Browsing by Subject "Central precocious puberty"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Delayed and Precocious Puberty: Genetic Underpinnings and Treatments
    (Elsevier, 2020-12) Gohil, Anisha; Eugster, Erica A.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Delayed puberty may signify a common variation of normal development, or indicate the presence of a pathologic process. Constitutional delay of growth and puberty is a strongly familial type of developmental pattern and accounts for the vast majority of children who are "late bloomers." Individuals with sex chromosomal abnormalities frequently have hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. There are currently 4 known monogenic causes of central precocious puberty. The primary treatment goal in children with hypogonadism is to mimic normal pubertal progression, while the primary aims for the management of precocious puberty are preservation of height potential and prevention of further pubertal development.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Psychological assessment of mothers and their daughters at the time of diagnosis of precocious puberty
    (BioMed Central, 2015-03-16) Schoelwer, Melissa J.; Donahue, Kelly L.; Bryk, Kristina; Didrick, Paula; Berenbaum, Sheri A.; Eugster, Erica A.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Concerns about psychological distress are often used to justify treatment of girls with precocious puberty, but there is little evidence to support these concerns. The extent to which psychological problems are associated with central precocious puberty (CPP) compared with other forms of early puberty in girls has likewise not been established. METHODS: Girls presenting with untreated CPP, premature adrenarche (PA) or early normal puberty (ENP) were recruited from our pediatric endocrine clinic along with their mothers. Child psychological adjustment was assessed by child self-report and parent report. Parent self-reported personality, anxiety, and depression were also assessed. Differences between groups were explored using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's T3 test. RESULTS: Sixty-two subjects (aged 7.5 ± 1.4 years, range 4.8-10.5) were enrolled, of whom 19 had CPP, 22 had PA, and 21 had ENP. Girls with ENP were significantly older (8.9 ± .9 years) than girls with CPP (6.9 ± 1.1 years, p < .001) and PA (6.6 ± 1.0 years, p < .001). Girls with PA had significantly higher BMI z-scores (1.7 ± .8) than girls with CPP (1.1 ± .6, p = .01) and ENP (1.2 ± .6, p = .04). More girls with PA and ENP were from racial minorities (47% and 50% respectively) than girls with CPP (32%). No group differences were found for any child measure of psychological adjustment. However, mothers of girls with PA scored significantly higher than mothers of girls with ENP on one measure of depression (p = .04) and stress (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: While mothers of girls with PA report increased psychological distress on some measures, no differences in psychological adjustment were found at baseline amongst the girls themselves. Whether these results will change as puberty progresses in the PA and ENP groups or with treatment of CPP is unknown. Long-term prospective studies are needed in order to further investigate psychological correlates of early puberty in girls.