Browsing by Subject "Delay Discounting"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    De-Mixing Decision Representations in Rodent dmPFC to Investigate Strategy Change During Delay Discounting
    (2023-05) White, Shelby M.; Lapish, Christopher; Czachowski, Cristine; Oberlin, Brandon; Seamans, Jeremy
    Several pathological disorders are characterized by maladaptive decision-making (Dalley & Robbins, 2017). Decision-making tasks, such as Delay Discounting (DD), are used to assess the behavioral manifestations of maladaptive decision-making in both clinical and preclinical settings (de Wit, Flory, Acheson, Mccloskey, & Manuck, 2007). DD measures cognitive impulsivity and broadly refers to the inability to delay gratification (Hamilton et al., 2015). How decisions are made in tasks that measure DD can be understood by assessing patterns of behavior that are observable in the sequences of choices or the statistics that accompany each choice (e.g. response latency). These measures have led to insights that suggest strategies that are used by the agent to facilitate the decision (Linsenbardt, Smoker, Janetsian-Fritz, & Lapish, 2016). The current set of analyses aims to use individual trial data to identify the neural underpinnings associated with strategy transition during DD. A greater understanding of how strategy change occurs at a neural level will be useful for developing cognitive and behavioral strategies aimed at reducing impulsive choice. The rat dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) has been implicated as an important brain region for recognizing the need to change strategy during DD (Powell & Redish, 2016). Using advanced statistical techniques, such as demixed principal component analysis (dPCA), we can then begin to understand how decision representations evolve over the decision- making process to impact behaviors such as strategy change. This study was the first known attempt at using dPCA applied to individual sessions to accurately model how decision representations evolve across individual trials. Evidence exists that representations follow a breakdown and remapping at the individual trial level (Karlsson, Tervo, & Karpova, 2012; Powell & Redish, 2016). Furthermore, these representational changes across individual trials have previously been proposed to act as a signal to change strategies (Powell & Redish, 2016). This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a ‘breakdown’ followed by a ‘remapping’ of the decision representation would act as a signal to change strategy that is observable in the behavior of the animal. To investigate the relationship between trials surrounding the breakdown and/or subsequent remapping of the decision representation and trials surrounding strategy changes, sequences of trials surrounding the breakdown and/or remapping were compared to sequences of 9 trials surrounding the strategy-change trial. Strategy types consisted of either exploiting the immediate lever (IM-Exploit), delay lever (DEL-Exploit), or exploring between the two lever options (Explore). Contrary to the hypothesis, an overall relationship between breakdown and remapping trial sequences were not associated with change-trial sequences. In partial support of the hypothesis however, at the 4-sec delay when the subjective value of the immediate reward was high, a relationship between breakdown sequence and strategy change sequence was detected for when the animal was exploiting the delay lever (e.g. DEL-Exploit strategy). This result suggests that a breakdown in decision representation may act as a signal to prompt strategy change under certain contexts. One notable finding of this study was that the decision representation was much more robust at the 4-sec delay compared to the 8-sec delay, suggesting that decisions at the 4-sec delay contain more context that differentiate the two choice options (immediate or delay). In other words, the encoding of the two choice options was more dissociable at the 4-sec delay compared to the 8-sec delay, which was quantified by measuring the average distance between the two representations (immediate and delay) on a given trial. Given that Wistar rats are equally likely to choose between the immediate and delay choice alternatives at the 8-sec delay (Linsenbardt et al., 2016), this finding provides further support for current prevalent theories of how animals use a cognitive search process to mentally imagine choice alternatives during deliberation. If context which differentiates choice options at the 8-sec delay is less dissociable, it is likely that the cognitive search process would be equally likely to find either choice option. If the choice options are equally likely to be found, it would be assumed that the choice alternatives would also be equally likely to be chosen, which is what has been observed in Wistar rats at the 8-sec delay.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increased delay discounting tracks with later ethanol seeking but not consumption
    (2014-07-31) Beckwith, Steven Wesley; Czachowski, Cristine; Grahame, Nicholas J.; Lapish, Christopher
    Assessments of delay discounting in rodent lines bidirectionally selected for home cage intake and preference of alcohol have had mixed findings. The current study sought to examine if delay discounting related differentially to alcohol seeking versus and alcohol drinking, two processes underlying alcohol intake and preference. Three strains of rats were utilized to answer this question Long Evans (LE), high alcohol drinking rats (HAD2), and alcohol preferring P rats. All strains were compared in an adjusting amount delay discounting task. Operant self-administration of alcohol was then assessed in the sipper tube model, and finally home cage drinking was assessed in a 24 hour 2 bottle choice paradigm. In the delay discounting it was found that the P rats were steeper discounters than both the LE and HAD2. In the sipper tube model, P rats displayed higher levels of seeking than both the HAD2s and the LE, but both the P rats and the HAD2s had higher intakes than the LE. During 24 hour home cage access, the P rats and the HAD2s had higher intake and preference for alcohol than the LE, but were not different from each other. These results show that increased discounting of delayed rewards tracks with appetitive processes versus consummatory factors and home cage intake of alcohol. This builds on prior findings using selected line pairs by providing an explanation for discordant results, and supports the hypotheses that increased delay discounting is an intermediate phenotype that predisposes individuals to alcohol use disorders.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Optogenetic Inhibition of the mPFC During Delay Discounting
