Browsing by Subject "Biologics"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical Outcome Assessments in Pediatric Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Receiving Biologics: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    (Oxford University Press, 2022-03-18) Hunter, Theresa; Komocsar, Wendy J.; Liu, Chunyan; Colletti, Richard B.; Steiner, Steven J.; Dotson, Jennifer L.; Benkov, Keith; Zhang, Nanhua; Crandall, Wallace; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: To assess disease activity, steroid-free remission, and other clinical outcome assessments among pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) in the ImproveCareNow (ICN) registry. Methods: Patients aged 2-17 years diagnosed with UC or CD between June 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019 were enrolled if they initiated a biologic after enrollment in the ICN registry and completed at least 12 months follow-up after first maintenance dose. Baseline (at biologic initiation) demographics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI), partial Mayo score, and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) were assessed for UC; and the Short Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (sPCDAI) and PGA were assessed for CD at first maintenance dose, 1- and 3-year time points. Kappa coefficients were used to assess the level of agreement between the outcome measures. Results: A total of 1887 patients (UC = 350; CD = 1537) were included. Baseline demographics were similar across groups. For UC patients, mean PUCAI scores decreased and the proportion of patients in steroid-free remission, quiescent state based on PGA, and remission based on partial Mayo score increased from first maintenance dose to 1 and 3 years. For CD patients, mean sPCDAI score of CD patients decreased and the proportion of patients in steroid-free remission by sPCDAI and in quiescent state based on PGA increased from first maintenance dose to 1 and 3 years. Kappa coefficients showed only modest correlation between disease activity assessments. Conclusions: Disease activity scores improved over time, with more pediatric patients with UC and CD achieving steroid-free remission at 1 and 3 years after first biologic maintenance dose.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Vedolizumab to Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis
    (Elsevier, 2022) Lukin, Dana; Faleck, David; Xu, Ronghui; Zhang, Yiran; Weiss, Aaron; Aniwan, Satimai; Kadire, Siri; Tran, Gloria; Rahal, Mahmoud; Winters, Adam; Chablaney, Shreya; Koliani-Pace, Jenna L.; Meserve, Joseph; Campbell, James P.; Kochhar, Gursimran; Bohm, Matthew; Varma, Sashidhar; Fischer, Monika; Boland, Brigid; Singh, Siddharth; Hirten, Robert; Ungaro, Ryan; Lasch, Karen; Shmidt, Eugenia; Jairath, Vipul; Hudesman, David; Chang, Shannon; Swaminath, Arun; Shen, Bo; Kane, Sunanda; Loftus, Edward V., Jr.; Sands, Bruce E.; Colombel, Jean-Frederic; Siegel, Corey A.; Sandborn, William J.; Dulai, Parambir S.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background & aims: We aimed to compare safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist therapy in ulcerative colitis in routine practice. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study (May 2014 to December 2017) of ulcerative colitis patients treated with vedolizumab or TNF-antagonist therapy. Propensity score weighted comparisons for development of serious adverse events and achievement of clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and steroid-free deep remission. A priori determined subgroup comparisons in TNF-antagonist-naïve and -exposed patients, and for vedolizumab against infliximab and subcutaneous TNF-antagonists separately. Results: A total of 722 (454 vedolizumab, 268 TNF antagonist) patients were included. Vedolizumab-treated patients were more likely to achieve clinical remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.651; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229-2.217), steroid-free clinical remission (HR, 1.828; 95% CI, 1.135-2.944), and steroid-free deep remission (HR, 2.819; 95% CI, 1.496-5.310) than those treated with TNF antagonists. Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in TNF-antagonist-naïve and -exposed patients, and for vedolizumab vs infliximab and vs subcutaneous TNF-antagonist agents separately. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (HR, 0.899; 95% CI, 0.502-1.612) or serious infections (HR, 1.235; 95% CI, 0.608-2.511) between vedolizumab-treated and TNF-antagonist-treated patients. However, in TNF-antagonist-naïve patients, vedolizumab was less likely to be associated with serious adverse events than TNF antagonists (HR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.049-0.754). Conclusions: Treatment of ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab is associated with higher rates of remission than treatment with TNF-antagonist therapy in routine practice, and lower rates of serious adverse events in TNF-antagonist-naïve patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Treatment escalation patterns to start biologics in refractory moderate juvenile dermatomyositis among members of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance
    (BMC, 2023-01-06) Sherman, Matthew A.; Kim, Hanna; Banschbach, Katelyn; Brown, Amanda; Gewanter, Harry L.; Lang, Bianca; Perron, Megan; Byun Robinson, Angela; Spitznagle, Jacob; Stingl, Cory; Syverson, Grant; Tory, Heather O.; Spencer, Charles H.; Tarvin, Stacey E.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Despite new and better treatments for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), not all patients with moderate severity disease respond adequately to first-line therapy. Those with refractory disease remain at higher risk for disease and glucocorticoid-related complications. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become part of the arsenal of treatments for JDM. However, prospective comparative studies of commonly used biologics are lacking. Methods: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM biologics workgroup met in 2019 and produced a survey assessing current treatment escalation practices for JDM, including preferences regarding use of biologic treatments. The cases and questions were developed using a consensus framework, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. The survey was completed online in 2020 by CARRA members interested in JDM. Survey results were analyzed among all respondents and according to years of experience. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the distribution of responses to each survey question. Results: One hundred twenty-one CARRA members responded to the survey (denominators vary for each question). Of the respondents, 88% were pediatric rheumatologists, 85% practiced in the United States, and 43% had over 10 years of experience. For a patient with moderately severe JDM refractory to methotrexate, glucocorticoids, and IVIG, approximately 80% of respondents indicated that they would initiate a biologic after failing 1-2 non-biologic DMARDs. Trials of methotrexate and mycophenolate were considered necessary by 96% and 60% of respondents, respectively, before initiating a biologic. By weighed average, rituximab was the preferred biologic over abatacept, tocilizumab, and infliximab. Over 50% of respondents would start a biologic by 4 months from diagnosis for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. There were no notable differences in treatment practices between respondents by years of experience. Conclusion: Most respondents favored starting a biologic earlier in disease course after trialing up to two conventional DMARDs, specifically including methotrexate. There was a clear preference for rituximab. However, there remains a dearth of prospective data comparing biologics in refractory JDM. These findings underscore the need for biologic consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for refractory JDM, which will ultimately facilitate comparative effectiveness studies and inform treatment practices.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Will There Be a Role for a Short-Acting Biosimilar Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent in US Nephrology Practice?
    (Elsevier, 2019-07-11) Wish, Jay B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Patent protection for pharmaceuticals in the United States is very robust and perhaps there is no greater example than epoetin alfa. Since the approval of epoetin alfa by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1989, the developer, Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA), has successfully defended its patent against competing agents, such as epoetin beta (Chugai-Upjohn, Rosemont, IL), epoetin delta (Shire, Lexington, MA), and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (CERA; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The US patent on epoetin alfa expired in 2015, opening the way for competition by products other than Amgen’s own darbepoetin. The first non-Amgen erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to enter the US market was CERA, which had previously been approved by the FDA as a new drug under a biologic license application 351(a). Drugs approved through the 351(a) pathway must undergo expensive clinical testing, the cost of which is ultimately passed on to the consumer. ESAs are biologic drugs, defined by the FDA as “a virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin, blood, blood component or derivative, allergenic product, protein (except any chemically synthesized polypeptide), or analogous product . . . applicable to the prevention, treatment of cure of a disease or condition of human beings.”