Browsing by Subject "Continuous glucose monitor"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in Device Uptake and Glycemic Control Among Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes: Data From the T1D Exchange
    (Sage, 2021) Levy, Carol J.; Foster, Nicole C.; DuBose, Stephanie N.; Agarwal, Shivani; Lyons, Sarah K.; Peters, Anne L.; Uwaifo, Gabriel I.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Sherr, Jennifer L.; Polsky, Sarit; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objectives: To examine changes in device use and glycemic outcomes for pregnant women from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry between the years 2010-2013 and 2016-2018. Methods: Participant-reported device use and glycemic outcomes were compared for women aged 16-40 years who were pregnant at the time of survey completion, comparing 2010-2013 (cohort 1) and 2016-2018 (cohort 2). Hemoglobin A1c results within 30 days prior to survey completion were obtained from medical records. Results: There were 208 pregnant women out of 5,236 eligible participants completing the questionnaire in cohort 1 and 47 pregnant women out of 2,818 eligible participants completing the questionaire in cohort 2. Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use while pregnant trended upward among cohort 2 (70% vs 37%, P = .02), while reported continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) use while pregnant declined (76% vs 64%, P = .04). HbA1c levels trended downward (6.8% cohort 1 vs 6.5% cohort 2, P = .07). Conclusions: Self-reported CGM use while pregnant increased over the studied intervals whereas CSII use decreased. Additional evaluation of device use and the potential benefits for T1D pregnancies is needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring
    (Wiley, 2022) Tauschmann, Martin; Forlenza, Gregory; Hood, Korey; Cardona-Hernandez, Roque; Giani, Elisa; Hendrieckx, Christel; DeSalvo, Daniel J.; Laffel, Lori M.; Saboo, Banshi; Wheeler, Benjamin J.; Laptev, Dmitry N.; Yarhere, Iroro; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sources and Valence of Information Impacting Parents' Decisions to Use Diabetes Technologies in Young Children <8 Years Old with Type 1 Diabetes
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2020-09) Commissariat, Persis V.; Whitehouse, Amanda L.; Hilliard, Marisa E.; Miller, Kellee M.; Harrington, Kara R.; Levy, Wendy; DeSalvo, Daniel J.; Van Name, Michelle A.; Anderson, Barbara J.; Tamborlane, William V.; DiMeglio, Linda A.; Laffel, Lori M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    There are multiple information sources available to assist families in learning about rapidly advancing diabetes technologies as care options for their children. This study explored where and from whom families of young children with type 1 diabetes get information about diabetes technologies and the valence (positive vs. negative) of that information. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents (86% mothers) of 79 youth <8 years old with type 1 diabetes for ≥6 months, ([mean ± standard deviation] age 5.2 ± 1.5 years, diabetes duration 2.4 ± 1.3 years, 77% white, A1c 63 ± 10 mmol/mol [7.9 ± 0.9%], 66% pump-treated, 58% using continuous glucose monitors [CGMs]). Interviews were transcribed and underwent content analysis to derive central themes. Most parents reported learning about new technologies from three direct sources: diabetes care providers, people with diabetes, and caregivers of children with diabetes. Parents also cited three indirect sources of information: online forums, publications, and diabetes-specific conferences. Parents reported hearing primarily positive things about technologies. Families not using pump and/or CGM noted reluctance to use technology due to family-specific concerns (e.g., cost, child's unwillingness to wear device) rather than information from outside sources. In this subset of parents, many still expressed willingness to initiate use once family-specific concerns were resolved. Parents of young children received largely positive information about diabetes technologies, primarily from health care providers and others familiar with using devices personally or for their children. To maximize diabetes technology use in young children, it is incumbent upon providers to ensure families receive balanced realistic information about benefits and barriers.