Browsing by Subject "Critical Care"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Features of Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Children
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-07-08) Bhumbra, Samina; Malin, Stefan; Kirkpatrick, Lindsey; Khaitan, Alka; John, Chandy C.; Rowan, Courtney M.; Enane, Leslie A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: We sought to describe the presentation, course, and outcomes of hospitalized pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 patients, with detailed description of those requiring mechanical ventilation, and comparisons between critically ill and noncritical hospitalized pediatric patients. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health in Indianapolis in the early weeks of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Patients: All hospitalized pediatric patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 as of May 4, 2020, were included. Interventions: Patients received therapies including hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, tocilizumab, and convalescent serum and were managed according to an institutional algorithm based on evidence available at the time of presentation. Measurements and Main Results: Of 407 children tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 at our hospital, 24 were positive, and 19 required hospitalization. Seven (36.8%) were critically ill in ICU, and four (21%) required mechanical ventilation. Hospitalized children were predominantly male (14, 74%) and African-American or Hispanic (14, 74%), with a bimodal distribution of ages among young children less than or equal to 2 years old (8, 42%) and older adolescents ages 15–18 (6, 32%). Five of seven (71.4%) of critically ill patients were African-American (n = 3) or Hispanic (n = 2). Critical illness was associated with older age (p = 0.017), longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.036), and lower oxygen saturation on presentation (p = 0.016); with more thrombocytopenia (p = 0.015); higher C-reactive protein (p = 0.031); and lower WBC count (p = 0.039). Duration of mechanical ventilation averaged 14.1 days. One patient died. Conclusions: Severe, protracted coronavirus disease 2019 is seen in pediatric patients, including those without significant comorbidities. We observed a greater proportion of hospitalized children requiring mechanical ventilation than has been reported to date. Older children, African-American or Hispanic children, and males may be at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 requiring hospitalization. Hypoxia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated C-reactive protein may be useful markers of critical illness. Data regarding optimal management and therapies for pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 are urgently needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cross-sectional comparison of critically ill pediatric patients across hospitals with various levels of pediatric care
    (Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.), 2015-11-19) Benneyworth, Brian D.; Bennett, William E.; Carroll, Aaron E.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Inpatient administrative data sources describe the care provided to hospitalized children. The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) provides nationally representative estimates, while the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS, a consortium of pediatric facilities) derives more detailed information from revenue codes. The objective was to contextualize a diagnosis and procedure-based definition of critical illness to a revenue-based definition; then compare it across hospitals with different levels of pediatric care. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study utilized the 2009 KID, and 2009 inpatient discharges from the PHIS database. Patients <21 years of age (excluding neonates) were included to focus on pediatric critical illness. Critical illness was defined as: (1) critical care services (CC services) using diagnosis and procedures codes and (2) intensive care unit (ICU) care using revenue codes. Demographics, invasive procedures, and categories of critical illness were compared using Chi square and survey-weighted methods. The definitions of critical illness were compared in PHIS hospitals. CC services populations identified in General Hospitals, Pediatric Facilities, and Freestanding Children's hospitals (from KID) were compared to those in PHIS hospitals. RESULTS: Among PHIS hospitals, critically ill discharges identified by CC services accounted for 37.7% of ICU care. CC services discharges were younger and had greater proportion of respiratory illness and invasive procedure use. Critically ill patients identified by CC services in PHIS hospitals were statistically similar to those in Freestanding Children's hospitals. Pediatric Facilities and General Hospitals had more adolescents with more traumas. CC services patients in general hospitals had lower use of invasive procedures and predominance of trauma, respiratory illness, mental health issues, and general infections. Freestanding children's hospitals discharged 22% of the estimated 96,700 CC services cases. Similar proportions of critically ill patients were seen in Pediatric Facilities (31%) and General Hospitals (33%). CONCLUSION: The CC services definition captured a more severely ill fraction of critically ill children. Critically ill discharges from PHIS hospitals can likely be extrapolated to Freestanding Children's hospitals and Pediatric Facilities. General Hospitals, which provide a significant amount of pediatric critical care, are different. Studies utilizing administrative data can benefit from multiple data sources, which balance the individual strengths and weaknesses.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    In vitro comparison of gastric aspirate methods and feeding tube properties on the quantity and reliability of obtained aspirate volume
    (2013-11-20) Bartlett Ellis, Rebecca J.; Ellett, Marsha; Bakas, Tamilyn; Beckstrand, Janis; Fuehne, Joseph; Lu, Yvonne
