- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Bioprinting"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Advanced biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration(Wiley, 2022) Daghrery, Arwa; Bottino, Marco C.; Biomedical and Applied Sciences, School of DentistryThe periodontium is a suitable target for regenerative intervention, since it does not functionally restore itself after disease. Importantly, the limited regeneration capacity of the periodontium could be improved with the development of novel biomaterials and therapeutic strategies. Of note, the regenerative potential of the periodontium depends not only on its tissue‐specific architecture and function, but also on its ability to reconstruct distinct tissues and tissue interfaces, suggesting that the advancement of tissue engineering approaches can ultimately offer new perspectives to promote the organized reconstruction of soft and hard periodontal tissues. Here, we discuss material‐based, biologically active cues, and the application of innovative biofabrication technologies to regenerate the multiple tissues that comprise the periodontium.Item Effects of a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, AZD7762, on tumor suppression and bone remodeling(Spandidos Publications, 2018-09) Wang, Luqi; Wang, Yue; Chen, Andy; Jalali, Aydin; Liu, Shengzhi; Guo, Yunxia; Na, Sungsoo; Nakshatri, Harikrishna; Li, Bai-Yan; Yokota, Hiroki; Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and TechnologyChemotherapy for suppressing tumor growth and metastasis tends to induce various effects on other organs. Using AZD7762, an inhibitor of checkpoint kinase (Chk) 1 and 2, the present study examined its effect on mammary tumor cells in addition to bone cells (osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes), using monolayer cell cultures and three-dimensional (3D) cell spheroids. The results revealed that AZD7762 blocked the proliferation of 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells and suppressed the development of RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells by downregulating nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1. AZD7762 also promoted the mineralization of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells and 3D bio-printed bone constructs of MLO-A5 osteocyte spheroids. While a Chk1 inhibitor, PD407824, suppressed the proliferation of tumor cells and the differentiation of pre-osteoclasts, its effect on gene expression in osteoblasts was markedly different compared with AZD7762. Western blotting indicated that the stimulating effect of AZD7762 on osteoblast development was associated with the inhibition of Chk2 and the downregulation of cellular tumor antigen p53. The results of the present study indicated that in addition to acting as a tumor suppressor, AZD7762 may prevent bone loss by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and stimulating osteoblast mineralization.Item Norbornene-functionalized methylcellulose as a thermo- and photo-responsive bioink(IOP, 2021-09-21) Kim, Min Hee; Lin, Chien-Chi; Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology3D bioprinting has emerged as an important tool to fabricate scaffolds with complex structures for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. For extrusion-based 3D bioprinting, the success of printing complex structures relies largely on the properties of bioink. Methylcellulose (MC) has been exploited as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting due to its temperature-dependent rheological properties. However, MC is highly soluble and has low structural stability at room temperature, making it suboptimal for 3D bioprinting applications. In this study, we report a one-step synthesis protocol for modifying MC with norbornene (MCNB), which serves as a new bioink for 3D bioprinting. MCNB preserves the temperature-dependent reversible sol-gel transition and readily reacts with thiol-bearing linkers through light-mediated step-growth thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Furthermore, we rendered the otherwise inert MC network bioactive through facile conjugation of integrin-binding ligands (e.g., CRGDS) or via incorporating cell-adhesive and protease-sensitive gelatin-based macromer (e.g., GelNB). The adaptability of the new MCNB-based bioink offers an attractive option for diverse 3D bioprinting applications.Item Orthogonally crosslinked gelatin-norbornene hydrogels for biomedical applications(Wiley, 2024) Lin, Chien-Chi; Frahm, Ellen; Afolabi, Favor O.; Biomedical Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and TechnologyThe thiol-norbornene photo-click reaction has exceptionally fast crosslinking efficiency compared with chain-growth polymerization at equivalent macromer contents. The orthogonal reactivity between norbornene and thiol/tetrazine permits crosslinking of synthetic and naturally derived macromolecules with modularity, including poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-norbornene (PEGNB), gelatin-norbornene (GelNB), among others. For example, collagen-derived gelatin contains both cell adhesive motifs (e.g., Arg-Gly-Asp or RGD) and protease-labile sequences, making it an ideal macromer for forming cell-laden hydrogels. First reported in 2014, GelNB is increasingly used in orthogonal crosslinking of biomimetic matrices in various applications. GelNB can be crosslinked into hydrogels using multi-functional thiol linkers (e.g., dithiothreitol (DTT) or PEG-tetra-thiol (PEG4SH) via visible light or longwave ultraviolet (UV) light step-growth thiol-norbornene reaction or through an enzyme-mediated crosslinking (i.e., horseradish peroxidase, HRP). GelNB-based hydrogels can also be modularly crosslinked with tetrazine-bearing macromers via inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (iEDDA) click reaction. This review surveys the various methods for preparing GelNB macromers, the crosslinking mechanisms of GelNB-based hydrogels, and their applications in cell and tissue engineering, including crosslinking of dynamic matrices, disease modeling, and tissue regeneration, delivery of therapeutics, as well as bioprinting and