Browsing by Subject "Dental Alloys"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Comparison of Frictional Forces During Simulated Cuspid Retraction on a Continuous Edgewise Archwire
    (1982) Allai, W. Wesley; Garner, LaForrest D.; Sondhi, Anoop; Shanks, James C.; Swartz, Marjorie L.; Barton, Paul
    This investigation was designed to compare the force (grams) required to overcome a simulated cuspid retraction assembly capable of three dimensional control during the retraction process. It was hypothesized that a significant difference in the mean retraction values exists between the newer orthodontic alloys of Nitinol, Beta-Titanium, as well as Stainless Steel. One hundred eighty bracket and archwire combinations were examined as follows: Sample # Wire Cross-section Wire Material 30 .016”x.022” Stainless Steel 30 .017”x.025” ” 30 .016”x.022” Nitinol 30 .017”x.025” ” 30 .016”x.022 Beta-Titanium (TMA) 30 .017”x.025” ” A statistically significant difference was shown to exist between all six groups examined regarding the variables of wire size and wire material. The statistical analysis revealed that increasing rectangular archwire cross-sectional size from .016"x.022" to .017"x.025” rectangular wire when simulating canine retraction using an .018" slotted Lewis bracket will lead to significantly greater functional forces. The analysis of wire materials indicated that a significant difference (p=.01) exists between rectangular Beta-Titanium (TMA), Nitinol, and stainless steel during simulated cuspid retraction utilizing a narrow .018" Lewis bracket ligated with A-lastik ligatures. The least frictional force was observed with the .016"x.022" stainless steel test cells. The largest frictional force was found in the .017”'x.025" Beta-Titanium retraction specimens. Nitinol revealed force data intermediate between stainless steel and Beta-Titanium. The maximum resistance assembly developed 2.3 times the minimum frictional force observed. The mean grams of frictional force within these test cells ranged from 55.03 grams for the .016"x.022" retraction assembly to 132.68 grams for the .017"x.025" Beta-Titanium assembly. A topographical scanning electron microscope survey of the brackets and archwires utilized was included to provide qualitative insights into the quantitative results described.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Laser-treated stainless steel mini-screw implants: 3D surface roughness, bone-implant contact, and fracture resistance analysis
    (Oxford University Press, 2016-04) Kang, He-Kyong; Chu, Tien-Min; Dechow, Paul; Stewart, Kelton; Kyung, Hee-Moon; Liu, Sean Shih-Yao; Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, School of Dentistry
    BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the biomechanical properties and bone-implant intersurface response of machined and laser surface-treated stainless steel (SS) mini-screw implants (MSIs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight 1.3mm in diameter and 6mm long SS MSIs were divided into two groups. The control (machined surface) group received no surface treatment; the laser-treated group received Nd-YAG laser surface treatment. Half in each group was used for examining surface roughness (Sa and Sq), surface texture, and facture resistance. The remaining MSIs were placed in the maxilla of six skeletally mature male beagle dogs in a randomized split-mouth design. A pair with the same surface treatment was placed on the same side and immediately loaded with 200 g nickel-titanium coil springs for 8 weeks. After killing, the bone-implant contact (BIC) for each MSI was calculated using micro computed tomography. Analysis of variance model and two-sample t test were used for statistical analysis with a significance level of P <0.05. RESULTS: The mean values of Sa and Sq were significantly higher in the laser-treated group compared with the machined group (P <0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture resistance and BIC between the two groups. LIMITATION: animal study CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Laser treatment increased surface roughness without compromising fracture resistance. Despite increasing surface roughness, laser treatment did not improve BIC. Overall, it appears that medical grade SS has the potential to be substituted for titanium alloy MSIs.