Browsing by Subject "Diagnosis and classification"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reproducibility of Glycemic Measures Among Dysglycemic Youth and Adults in the RISE Study
    (The Endocrine Society, 2023) Tjaden, Ashley H.; Edelstein, Sharon L.; Arslanian, Silva; Barengolts, Elena; Caprio, Sonia; Cree-Green, Melanie; Lteif, Amale; Mather, Kieren J.; Savoye, Mary; Xiang, Anny H.; Kahn, Steven E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aims: Previous work found poor reproducibility for measures of glycemia in individuals at risk for dysglycemia. Differences between youth and adults have not been assessed. Using youth and adults in the Restoring Insulin Secretion Study, we tested variability and classification concordance for hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), fasting and 2-hour glucose from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs). Methods: HbA1c and glucose on repeated samples obtained ∼6 weeks apart were compared in 66 youth (mean age 14.2 years) and 354 adults (52.7 years). Changes, coefficient of variation (CV), and concordance of diagnostic categories between the 2 visits were compared. Results: Mean difference between the 2 visits in HbA1c was higher in youth than adults (P < .001), while fasting glucose was similar and 2-hour glucose was lower in youth (P = .051). CV was smallest for HbA1c compared to fasting and 2-hour glucose. For HbA1c, youth had higher CV (P < .001); whereas CV for 2-hour glucose was lower for youth (P = .041). Classification concordance by HbA1c was lower in youth (P = .004). Using OGTT or HbA1c for classification, intervisit variability produced discordant classification in 20% of youth and 28% of adults. Using both fasting glucose and HbA1c, intervisit variability reduced discordant classification to 16% of adults while not improving classification in youth. Conclusions: Poor reproducibility and lack of classification concordance highlight the limitations of one-time testing, with important implications for assessing eligibility in clinical trials. Consideration should be given to using more than a single parameter for screening and diagnosis, especially when classification category is important.