Browsing by Subject "Cortical excitability"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere
    (MDPI, 2024-07-12) Wilkins, Erik W.; Young, Richard J.; Houston, Daniel; Kawana, Eric; Lopez Mora, Edgar; Sunkara, Meghana S.; Riley, Zachary A.; Poston, Brach; Exercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improves motor performance when applied unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the influence of tDCS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been quantified. The purpose was to determine the influence of tDCS applied to the dominant M1 on the excitability of the contralateral non-dominant M1. This study employed a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subject crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults performed two experimental sessions (tDCS, SHAM) in counterbalanced order separated by a one-week washout. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to quantify the excitability of the contralateral M1 to which anodal tDCS was applied for 20 min with a current strength of 1 mA. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed in 5 TMS test blocks (Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were performed immediately before and after tDCS application, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tDCS were completed at the 5, 10, and 15 min stimulation timepoints. MEPs were analyzed with a 2 condition (tDCS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subject ANOVA. The main effect for condition (p = 0.213), the main effect for test (p = 0.502), and the condition × test interaction (p = 0.860) were all not statistically significant. These results indicate that tDCS does not modulate contralateral M1 excitability during or immediately after application, at least under the current set of common tDCS parameters of stimulation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Excitability of the Unstimulated Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex
    (MDPI, 2025-05-17) Wilkins, Erik W.; Young, Richard J.; Davidson, Ryder; Krider, Reese; Alhwayek, George; Park, Jonathan A.; Parikh, Armaan C.; Riley, Zachary A.; Poston, Brach; Exercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences
    Objectives: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can enhance primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improve motor skill when delivered unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the impact of tACS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of tACS delivered to the dominant left M1 on the excitability of the unstimulated contralateral non-dominant right M1. Methods: This study implemented a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects, crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults completed a tACS condition and a SHAM condition on two different days in counterbalanced order with a week washout period between days. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was utilized to assess excitability of the contralateral right M1 while tACS was delivered to the left M1. TMS was administered in five test blocks (termed Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post) relative to a 20 min application of tACS (70 Hz, 1 mA current strength). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were conducted before and immediately after tACS was applied to the left M1, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tACS were completed at time points starting at the 5, 10, and 15 min marks of the 20 min stimulation period. The primary dependent variable was the 1 mV motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. MEP data were analyzed with a 2 condition (tACS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subjects ANOVA. Results: The main effect for condition (p = 0.704) and condition × test interaction (p = 0.349) were both non-statistically significant. There was a significant main effect for test (p = 0.003); however, post hoc analysis indicated that none of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that tACS applied to the left M1 does not significantly modulate contralateral right M1 excitability during or immediately after stimulation, at least when utilizing the present tACS parameters.