Browsing by Subject "Delphi technique"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Rinella, Mary E.; Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratziu, Vlad; Francque, Sven M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Kanwal, Fasiha; Romero, Diana; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Arab, Juan Pablo; Arrese, Marco; Bataller, Ramon; Beuers, Ulrich; Boursier, Jerome; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Byrne, Christopher D.; Castro Narro, Graciela E.; Chowdhury, Abhijit; Cortez-Pinto, Helena; Cryer, Donna R.; Cusi, Kenneth; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Klein, Samuel; Eskridge, Wayne; Fan, Jiangao; Gawrieh, Samer; Guy, Cynthia D.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Kim, Seung Up; Koot, Bart G.; Korenjak, Marko; Kowdley, Kris V.; Lacaille, Florence; Loomba, Rohit; Mitchell-Thain, Robert; Morgan, Timothy R.; Powell, Elisabeth E.; Roden, Michael; Romero-Gómez, Manuel; Silva, Marcelo; Singh, Shivaram Prasad; Sookoian, Silvia C.; Spearman, C. Wendy; Tiniakos, Dina; Valenti, Luca; Vos, Miriam B.; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Xanthakos, Stavra; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Younossi, Zobair; Hobbs, Ansley; Villota-Rivas, Marcela; Newsome, Philip N.; NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group; Medicine, School of MedicineThe principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.Item A research definition and framework for acute paediatric critical illness across resource-variable settings: a modified Delphi consensus(Elsevier, 2024) Arias, Anita V.; Lintner-Rivera, Michael; Shafi, Nadeem I.; Abbas, Qalab; Abdelhafeez, Abdelhafeez H.; Ali, Muhammad; Ammar, Halaashuor; Anwar, Ali I.; Appiah, John Adabie; Attebery, Jonah E.; Diaz Villalobos, Willmer E.; Ferreira, Daiane; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Habib, Muhammad Irfan; Lee, Jan Hau; Kissoon, Niranjan; Tekleab, Atnafu M.; Molyneux, Elizabeth M.; Morrow, Brenda M.; Nadkarni, Vinay M.; Rivera, Jocelyn; Silvers, Rebecca; Steere, Mardi; Tatay, Daniel; Bhutta, Adnan T.; Kortz, Teresa B.; Agulnik, Asya; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network on behalf of the PALISI Global Health Subgroup; Pediatrics, School of MedicineThe true global burden of paediatric critical illness remains unknown. Studies on children with life-threatening conditions are hindered by the absence of a common definition for acute paediatric critical illness (DEFCRIT) that outlines components and attributes of critical illness and does not depend on local capacity to provide critical care. We present an evidence-informed consensus definition and framework for acute paediatric critical illness. DEFCRIT was developed following a scoping review of 29 studies and key concepts identified by an interdisciplinary, international core expert panel (n=24). A modified Delphi process was then done with a panel of multidisciplinary health-care global experts (n=109) until consensus was reached on eight essential attributes and 28 statements as the basis of DEFCRIT. Consensus was reached in two Delphi rounds with an expert retention rate of 89%. The final consensus definition for acute paediatric critical illness is: an infant, child, or adolescent with an illness, injury, or post-operative state that increases the risk for or results in acute physiological instability (abnormal physiological parameters or vital organ dysfunction or failure) or a clinical support requirement (such as frequent or continuous monitoring or time-sensitive interventions) to prevent further deterioration or death. The proposed definition and framework provide the conceptual clarity needed for a unified approach for global research across resource-variable settings. Future work will centre on validating DEFCRIT and determining high priority measures and guidelines for data collection and analysis that will promote its use in research.Item Consensus-Based Recommendations on Priority Activities to Address Acute Kidney Injury in Children: A Modified Delphi Consensus Statement(American Medical Association, 2022-09-01) Goldstein, Stuart L.; Akcan-Arikan, Ayse; Alobaidi, Rashid; Askenazi, David J.; Bagshaw, Sean M.; Barhight, Matthew; Barreto, Erin; Bayrakci, Benan; Bignall, Orville N. R.; Bjornstad, Erica; Brophy, Patrick D.; Chanchlani, Rahul; Charlton, Jennifer R.; Conroy, Andrea L.; Deep, Akash; Devarajan, Prasad; Dolan, Kristin; Fuhrman, Dana Y.; Gist, Katja M.; Gorga, Stephen M.; Greenberg, Jason H.; Hasson, Denise; Heydari Ulrich, Emma; Iyengar, Arpana; Jetton, Jennifer G.; Krawczeski, Catherine; Meigs, Leslie; Menon, Shina; Morgan, Jolyn; Morgan, Catherine J.; Mottes, Theresa; Neumayr, Tara M.; Ricci, Zaccaria; Selewski, David; Soranno, Danielle E.; Starr, Michelle; Stanski, Natalja L.; Sutherland, Scott M.; Symons, Jordan; Tavares, Marcelo S.; Wong Vega, Molly; Zappitelli, Michael; Ronco, Claudio; Mehta, Ravindra L.; Kellum, John; Ostermann, Marlies; Basu, Rajit K.; Pediatric ADQI Collaborative; Pediatrics, School of MedicineImportance: Increasing evidence indicates that acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs frequently in children and young adults and is associated with poor short-term and long-term outcomes. Guidance is required to focus efforts related to expansion of pediatric AKI knowledge. Objective: To develop expert-driven pediatric specific recommendations on needed AKI research, education, practice, and advocacy. Evidence review: At the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative meeting conducted in November 2021 by 47 multiprofessional international experts in general pediatrics, nephrology, and critical care, the panel focused on 6 areas: (1) epidemiology; (2) diagnostics; (3) fluid overload; (4) kidney support therapies; (5) biology, pharmacology, and nutrition; and (6) education and advocacy. An objective scientific review and distillation of literature through September 2021 was performed of (1) epidemiology, (2) risk assessment and diagnosis, (3) fluid assessment, (4) kidney support and extracorporeal therapies, (5) pathobiology, nutrition, and pharmacology, and (6) education and advocacy. Using an established modified Delphi process based on existing data, workgroups derived consensus statements with recommendations. Findings: The meeting developed 12 consensus statements and 29 research recommendations. Principal suggestions were to address gaps of knowledge by including data from varying socioeconomic groups, broadening definition of AKI phenotypes, adjudicating fluid balance by disease severity, integrating biopathology of child growth and development, and partnering with families and communities in AKI advocacy. Conclusions and relevance: Existing evidence across observational study supports further efforts to increase knowledge related to AKI in childhood. Significant gaps of knowledge may be addressed by focused efforts.Item Delphi Project on the trends in Implant Dentistry in the COVID-19 era: Perspectives from Latin America(Wiley, 2021) Alarcón, Marco Antonio; Sanz‐Sánchez, Ignacio; Shibli, Jamil Awad; Treviño Santos, Alejandro; Caram, Santiago; Lanis, Alejandro; Jiménez, Paola; Dueñas, Ricardo; Torres, Ronald; Alvarado, Jacinto; Avendaño, Adrián; Galindo, Roberto; Umanzor, Vilma; Shedden, Mónica; Invernizzi, Carlos; Yibrin, Caroll; Collins, James; León, Roberto; Contreras, Luis; Bueno, Luis; López‐Pacheco, Andrea; Málaga‐Figueroa, Lilian; Sanz, Mariano; Prosthodontics, School of DentistryAim To establish trends in Implant Dentistry in Latin America in the COVID‐19 pandemic. Material and methods A steering committee and an advisory group of experts in Implant Dentistry were selected among eighteen countries. An open‐ended questionnaire by Delphi methodology was validated including 64 questions, divided in 7 topics, concerning the various trends in dental implantology. The survey was conducted in two rounds, which provided the participants in the second round with the results of the first. The questionnaires were completed on August 2020, and the online meeting conference was held on September 2020. The final prediction was developed through consensus by a selected group of experts. Results A total of 197 experts from Latin America answered the first and second questionnaire. In the first round, the established threshold for consensus (65%) was achieved in 30 questions (46.87%). In the second round, performed on average 45 days later, this level was achieved in 47 questions (73.43%). Consensus was completely reached on the item “Diagnostic” (100%), the field with the lowest consensus was “Demand for treatment with dental implants” (37.5%). Conclusions The present study in Latin America has provided relevant and useful information on the predictions in the education and practice of Implant Dentistry in the COVID‐19 era. The consensus points toward a great confidence of clinicians in the biosecurity protocols used to minimize the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission. It is foreseen as an important change in education, with introduction of virtual reality and other simulation technologies in implant training.Item Establishing the international research priorities for pediatric emergency medicine point‐of‐care ultrasound: A modified Delphi study(Wiley, 2022) Snelling, Peter J.; Shefrin, Allan E.; Moake, Matthew M.; Bergmann, Kelly R.; Constantine, Erika; Deanehan, J. Kate; Dessie, Almaz S.; Elkhunovich, Marsha A.; Gold, Delia L.; Kornblith, Aaron E.; Lin-Martore, Margaret; Nti, Benjamin; Pade, Kathryn H.; Parri, Niccolò; Sivitz, Adam; Lam, Samuel H. F.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: The Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) Network (P2Network) was established in 2014 to provide a platform for international collaboration among experts, including multicenter research. The objective of this study was to use expert consensus to identify and prioritize PEM POCUS topics, to inform future collaborative multicenter research. Methods: Online surveys were administered in a two-stage, modified Delphi study. A steering committee of 16 PEM POCUS experts was identified within the P2Network, with representation from the United States, Canada, Italy, and Australia. We solicited the participation of international PEM POCUS experts through professional society mailing lists, research networks, social media, and "word of mouth." After each round, responses were refined by the steering committee before being reissued to participants to determine the ranking of all the research questions based on means and to identify the high-level consensus topics. The final stage was a modified Hanlon process of prioritization round (HPP), which emphasized relevance, impact, and feasibility. Results: Fifty-four eligible participants (16.6%) provided 191 items to Survey 1 (Round 1). These were refined and consolidated into 52 research questions by the steering committee. These were issued for rating in Survey 2 (Round 2), which had 45 participants. At the completion of Round 2, all questions were ranked with six research questions reaching high-level consensus. Thirty-one research questions with mean ratings above neutral were selected for the HPP round. Highly ranked topics included clinical applications of POCUS to evaluate and manage children with shock, cardiac arrest, thoracoabdominal trauma, suspected cardiac failure, atraumatic limp, and intussusception. Conclusions: This consensus study has established a research agenda to inform future international multicenter PEM POCUS trials. This study has highlighted the ongoing need for high-quality evidence for PEM POCUS applications to guide clinical practice.Item Facility-Based Indicators to Manage and Scale Up Cervical Cancer Prevention and Care Services for Women Living With HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Three-Round Online Delphi Consensus Method(Wolters Kluwer, 2024) Davidović, Maša; Asangbeh, Serra Lem; Taghavi, Katayoun; Dhokotera, Tafadzwa; Jaquet, Antoine; Musick, Beverly; Van Schalkwyk, Cari; Schwappach, David; Rohner, Eliane; Murenzi, Gad; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Anastos, Kathryn; Omenge, Orang’o Elkanah; Boni, Simon Pierre; Duda, Stephany N.; von Groote, Per; Bohlius, Julia; International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public HealthBackground: Of women with cervical cancer (CC) and HIV, 85% live in sub-Saharan Africa, where 21% of all CC cases are attributable to HIV infection. We aimed to generate internationally acceptable facility-based indicators to monitor and guide scale up of CC prevention and care services offered on-site or off-site by HIV clinics. Methods: We reviewed the literature and extracted relevant indicators, grouping them into domains along the CC control continuum. From February 2021 to March 2022, we conducted a three-round, online Delphi process to reach consensus on indicators. We invited 106 experts to participate. Through an anonymous, iterative process, participants adapted the indicators to their context (round 1), then rated them for 5 criteria on a 5-point Likert-type scale (rounds 2 and 3) and then ranked their importance (round 3). Results: We reviewed 39 policies from 21 African countries and 7 from international organizations; 72 experts from 15 sub-Saharan Africa countries or international organizations participated in our Delphi process. Response rates were 34% in round 1, 40% in round 2, and 44% in round 3. Experts reached consensus for 17 indicators in the following domains: primary prevention (human papillomavirus prevention, n = 2), secondary prevention (screening, triage, treatment of precancerous lesions, n = 11), tertiary prevention (CC diagnosis and care, n = 2), and long-term impact of the program and linkage to HIV service (n = 2). Conclusion: We recommend that HIV clinics that offer CC control services in sub-Saharan Africa implement the 17 indicators stepwise and adapt them to context to improve monitoring along the CC control cascade.Item National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome(Wolters Kluwer, 2021) Katz, Douglas I.; Bernick, Charles; Dodick, David W.; Mez, Jesse; Mariani, Megan L.; Adler, Charles H.; Alosco, Michael L.; Balcer, Laura J.; Banks, Sarah J.; Barr, William B.; Brody, David L.; Cantu, Robert C.; Dams-O’Connor, Kristen; Geda, Yonas E.; Jordan, Barry D.; McAllister, Thomas W.; Peskind, Elaine R.; Petersen, Ronald C.; Wethe, Jennifer V.; Zafonte, Ross D.; Foley, Éimear M.; Babcock, Debra J.; Koroshetz, Walter J.; Tripodis, Yorghos; McKee, Ann C.; Shenton, Martha E.; Cummings, Jeffrey L.; Reiman, Eric M.; Stern, Robert A.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjective: To develop evidence-informed, expert consensus research diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), the clinical disorder associated with neuropathologically diagnosed chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Methods: A panel of 20 expert clinician-scientists in neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, neurosurgery, and physical medicine and rehabilitation, from 11 academic institutions, participated in a modified Delphi procedure to achieve consensus, initiated at the First National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Consensus Workshop to Define the Diagnostic Criteria for TES, April, 2019. Before consensus, panelists reviewed evidence from all published cases of CTE with neuropathologic confirmation, and they examined the predictive validity data on clinical features in relation to CTE pathology from a large clinicopathologic study (n = 298). Results: Consensus was achieved in 4 rounds of the Delphi procedure. Diagnosis of TES requires (1) substantial exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) from contact sports, military service, or other causes; (2) core clinical features of cognitive impairment (in episodic memory and/or executive functioning) and/or neurobehavioral dysregulation; (3) a progressive course; and (4) that the clinical features are not fully accounted for by any other neurologic, psychiatric, or medical conditions. For those meeting criteria for TES, functional dependence is graded on 5 levels, ranging from independent to severe dementia. A provisional level of certainty for CTE pathology is determined based on specific RHI exposure thresholds, core clinical features, functional status, and additional supportive features, including delayed onset, motor signs, and psychiatric features. Conclusions: New consensus diagnostic criteria for TES were developed with a primary goal of facilitating future CTE research. These criteria will be revised as updated clinical and pathologic information and in vivo biomarkers become available.Item Online Modified-Delphi: a Potential Method for Continuous Patient Engagement Across Stages of Clinical Practice Guideline Development(Springer, 2021) Grant, Sean; Armstrong, Courtney; Khodyakov, Dmitry; Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthItem Prioritizing Needs and Outcomes for Adolescent Substance Use Treatment Planning: An Online Modified-Delphi Process(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-07-01) Grant, Sean; Pedersen, Eric R.; Hunter, Sarah B.; Khodyakov, Dmitry; Griffin, Beth Ann; Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthKey stakeholders can have differing views about which information is essential to inform placement decisions for all patients. This study examined consensus across stakeholder groups on the most important individual needs and treatment outcomes for informing decisions specifically about the level of care for an adolescent in substance use treatment. Methods: We conducted an online modified-Delphi process with treatment providers, policymakers, researchers, and parents of adolescents who have received substance use treatment. Participants rated 48 individual needs from the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs–Initial that were mapped onto the 6 dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine Criteria. In addition, participants rated 10 treatment outcomes from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Outcome Measures. We assessed consensus within stakeholder groups using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. We considered the items reaching consensus with the highest ratings across stakeholder groups as the most important individual needs and treatment outcomes. Results: We recruited 194 participants (81 providers, 54 policymakers, 32 researchers, 27 parents). Participants identified suicidality and severity of substance use disorder symptoms as the most important individual needs, and reduction in substance use as the most important treatment outcome. Conclusions: Standardized procedures for matching adolescents to levels of care for substance use treatment should at a minimum be based on assessments of suicidality and severity of substance use disorder symptoms, and consider reduction in substance use as a primary treatment outcome. These findings can progress the development of “level-of-care” decision rules specifically for adolescents.Item Recommended Elements of a Musculoskeletal Course for Fourth-Year Medical Students: A Modified Delphi Consensus(Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, 2025) Knox, Jordan; Carek, Stephen; Cheerla, Rajalakshmi; Cochella, Susan; DeCastro, Alexei; Deck, Jason W.; DeStefano, Sherilyn; Hartmark-Hill, Jennifer; Petrizzi, Michael; Sepdham, Dan; Sulapas, Irvin; Wilcox, James; Wise, Matthew W.; Wu, Velyn; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground and objectives: A recognized gap exists between primary care physicians' training in musculoskeletal (MSK) medicine and the burden of MSK complaints in primary care. Family medicine interns often lack adequate baseline MSK physical exam skills, which prompted a proposal to introduce a fourth-year preceptorship to reinforce MSK education. The aim of this study was to prioritize the most important elements to include in this new clinical rotation. Methods: We employed a three-round, modified Delphi method to derive consensus. Eleven panelists with experience and expertise in MSK training, medical education, or both generated a list of 118 elements. Each panelist then ranked each element by level of importance, and we reviewed the results. The ranking process was repeated two more times with a goal of achieving consensus. Results: Seventy-seven curricular elements (topics, skills, experiences) achieved consensus recommendation by being ranked either "fairly important" or "very important" for inclusion in the curriculum. Twenty-eight items were unanimously ranked "very important," 42 received a mix of "very important" and "fairly important" rankings, and seven received unanimous ranking of "fairly important." Three items were unanimously ranked "neither important nor unimportant." Conclusions: Longitudinal repetition of physical exam skills, reinforcement of relevant anatomy, and incorporation of specific frameworks for approaching MSK care are important components. Physical examination of the shoulder, knee, back, and hip are especially meaningful clinically.