Browsing by Subject "Contact angle"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of contact angle between root canal sealers and dentin treated with calcium hydroxide and irrigation solutions
    (2018) Nakaparksin, Pranai; Platt, Jeffrey; Levon
, John A.; Bringas, Josef S.; Brown, David T.
    Background: Numerous studies have reported the effect of long-term use of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 to dentin. Nevertheless, there is little information available about the effect of Ca(OH)2 on wettability to the dentin. Objective: To investigate the effect of Ca(OH)2 application on dentin for two and four weeks on the wettability of two root canal sealers. Methods: Polished caries-free human dentin discs (n = 156) were allocated into 12 groups; G1 and G3 had two weeks’ treatment, G4 and G6, four weeks treatment. G1 and 101 G4 were treated with sterile water. G2, G3, G5 and G6 were treated with Ca(OH)2. G1, G3, G4, and G6 were irrigated with 6.0-percent NaOCl and 17-percent EDTA while G2, and G5 were irrigated with sterile water. Then, contact angles between Tubli-Seal and the treated dentin surfaces were measured. G7 and G12 were treated in the same fashion but were treated with BC sealer. Surface morphology evaluation of G1 and G6 was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Statistics were performed using three-way ANOVA and pair-wise comparisons between groups (α = 0.05). Results: Tubli-Seal (G1 through G6) had significantly smaller values for contact angles than BC sealer (G7 through G12) (p < 0.05). For the Tubli-Seal groups (G1 through G6), G4 had the highest mean of contact angles at 104.9 ± 1.9°, whereas G5 presented the lowest mean of contact angles at 85.4 ± 15.1. For the BC sealer groups (G7 through G12), G10 had the highest mean of contact angles at 145.4 ± 1.3°, while G11 demonstrated the lowest mean of contact angles at 130.2 ± 2.6°. Groups with Ca(OH)2 treatment with water irrigation (G2, 5, 11) had significantly lower contact angle than groups with Ca(OH)2 with chemical irrigation (G3, 6, 12) (p < 0.05), except G8, 9. According to SEM and EDX, water irrigation solution showed higher remaining Ca(OH)2 than irrigation with the chemical solution while Ca(OH)2 with chemical irrigation 102 demonstrated no Ca(OH)2 remaining after irrigation, similar to the surface of the control group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Tubli-seal has better wettability on dentin than BC sealer. Remaining calcium hydroxide demonstrated a trend toward decreased contact angle between dentin and root canal sealers. Moreover, two-minute irrigation with 6-percent NaOCl and 17-percent EDTA can remove calcium hydroxide from polished dentin surfaces.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A laboratory evaluation of detail reproduction, contact angle, and tear strength of three elastomeric impression materials
    (2011) Sun, Ming; Platt, Jeffrey A., 1958-; Levon, John A.; Cho, Sopanis D.; Paez de Mendoza, Carmen Y.; Brown, David T.
    Fabrications of desirable fixed or removable dental prostheses depend upon accurate casts or dies. Recently, the most frequently used impression materials have been polyether (PE) and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS). However, both have their limitations: PVS is inherently hydrophobic, and PE is rigid. In order to take advantage of the desirable qualities of both PVS and PE impression materials, a new generation of impression material is being developed called vinyl polyether silicone (VPES, GC). The purpose of the present study was to compare the properties of hydrophilic PVS, PE, and VPES in regard to surface detail reproduction, contact angle, and tear strength. The hypotheses to be tested were: 1) VPES will show a significant superiority insurface detail reproduction compared with PVS and PE impression materials; 2) VPES will show a significant superiority in wettability compared with PVS and PE impression materials; 3) VPES will show a significant superiority in tear strength compared with PVS and PE impression materials. In order to test the surface detail reproduction, impressions were made of stainless steel dies with a parallel series of 15 different width lines on the surface and tested under dry and moist conditions. The wettability was assessed by contact angles of saturated CaSO4 aqueous solution drops on flat impression surfaces. A trouser tear test was employed to test the tear strength. The trouser-shaped specimens were prepared and tested in the Instron Universal Testing Machine. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Pearson‘s Chi square, (p < 0.05). All the materials showed better detail reproduction under the dry conditions than the moist conditions. There were no differences between the three materials in detail reproduction when impressing under either moist conditions or dry conditions. All the materials showed good wettability in the contact angle test. PVS rendered a contact angle as low as 34.19º. The contact angle of VPES was 44.84º, which was lower than 54.76º for PE. In the tear strength test, PE showed nearly two time higher tear strength than the other two impression materials. VPES showed slightly lower tear strength than PVS. The tear strength of the three materials tested in increasing order was VPES, PVS, PE. VPES showed comparable detail reproduction to PVS and PE and better wettability than PE, but showed the lowest tear strength compared with PE and PVS.