    (2019-05) White, Shelby M.; Lapish, Christopher; Logrip, Marian; Czachowski, Cristine
    Impulsivity, or the tendency to act prematurely without foresight, has been linked to a diverse range of pathological conditions. Foresight refers to the ability to envision future rewards and events (i.e. prospectively sample) and has been associated with decreased impulsivity. One form of impulsivity is measured by the ability to delay gratification and is often studied in the framework of Delay Discounting (DD). DD provides the means to study impulsivity in a number of pathological conditions. However, whether impulsivity precedes the development of pathological states or results from the pathological state itself is not fully understood. This necessitates an understanding of neurobiological mechanisms contributing to decision making in both non-impulsive as well as impulsive populations of individuals. Animal models allow invasive techniques to be used to dissect the neurocircuitry involved in decision making. Given that the decision-making process is an ongoing process rather than an isolated event, optogenetics provide the temporal and spatial specificity necessary for evaluating brain region specific contributions to decision making in DD. In the present study, optogenetics were used to assess the contribution of the medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC), a brain region involved in ‘goal-directed’ behavior, in the planning of future choices (i.e. prospective plans) and subsequent measures of impulsivity in an adjusting amount DD procedure. Optogenetic inhibition of mPFC was conducted in Wistar rats during different epochs of a DD task in order to assess how mPFC affects planning behavior in a population of rat not considered to be highly impulsive. Although no direct effects on planning behavior (e.g. consistency) were observed, inhibiting mPFC after a trial has been initiated and directly before a choice was made (Epoch 2) was observed to increase measures of impulsivity in comparison to days where no optogenetic manipulation occurred in a delay-specific manner. This suggests that mPFC differentially contributes to decision making at different delays. A pattern of associations between choice latency, impulsivity, and consistency began to emerge for inactivation occurring in Epoch 2, suggesting that mPFC contributes to some aspect of planning choices during this epoch. Moreover, these results indicate that mPFC is involved in decision making in Wistar Rats. Understanding the direct role that mPFC plays in promoting choices of delayed rewards provides a neurobiological target for treatment aimed at reducing impulsivity in the clinical population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The role of the medial prefrontal cortex in delay discounting
    (2017) Beckwith, Steven Wesley; Czachowski, Cristine
    Increased delay discounting (DD) has been associated with and is theorized to contribute to alcoholism and substance abuse. It is also been associated with numerous other mental disorders and is believed to be a trans-disease process (i.e., a process that occurs in and contributes to multiple different pathologies). Consequently insights gained from studying DD are likely to apply to many different diseases. Studies on the neurobiological underpinnings of DD have two main interpretations. The first interpretation is that two different neurobehavioral systems exist, one favoring delayed rewards (executive system) and one favoring immediate rewards (impulsive system), and the system with the greater relative activation determines choice made by an individual. Alternatively, a single valuation system may exist. This system integrates different information about outcomes and generates a value signal that then guides decision making. Preclinical investigations have steered clear of these two different interpretations and rather focused on the role of individual structures in DD. One such structure, the rat mPFC, may generate an outcome representation of delayed rewards that is critically involved in attributing value to delayed rewards. Moreover, there is evidence indicating the rat mPFC may correspond to the primate dlPFC, an executive system structure. The current body of work set about testing the hypotheses that the mPFC is necessary for attributing value to delayed rewards and that decreasing the activity in an executive system area, and thus the executive system, shifts inter-temporal preference towards immediate rewards. To this end the rat mPFC was inactivated using an hM4Di inhibitory designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADD; experiment 1) or microinjections of tetrodotoxin (TTX; experiment 2) while animals completed an adjusting amount DD task. Activation of the hM4Di inhibitory DREADD receptor caused a decrease in DD, opposite of what was predicted. Electrophysiological recordings revealed a subpopulation of neurons actually increased their firing in response to hM4Di receptor activation, potentially explaining the unpredicted results. Microinjections of TTX to completely silence neural activity in the mPFC failed to produce a change in DD. Together both results indicate that mPFC activity is capable of manipulating but is not necessary for DD and the attribution of value to the delayed reward. Consequently, a secondary role for the rat mPFC in DD is proposed in line with single valuation system accounts of DD. Further investigations determining the primary structures responsible for sustaining delayed reward valuation and how manipulating the mPFC may be a means to decrease DD are warranted, and continued investigation that delineates the neurobiological processes of delayed reward valuation may provide valuable insight to both addiction and psychopathology.