Browsing by Subject "Chemoprophylaxis"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Chemoprophylaxis under sporozoites-lumefantrine (CPS-LMF) immunization induce protective immune responses against Plasmodium yoelii sporozoites infection in mice
    (Springer, 2021) Siddiqui, Arif Jamal; Bhardwaj, Jyoti; Hamadou, Walid Sabri; Goyal, Manish; Ashraf, Syed Amir; Jahan, Sadaf; Jamal, Arshad; Sharma, Pankaj; Sachidanandan, Manojkumar; Badraoui, Riadh; Adnan, Mohd; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Malaria represents one of the major life-threatening diseases that poses a huge socio-economic impact, worldwide. Chemoprophylaxis vaccination using a relatively low number of wild-type infectious sporozoites represents an attractive and effective vaccine strategy against malaria. However, the role of immune responses to pre-erythrocytic versus blood-stage parasites in protection against different antimalarial drugs remains unclear. Here, in the present study, we explored the immune responses against the repetitive inoculation of live Plasmodium yoelii (P. yoelii) sporozoites in an experimental Swiss mouse model under antimalarial drug lumefantrine chemoprophylaxis (CPS-LMF). We monitored the liver stage parasitic load, pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines expression, and erythrocytic stage patency, following repetitive cycles of sporozoites inoculations. It was found that repetitive sporozoites inoculation under CPS-LMF results in delayed blood-stage infection during the fourth sporozoites challenge, while sterile protection was produced in mice following the fifth cycle of sporozoites challenge. Intriguingly, we observed a significant up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-12) and iNOS response and down-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10 and TGF-β) in the liver HMNC (hepatic mononuclear cells) and spleen cells after 4th and 5th cycle of sporozoites challenge in the CPS-LMF mice. Meanwhile, we also noticed that the liver stage parasites load under CPS-LMF immunization has gradually reduced after 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th sporozoites challenge. Overall, our study suggests that chemoprophylaxis vaccination under LMF drug cover develops strong immune responses and confer superior long-lasting protection against P. yoelii sporozoites. Furthermore, this vaccination strategy can be used to study the protective and stage-specific immunity against new protective antigens.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of pain after prophylactic anticoagulant injections to prevent venous thromboembolism
    (Elsevier, 2024-06-18) Shyu, Margaret; Robinson, Tyler P.; Morgan, Allison M.; Johnson, Julie K.; Shan, Ying; Bilimoria, Karl Y.; Yang, Anthony D.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Subcutaneous injection of unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently utilized for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis. We previously discovered that nurses believe patients experience more pain with UH compared to the LMWH enoxaparin; however, no published studies that are appropriately powered exist comparing pain associated with subcutaneous chemoprophylaxis. Our objective was to assess if differences exist in pain associated with subcutaneous administration of UH and enoxaparin. We conducted an observational study of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between 11/2017–4/2019. All patients received one of three prophylactic regimens: (1) UH only, (2) Initial dose of UH followed by enoxaparin, or (3) enoxaparin only. Of the 74 patients observed, 40 patients received UH followed by enoxaparin, 17 received UH only, and 17 received enoxaparin only. There was a significant difference in patients' mean perceived pain between subcutaneous UH and enoxaparin injections (mean post-injection pain after UH 3.3 vs. enoxaparin 1.5; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perceived pain for patients who received consecutive UH or enoxaparin injections. Differences in pain associated with different chemoprophylaxis agents may be an unrecognized driver of patient refusals of VTE chemoprophylaxis and may lead to worse VTE outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review
    (MDPI, 2024-05-08) Jiang, Rina; Fritz, Mike; Que, Syril Keena T.; Dermatology, School of Medicine