biofabrication.Item Progress in scaffold-free bioprinting for cardiovascular medicine(Wiley, 2018-06) Moldovan, Nicanor I.; Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and TechnologyBiofabrication of tissue analogues is aspiring to become a disruptive technology capable to solve standing biomedical problems, from generation of improved tissue models for drug testing to alleviation of the shortage of organs for transplantation. Arguably, the most powerful tool of this revolution is bioprinting, understood as the assembling of cells with biomaterials in three-dimensional structures. It is less appreciated, however, that bioprinting is not a uniform methodology, but comprises a variety of approaches. These can be broadly classified in two categories, based on the use or not of supporting biomaterials (known as "scaffolds," usually printable hydrogels also called "bioinks"). Importantly, several limitations of scaffold-dependent bioprinting can be avoided by the "scaffold-free" methods. In this overview, we comparatively present these approaches and highlight the rapidly evolving scaffold-free bioprinting, as applied to cardiovascular tissue engineering.Item Scaffold-free bioprinting of mesenchymal stem cells with the regenova printer: Optimization of printing parameters(Elsevier, 2019-03-23) Aguilar, Izath Nizeet; Smith, Lester J.; Olivos, David J.; Chu, Tien-Min Gabriel; Kacena, Melissa A.; Wagner, Diane R.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineThe Kenzan bioprinting method provides a high-resolution biofabrication process by facilitating the fusion of submillimeter cell aggregates (spheroids) into larger tissue constructs on a needle array that is removed upon spheroid fusion. Although the method is relatively straightforward in principle, Kenzan method bioprinting relies on a complex 3D bioprinter (Regenova Bio 3D Printer, Cyfuse, K.K., Japan) implementing an advanced vision system to verify the microscopic spheroids’ geometry and high-precision mechatronics to aseptically manipulate the spheroids into position. Due to the complexity of the operation, the need for aseptic conditions, and the size of the spheroids, proficiency with the Regenova Bio 3D Printer and the Kenzan method requires development of best practices and troubleshooting techniques to ensure a robust print and minimize the use of resources. In addition, managing the construct post-bioprinting both in culture and for surgical implantation requires careful consideration and workflow design. Here, we describe methods for generating a competent tissue construct and optimizing the bioprinting process. Optimization resulted in a 4-fold reduction in print times, a 20-fold reduction in the use of bioprinting nozzles, and more robust constructs. The results and procedures described herein will have potential applications for tissue engineering, research, and clinical uses in the future.Item The 'bIUreactor': An Open-Source 3D Tissue Research Platform(Springer, 2024) Butch, Elizabeth; Prideaux, Matthew; Holland, Mark; Phan, Justin‑Thuy; Trent, Cole; Soon, Victor; Hutchins, Gary; Smith, Lester; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineWe developed the open-source bIUreactor research platform for studying 3D structured tissues. The versatile and modular platform allows a researcher to generate 3D tissues, culture them with oxygenated perfusion, and provide cyclic loading, all in their own lab (in laboratorium) for an all in cost of $8,000 including 3D printer, printing resin, and electronics. We achieved this by applying a design philosophy that leverages 3D printing, open-source software and hardware, and practical techniques to produce the following: 1. perfusible 3D tissues, 2. a bioreactor chamber for tissue culture, 3. a module for applying cyclic compression, 4. a peristaltic pump for providing oxygenated perfusion to 3D tissues, 5. motor control units, and 6. open-source code for running the control units. By making it widely available for researchers to investigate 3D tissue models and easy for them to use, we intend for the bIUreactor to democratize 3D tissue research, therefore increasing the pace and scale of biomedical research discoveries using 3D tissue models.Item The Long-Road to Develop Custom-Built Livers: Current Status of 3D Liver Bioprinting(Wolters Kluwer, 2024) Cross-Najafi, Arthur A.; Farag, Kristine; Chen, Angela M.; Smith, Lester J.; Zhang, Wenjun; Li, Ping; Ekser, Burcin; Surgery, School of MedicineAlthough liver transplantation is the gold-standard therapy for end-stage liver disease, the shortage of suitable organs results in only 25% of waitlisted patients undergoing transplants. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an emerging technology and a potential solution for personalized medicine applications. This review highlights existing 3D bioprinting technologies of liver tissues, current anatomical and physiological limitations to 3D bioprinting of a whole liver, and recent progress bringing this innovation closer to clinical use. We reviewed updated literature across multiple facets in 3D bioprinting, comparing laser, inkjet, and extrusion-based printing modalities, scaffolded versus scaffold-free systems, development of an oxygenated bioreactor, and challenges in establishing long-term viability of hepatic parenchyma and incorporating structurally and functionally robust vasculature and biliary systems. Advancements in liver organoid models have also increased their complexity and utility for liver disease modeling, pharmacologic testing, and regenerative medicine. Recent developments in 3D bioprinting techniques have improved the speed, anatomical, and physiological accuracy, and viability of 3D-bioprinted liver tissues. Optimization focusing on 3D bioprinting of the vascular system and bile duct has improved both the structural and functional accuracy of these models, which will be critical in the successful expansion of 3D-bioprinted liver tissues toward transplantable organs. With further dedicated research, patients with end-stage liver disease may soon be recipients of customized 3D-bioprinted livers, reducing or eliminating the need for immunosuppressive regimens.