Browsing by Subject "Cholecystectomy"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cholecystectomy, gallstones, tonsillectomy, and pancreatic cancer risk: a population-based case-control study in minnesota
    (Nature Publishing Group, 2014-04-29) Zhang, J; Prizment, A E; Dhakal, I B; Anderson, K E; Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Background: Associations between medical conditions and pancreatic cancer risk are controversial and are thus evaluated in a study conducted during 1994–1998 in Minnesota. Methods: Cases (n=215) were ascertained from hospitals in the metropolitan area of the Twin Cities and the Mayo Clinic. Controls (n=676) were randomly selected from the general population and frequency matched to cases by age and sex. The history of medical conditions was gathered with a questionnaire during in-person interviews. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Results: After adjustment for confounders, subjects who had cholecystectomy or gallstones experienced a significantly higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who did not (OR (95% CI): 2.11 (1.32–3.35) for cholecystectomy and 1.97 (1.23–3.12) for gallstones), whereas opposite results were observed for tonsillectomy (0.67 (0.48–0.94)). Increased risk associated with cholecystectomy was the greatest when it occurred ⩽2 years before the cancer diagnosis (5.93 (2.36–15.7)) but remained statistically significant when that interval was ⩾20 years (2.27 (1.16–4.32)). Conclusions: Cholecystectomy, gallstones, and tonsillectomy were associated with an altered risk of pancreatic cancer. Our study suggests that cholecystectomy increased risk but reverse causality may partially account for high risk associated with recent cholecystectomy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Endoscopic retrieval of a proximally migrated biliary stent: digital cholangioscope to the rescue
    (Elsevier, 2017-09-28) El Hajj, Ihab I.; Lehman, Glen A.; Fogel, Evan L.; Easler, Jeffrey J.; Watkins, James L.; Sherman, Stuart; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Endoscopic techniques for the retrieval of proximally migrated biliary stents include the following: fluoroscopy-guided grasping of the stent with a rat-tooth forceps, balloon placement parallel to the stent with traction retrieval, cannulation of the stent lumen with a wire (standard technique, or use of the curved plastic tip of a modified Soehendra stent retriever [Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind]) followed by use of standard or modified Soehendra stent retriever, wire-guided retrieval basket, and snare. The technique used depends on the extent of proximal stent migration, the presence of ductal dilatation or biliary stricture, and the endoscopist’s experience. This report describes the retrieval of a proximally migrated biliary stent within an aberrant right hepatic duct (RHD) using a digital cholangioscope (SpyGlass DS system; Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gallstone pancreatitis: general clinical approach and the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    (Korean Association of Internal Medicine, 2021-01) Kundumadam, Shanker; Fogel, Evan L.; Gromski, Mark Andrew; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Gallstones account for majority of acute pancreatitis in the Western world. Increase in number and smaller size of the stones increases the risk for biliary pancreatitis. In addition to features of acute pancreatitis, these patients also have cholestatic clinical picture. Fluid therapy and enteral nutrition are vital components in management of any case of acute pancreatitis. During initial evaluation, a right upper quadrant ultrasonogram is particularly important. On a case-bycase basis, further advanced imaging studies such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound may be warranted. Acute management also involves monitoring for local and systemic complications. Patients are triaged based on predictors of ongoing biliary obstruction in order to identify who would need endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Index cholecystectomy is safe and recommended, with exception of cases with significant local and systemic complications where delayed cholecystectomy may be safer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumour arising in the extrahepatic bile ducts; a rare neoplasm in an unusual anatomic location
    (BMJ, 2022-07-20) Miller, C. Quinn; Al-Hader, Ahmad; Vance, Gail H.; Zhang, Chen; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumour (GNET) is a rare, aggressive neoplasm with fewer than 100 cases reported in the literature. Most cases arise in the tubular gastrointestinal tract. We reported a unique case of GNET arising in the extrahepatic bile ducts and reviewed the literature of GNETs. The patient is a female in her mid-30s who presented with painless jaundice and diarrhoea several months after cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia. Workup revealed a tumour arising from the peripheral 4B bile ducts involving the left hepatic duct and bifurcation. Histologic examination of the lesion showed a malignant spindled and epithelioid neoplasm which strongly expressed S100 and SOX-10. Neoplastic cells were negative for various cytokeratins and melanoma markers. FISH testing using EWSR1 break-apart probes showed rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene region. The immunohistochemical and molecular findings are consistent with a diagnosis of GNET arising in the extrahepatic bile ducts.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Outcomes of Concurrent Ventral Hernia Repair and Cholecystectomy Compared to Ventral Hernia Repair Alone
    (Springer Nature, 2023-09-21) Becker, Timothy P.; Duggan, Ben; Rao, Varun; Deleon, Genaro; Pei, Kevin; Surgery, School of Medicine
    It has been suggested that hernia repair with concomitant cholecystectomy increases the risk of postoperative complications due to potential mesh contamination. This study compares postoperative outcomes and complications between patients who underwent ventral hernia repair (VHR) with and without concomitant cholecystectomy (CCY). Methods Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database, from 2005 to 2019, we queried patients who underwent ventral hernia repairs using the current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 49652-49657 (laparoscopic) and 49560-49566 (open), with or without cholecystectomy. The ACS NSQIP is a prospective, systematic study of patients who underwent major general surgical procedures aggregating data from over 200 hospitals. Cases involving additional concomitant procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes of interest were 30-day mortality, length of stay, readmission, return to operating room (OR), and postoperative complications. The odds ratio for primary outcomes was calculated using multivariable binomial logistic regression to control for patient risk factors. Results In total, 167586 cases were identified, 165,758 ventral hernia repairs alone, and 1,828 ventral hernia repairs with concomitant cholecystectomy. There was no difference in 30-day mortality, length of stay, readmission, return to the operating room, or postoperative complications between groups. Patients who underwent simultaneous VHR/CCY when compared to those who had VHR alone, had no differences in the rate of surgical site infections (1.86% vs. 1.97%, P = 0.57) or sepsis (0.82% vs. 0.41%, P = 0.10). Conclusion In a large national sample, there is no significant difference in postoperative outcomes, specifically infection-related complications, when comparing VHR along with concurrent VHR/CCY. Our findings suggest no increased risks for patients undergoing concurrent ventral hernia repair and cholecystectomy. Hence, surgeons might consider this combined approach to offer the best value-based care, especially when it could eliminate the need for a second operation and the risk of infection is low. Prospective studies with more procedural-specific information for hernia repairs and indications for cholecystectomy are needed however it is likely safe to perform both procedures during the same setting in cholecystectomy cases lacking signs of acute infection.