Browsing by Subject "Cetuximab"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cetuximab for Immunotherapy-Refractory/Ineligible Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    (MDPI, 2023-06-14) Marin-Acevedo, Julian A.; Withycombe, Bethany M.; Kim, Youngchul; Brohl, Andrew S.; Eroglu, Zeynep; Markowitz, Joseph; Tarhini, Ahmad A.; Tsai, Kenneth Y.; Khushalani, Nikhil I.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Anti-PD1 therapy demonstrated impressive, prolonged responses in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Therapy for ICI-refractory/ineligible disease remains unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis in locally-advanced/metastatic CSCC using cetuximab across three cohorts: immediately after ICI failure (A), not immediately following ICI failure (B), or without prior ICI (C). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease-control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time-to-response (TTR) and toxicity. Twenty-three patients were included. In cohort A (n = 11), the ORR was 64% and DCR was 91%, with six ongoing responses at data cutoff. In cohort B (n = 2), all patients had progression as the best response. At a median follow-up of 21 months for A and B, TTR and PFS were 2.0 and 17.3 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached. In cohort C (n = 10), the ORR and DCR were 80%, including five ongoing responses at the data cutoff. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the TTR, PFS and OS were 2.5, 7.3 and 23.1 months, respectively. Cetuximab was well tolerated in all cohorts. In summary, cetuximab is effective in patients with failure/contraindications to ICI. Cetuximab immediately after ICI failure yielded particularly fast, durable responses. If confirmed, this could be the preferred therapy following ICI failure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    LSD1 inhibition attenuates targeted therapy-induced lineage plasticity in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
    (Springer Nature, 2025-04-23) Ladaika, Christopher A.; Chakraborty, Averi; Masood, Ashiq; Hostetter, Galen; Yi, Joo Mi; O’Hagan, Heather M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: BRAF activating mutations occur in approximately 10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRCs) and are associated with worse prognosis in part due to an inferior response to standard chemotherapy. Standard of care for patients with refractory metastatic BRAFV600E CRC is treatment with BRAF and EGFR inhibitors and recent FDA approval was given to use these inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for patients with treatment naïve metastatic BRAFV600E CRC. Lineage plasticity to neuroendocrine cancer is an emerging mechanism of targeted therapy resistance in several cancer types. Enteroendocrine cells (EECs), the neuroendocrine cell of the intestine, are uniquely present in BRAF mutant CRC as compared to BRAF wildtype CRC. Methods: BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor treatment induced changes in cell composition were determined by gene expression, imaging and single cell approaches in multiple models of BRAF mutant CRC. Furthermore, multiple clinically relevant inhibitors of the lysine demethylase LSD1 were tested to determine which inhibitor blocked the changes in cell composition. Results: Combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition enriched for EECs in all BRAF mutant CRC models tested. Additionally, EECs and other secretory cell types were enriched in a subset of BRAFV600E CRC patient samples following targeted therapy. Importantly, inhibition of LSD1 with a clinically relevant inhibitor attenuated targeted therapy-induced EEC enrichment through blocking the interaction of LSD1, CoREST2 and STAT3. Conclusions: Our findings that BRAF plus EGFR inhibition induces lineage plasticity in BRAFV600E CRC represents a new paradigm for how resistance to BRAF plus EGFR inhibition occurs. Additionally, our finding that LSD1 inhibition blocks lineage plasticity has the potential to improve responses to BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor therapy in patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Plasma Protein Biomarkers in Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab or Cetuximab: Results from CALGB 80405 (Alliance)
    (American Association for Cancer Research, 2022) Nixon, Andrew B.; Sibley, Alexander B.; Liu, Yingmiao; Hatch, Ace J.; Jiang, Chen; Mulkey, Flora; Starr, Mark D.; Brady, John C.; Niedzwiecki, Donna; Venook, Alan P.; Baez-Diaz, Luis; Lenz, Heinz-Josef; O’Neil, Bert H.; Innocenti, Federico; Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.; O’Reilly, Eileen M.; Owzar, Kouros; Hurwitz, Herbert I.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: CALGB 80405 compared the combination of first-line chemotherapy with cetuximab or bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although similar clinical outcomes were observed in the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group, biomarkers could identify patients deriving more benefit from either biologic agent. Patients and methods: In this exploratory analysis, the Angiome, a panel of 24 soluble protein biomarkers were measured in baseline plasma samples in CALGB 80405. Prognostic biomarkers were determined using univariate Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive biomarkers were identified using multivariable Cox regression models including interaction between biomarker level and treatment. Results: In the total population, high plasma levels of Ang-2, CD73, HGF, ICAM-1, IL6, OPN, TIMP-1, TSP-2, VCAM-1, and VEGF-R3 were identified as prognostic of worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PlGF was identified as predictive of lack of PFS benefit from bevacizumab [bevacizumab HR, 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-2.06; cetuximab HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.25; Pinteraction = 0.0298] in the combined FOLFIRI/FOLFOX regimens. High levels of VEGF-D were predictive of lack of PFS benefit from bevacizumab in patients receiving FOLFOX regimen only (FOLFOX/bevacizumab HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.19-2.42; FOLFOX/cetuximab HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.68-1.24; Pinteraction = 0.0097). Conclusions: In this exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis, the Angiome identified multiple prognostic biomarkers and two potential predictive biomarkers for patients with mCRC enrolled in CALGB 80405. PlGF and VEGF-D predicted lack of benefit from bevacizumab in a chemo-dependent manner.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A study-level meta-analysis of efficacy data from head-to-head first-line trials of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors versus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    (Elsevier, 2016-11) Heinemann, Volker; Rivera, Fernando; O'Neil, Bert H.; Stintzing, Sebastian; Koukakis, Reija; Terwey, Jan-Henrik; Douillard, Jean-Yves; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Background Head-to-head trials comparing first-line epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI) versus vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (bevacizumab) therapy yielded differing results, and debate remains over optimal first-line therapy for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods A PubMed search identified first-line mCRC trials comparing EGFRI plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy; data were subsequently updated using recent congress presentations. This study-level meta-analysis estimated the overall survival (OS) treatment effect of first-line chemotherapy plus EGFRIs or bevacizumab in patients with RAS WT mCRC. Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), resection rate and safety. Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) of ≥20% at week 8 was an exploratory end-point. Results Three trials comprising data from 1096 patients with RAS WT mCRC were included. OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80 [95% confidence interval: 0.68–0.93]), ORR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.57) and ETS (OR: 0.48) favoured EGFRIs plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. PFS (HR: 0.98) and resections (OR: 0.93) were similar between treatments. For patients with KRAS exon 2 WT/‘other’ RAS mutant mCRC the OS HR was 0.70. A safety meta-analysis was not possible due to a lack of data; in the individual studies, skin toxicities and hypomagnesaemia were more common with EGFRIs, nausea and hypertension were more common with bevacizumab. Conclusions This meta-analysis supports a potential benefit for first-line EGFRI plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy with respect to OS, ORR and ETS in patients with RAS WT mCRC. A patient-level meta-analysis is awaited.