    Gastric residual volume (GRV) is a clinical assessment to evaluate gastric emptying and enteral feeding tolerance. Factors such as the tube size, tube material, tube port configuration, placement of the tube in the gastric fluid, the amount of fluid and person completing the assessment may influence the accuracy of residual volume assessment. Little attention has been paid to assessing the accuracy of GRV measurement when the actual volume being aspirated is known, and no studies have compared the accuracy in obtaining RV using the three different techniques reported in the literature that are used to obtain aspirate in practice (syringe, suction, and gravity drainage). This in vitro study evaluated three different methods for aspirating feeding formula through two different tube sizes (10 Fr [small] and 18 Fr [large]), tube materials (polyvinyl chloride and polyurethane), using four levels of nursing experience (student, novice, experienced and expert) blinded to the five fixed fluid volumes of feeding formula in a simulated stomach, to determine if the RV can be accurately obtained. The study design consisted of a 3x2x2x4x5 completely randomized factorial ANOVA (with a total of 240 cells) and 479 RV assessments were made by the four nurse participants. All three methods (syringe, suction and gravity) used to aspirate RV did not perform substantially well in aspirating fluid, and on average, the methods were able to aspirate about 50% of the volume available. The syringe and suction techniques were comparable and produced higher proportions of RVs, although the interrater reliability of RV assessment was better with the syringe method. The gravity technique generally performed poorly. Overall, the polyvinyl chloride material and smaller tubes were associated with higher RV assessments. RV assessment is a variable assessment and the three methods did not perform well in this in vitro study. These findings should be further explored and confirmed using larger samples. This knowledge will be important in establishing the best technique for assessing RV to maximize EN delivery in practice and will contribute to future research to test strategies to optimize EN intake in critically ill patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intraoperative Sepsis: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents
    (AAMC, 2020-03-13) Webb, Timothy T.; Boyer, Tanna J.; Mitchell, Sally A.; Eddy, Christopher; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in medicine and is managed in ICUs daily. Critical care training is a vital part of anesthesiology residency, and understanding the presentation, management, and treatment of septic shock is fundamental to intraoperative patient care. Methods: This simulation involved a 58-year-old man undergoing surgical debridement of a peripancreatic cyst with hemodynamic instability and septic shock. We conducted the simulation yearly for clinical anesthesia year 2 residents (n = 26) in 1-hour sessions with three to five learners at a time. The simulation covered the six Anesthesiology Milestones related to sepsis and septic shock as outlined in the Anesthesiology Milestones Project. Results: To date, 155 anesthesiology residents have completed the simulation. Commonly missed critical actions included failure to recognize the need for invasive lines, provide appropriate volumes of fluid resuscitation, inquire about blood cultures and antibiotics, and recognize the need for the patient to remain intubated. Most participants could appropriately diagnose and treat intraoperative septic shock, but all had moments of action or inaction to discuss and improve upon, and all learned from this scenario. Discussion: Simulation is an optimal way to practice the more rare and life-threatening clinical events in medicine. Even though septic shock is commonly managed in the ICU, it is relatively uncommon for it to develop acutely in the OR. This simulation is an effective and educational way to discuss the most recent sepsis/septic shock definition and review evidence-based guidelines for treatment.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Renal and Bleeding Complications in Critically Ill Covid-19 Patient-A Case Report
    (Bangladesh Journals Online (BanglaJOL), 2020-06-03) Pia, Masuma Islam; Islam, Tasbirul; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The ongoing outbreak of Covid-19 presented with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Apart from the common respiratory complications, acute renal impairment and bleeding complications on full anticoagulation has been also observed in some patients. Here we report a 67 year old male with COPD and CKD presented with symptoms of covid-19 and found ground glass opacity on CT scan and bibasilar opacity on chest X-ray, admitted to the hospital and he was initially stable after supportive management, discharged home on antibiotics but readmitted after 4 days with worsening shortness of breath, hypoxia, tachycardia (A-fib with Rapid Ventricular Response) and high ESR. He was started on High flow nasal cannula (HFNC), diltiazem, adenosine and antibiotics ultimately needed intubation. While he was on antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, DVT prophylaxis and statin he developed septic shock two days after intubation. Next day he had to receive Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT). He was placed on heparin infusion. With clinical improvement the patient was extubated to HFNC, but after one day of extubation he developed bradycardia, hypotension and gradually became unresponsive. He was given vasopressors and intubated again. CT scan showed retroperitoneal hematoma 10 x7 x 12 cm. His heparin was discontinued and was managed conservatively. With supportive treatment his clinical condition improved gradually and was extubated again. CRRT was switched from CVVH (Continuous Veno -Venous Hemofiltration) to HD and eventually he was discharged home. Clinicians should remain watchful at all stages of critical care management of COVID 19 because timely intervention and drug adjustment is lifesaving.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    What should I address at follow-up of patients who survive critical illness?
    (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 2018-07) Golovyan, Dmitriy M.; Khan, Sikandar H.; Wang, Sophia; Khan, Babar A.; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine