, with sensitivity of classifications using the registry date relative to the index having a minimum of 86% for prostate and kidney cancer. Conclusion: Studies assessing healthcare utilization proximal to cancer diagnosis should carefully consider the relevant assessment window and be aware that the use of cancer registry versus claims-based dates may impact variable classification.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University