    Representing the second most common skin cancer, the incidence and disease burden of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) continues to increase. Surgical excision of the primary site effectively cures the majority of cSCC cases. However, an aggressive subset of cSCC persists with clinicopathological features that are indicative of higher recurrence, metastasis, and mortality risks. Acceleration of these features is driven by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The past several years have seen remarkable progress in shaping the treatment landscape for advanced cSCC. Risk stratification and clinical management is a top priority. This review provides an overview of the current perspectives on cSCC with a focus on staging, treatment, and maintenance strategies, along with future research directions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of an Extended-duration Chemoprophylaxis Regimen for Venous Thromboembolism after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2021-08) Pittelkow, Eric M.; DeBrock, Will C.; Mailey, Brian; Ballinger, Tarah J.; Socas, Juan; Lester, Mary E.; Hassanein, Aladdin H.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction are at a high risk for venous thromboembolism based upon Caprini scores. Guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis recommend high-risk groups receive extended chemoprophylaxis for several weeks after gynecological, orthopedic, and surgical oncology cases. Extended prophylaxis has not been studied in free flap breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of free flap breast reconstruction patients who received extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with those who received standard inpatient-only prophylaxis. Methods: Patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into two groups: standard VTE prophylaxis (Group I) and extended prophylaxis (Group II). Both groups received prophylactic subcutaneous heparin or enoxaparin preoperatively and enoxaparin 40 mg daily postoperatively while inpatient. Group II was discharged with a home regimen of enoxaparin 40 mg daily for an additional 14 days. Results: In total, 103 patients met inclusion criteria (36 patients in Group I, 67 patients in Group II). The incidence of VTE was 1.5% in Group II compared with 2.8% in Group I (P = 0.6). There was no difference in reoperative hematoma between Group I (n = 0) and Group II (n = 1) (P = 0.7). Total flap loss was 2.2%. Conclusions: Although this retrospective pilot study did not show statistical significance in VTE between those receiving extended home chemoprophylaxis (1.5% incidence) compared with inpatient-only chemoprophylaxis (2.8%), the risk of bleeding complications was similar. These results indicate that a larger, higher powered study is justified to assess if an extended home chemoprophylaxis protocol should be standard of care post free flap breast reconstruction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after bariatric surgery: a national survey of MBSAQIP director practices
    (Elsevier, 2023) Giannopoulos, Spyridon; Kalantar Motamedi, Seyed Mohammad; Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.; Clapp, Benjamin; Lyo, Victoria; Ghanem, Omar; Edwards, Michael; Puzziferri, Nancy; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; ASMBS Research Committee; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of death following metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS), with most events occurring after discharge. The available evidence on ideal prophylaxis type, dosage, and duration after discharge is limited. Objectives: Assess metabolic/bariatric surgeon VTE prophylaxis practices and define existing variability. Setting: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited centers. Methods: The members of the ASMBS Research Committee developed and administered a web-based survey to MBSAQIP medical directors and ASMBS members to examine the differences in clinical practice regarding the administration of VTE prophylaxis after MBS. Results: Overall, 264 metabolic/bariatric surgeons (136 medical directors and 128 ASMBS members) participated in the survey. Both mechanical and chemical VTE prophylaxis was used by 97.1% of the participants, knee-high compression devices by 84.7%, enoxaparin (32.4% 40 mg every 24 hours, 22.7% 40 mg every 12 hours, 24.4% adjusted the dose based on body mass index) by 56.5%, and heparin (46.1% 5000 units every 8 hours, 22.6% 5000 units every 12 hours, 20.9% 5000 units once preoperatively) by 38.1%. Most surgeons (81.6%) administered the first dose preoperatively, while the first postoperative dose was given on the evening of surgery by 44% or the next morning by 42.2%. Extended VTE prophylaxis was prescribed for 2 weeks by 38.7% and 4 weeks by 28.9%. Conclusions: VTE prophylaxis practices vary widely among metabolic/bariatric surgeons. Variability may be related to limited available comparative evidence. Large prospective clinical trials are needed to define optimal practices for VTE risk stratification and prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients.